MR of the knee: The significance of high signal in the meniscus that does not clearly extend to the surface

P. A. Kaplan, N. L. Nelson, Kevin Lloyd Garvin, D. E. Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

On MR images of the knee it is sometimes impossible to determine with confidence if a focus of high signal in the meniscus is confined to the substance of the meniscus or if it extends to involve the surface. This is a critical differentiation because the latter represents meniscal tears that can be found and treated at arthroscopy, whereas the former represents degeneration, tears, or perhaps normal variants that cannot be detected or treated arthroscopically. We make an equivocal diagnosis of a tear when it is difficult to decide if signal in a meniscus involves the meniscal surface. We studied MR scans of the knee in 142 consecutive patients for the presence of such equivocal tears. Their prevalence was 14% (20/142); 17 were in the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus and three were in the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. In 13 cases with arthroscopy/arthrotomy correlation, no tears were found. In one of the 20 patients in whom the meniscus was removed during arthroplasty, histologic examination of the meniscus showed separation of collagen bundles, which was caused by meniscal degeneration confined to the substance of the meniscus. These results suggest that a meniscal tear is unlikely when MR scans show a focus of high signal in a meniscus that does not unequivocally extend to involve the surface of the meniscus.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)333-336
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume156
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1991

Fingerprint

Knee
Tears
Tibial Meniscus
Arthroscopy
Horns
Meniscus
Arthroplasty
Collagen

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

MR of the knee : The significance of high signal in the meniscus that does not clearly extend to the surface. / Kaplan, P. A.; Nelson, N. L.; Garvin, Kevin Lloyd; Brown, D. E.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 156, No. 2, 01.01.1991, p. 333-336.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0179d98688b5418a8292400105c670dd,
title = "MR of the knee: The significance of high signal in the meniscus that does not clearly extend to the surface",
abstract = "On MR images of the knee it is sometimes impossible to determine with confidence if a focus of high signal in the meniscus is confined to the substance of the meniscus or if it extends to involve the surface. This is a critical differentiation because the latter represents meniscal tears that can be found and treated at arthroscopy, whereas the former represents degeneration, tears, or perhaps normal variants that cannot be detected or treated arthroscopically. We make an equivocal diagnosis of a tear when it is difficult to decide if signal in a meniscus involves the meniscal surface. We studied MR scans of the knee in 142 consecutive patients for the presence of such equivocal tears. Their prevalence was 14{\%} (20/142); 17 were in the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus and three were in the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. In 13 cases with arthroscopy/arthrotomy correlation, no tears were found. In one of the 20 patients in whom the meniscus was removed during arthroplasty, histologic examination of the meniscus showed separation of collagen bundles, which was caused by meniscal degeneration confined to the substance of the meniscus. These results suggest that a meniscal tear is unlikely when MR scans show a focus of high signal in a meniscus that does not unequivocally extend to involve the surface of the meniscus.",
author = "Kaplan, {P. A.} and Nelson, {N. L.} and Garvin, {Kevin Lloyd} and Brown, {D. E.}",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2214/ajr.156.2.1898808",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "156",
pages = "333--336",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MR of the knee

T2 - The significance of high signal in the meniscus that does not clearly extend to the surface

AU - Kaplan, P. A.

AU - Nelson, N. L.

AU - Garvin, Kevin Lloyd

AU - Brown, D. E.

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - On MR images of the knee it is sometimes impossible to determine with confidence if a focus of high signal in the meniscus is confined to the substance of the meniscus or if it extends to involve the surface. This is a critical differentiation because the latter represents meniscal tears that can be found and treated at arthroscopy, whereas the former represents degeneration, tears, or perhaps normal variants that cannot be detected or treated arthroscopically. We make an equivocal diagnosis of a tear when it is difficult to decide if signal in a meniscus involves the meniscal surface. We studied MR scans of the knee in 142 consecutive patients for the presence of such equivocal tears. Their prevalence was 14% (20/142); 17 were in the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus and three were in the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. In 13 cases with arthroscopy/arthrotomy correlation, no tears were found. In one of the 20 patients in whom the meniscus was removed during arthroplasty, histologic examination of the meniscus showed separation of collagen bundles, which was caused by meniscal degeneration confined to the substance of the meniscus. These results suggest that a meniscal tear is unlikely when MR scans show a focus of high signal in a meniscus that does not unequivocally extend to involve the surface of the meniscus.

AB - On MR images of the knee it is sometimes impossible to determine with confidence if a focus of high signal in the meniscus is confined to the substance of the meniscus or if it extends to involve the surface. This is a critical differentiation because the latter represents meniscal tears that can be found and treated at arthroscopy, whereas the former represents degeneration, tears, or perhaps normal variants that cannot be detected or treated arthroscopically. We make an equivocal diagnosis of a tear when it is difficult to decide if signal in a meniscus involves the meniscal surface. We studied MR scans of the knee in 142 consecutive patients for the presence of such equivocal tears. Their prevalence was 14% (20/142); 17 were in the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus and three were in the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. In 13 cases with arthroscopy/arthrotomy correlation, no tears were found. In one of the 20 patients in whom the meniscus was removed during arthroplasty, histologic examination of the meniscus showed separation of collagen bundles, which was caused by meniscal degeneration confined to the substance of the meniscus. These results suggest that a meniscal tear is unlikely when MR scans show a focus of high signal in a meniscus that does not unequivocally extend to involve the surface of the meniscus.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026093511&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026093511&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2214/ajr.156.2.1898808

DO - 10.2214/ajr.156.2.1898808

M3 - Article

C2 - 1898808

AN - SCOPUS:0026093511

VL - 156

SP - 333

EP - 336

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 2

ER -