Moral versus Social-conventional Reasoning: A narrative and cultural critique

Carol S. Witherell, Carolyn Pope Edwards

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We suggest in this paper that attempts to segregate social-conventional reasoning from the moral domain may represent an artifactual division, one that ignores major philosophic and psychological traditions and cultural constructs regarding the moral self. We address such issues as the individual, social, and relational dimensions of morality; the cultural context of moral development and behavior; and whether morality is solely a matter of justice, harm and welfare considerations, or concerned as well with culturally variable definitions of the good self and the good society, with role obligations, and with caring and affective aspects of human experience. We conclude with a call for continuing narrative and anthropological approaches to the study of moral development in order to reach a fuller understanding of the multiple facets of moral life.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)293-304
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Moral Education
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1991

Fingerprint

Cultural Critique
Conventional
Moral Development
Morality
Justice
Psychological
Harm
Human Experience
Cultural Context
Affective
Obligation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Religious studies

Cite this

Moral versus Social-conventional Reasoning : A narrative and cultural critique. / Witherell, Carol S.; Edwards, Carolyn Pope.

In: Journal of Moral Education, Vol. 20, No. 3, 01.01.1991, p. 293-304.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Witherell, Carol S. ; Edwards, Carolyn Pope. / Moral versus Social-conventional Reasoning : A narrative and cultural critique. In: Journal of Moral Education. 1991 ; Vol. 20, No. 3. pp. 293-304.
@article{15247f2c0cd0459eaa94ab1f2339dc79,
title = "Moral versus Social-conventional Reasoning: A narrative and cultural critique",
abstract = "We suggest in this paper that attempts to segregate social-conventional reasoning from the moral domain may represent an artifactual division, one that ignores major philosophic and psychological traditions and cultural constructs regarding the moral self. We address such issues as the individual, social, and relational dimensions of morality; the cultural context of moral development and behavior; and whether morality is solely a matter of justice, harm and welfare considerations, or concerned as well with culturally variable definitions of the good self and the good society, with role obligations, and with caring and affective aspects of human experience. We conclude with a call for continuing narrative and anthropological approaches to the study of moral development in order to reach a fuller understanding of the multiple facets of moral life.",
author = "Witherell, {Carol S.} and Edwards, {Carolyn Pope}",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/0305724910200306",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "293--304",
journal = "Journal of Moral Education",
issn = "0305-7240",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Moral versus Social-conventional Reasoning

T2 - A narrative and cultural critique

AU - Witherell, Carol S.

AU - Edwards, Carolyn Pope

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - We suggest in this paper that attempts to segregate social-conventional reasoning from the moral domain may represent an artifactual division, one that ignores major philosophic and psychological traditions and cultural constructs regarding the moral self. We address such issues as the individual, social, and relational dimensions of morality; the cultural context of moral development and behavior; and whether morality is solely a matter of justice, harm and welfare considerations, or concerned as well with culturally variable definitions of the good self and the good society, with role obligations, and with caring and affective aspects of human experience. We conclude with a call for continuing narrative and anthropological approaches to the study of moral development in order to reach a fuller understanding of the multiple facets of moral life.

AB - We suggest in this paper that attempts to segregate social-conventional reasoning from the moral domain may represent an artifactual division, one that ignores major philosophic and psychological traditions and cultural constructs regarding the moral self. We address such issues as the individual, social, and relational dimensions of morality; the cultural context of moral development and behavior; and whether morality is solely a matter of justice, harm and welfare considerations, or concerned as well with culturally variable definitions of the good self and the good society, with role obligations, and with caring and affective aspects of human experience. We conclude with a call for continuing narrative and anthropological approaches to the study of moral development in order to reach a fuller understanding of the multiple facets of moral life.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002335575&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0002335575&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0305724910200306

DO - 10.1080/0305724910200306

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0002335575

VL - 20

SP - 293

EP - 304

JO - Journal of Moral Education

JF - Journal of Moral Education

SN - 0305-7240

IS - 3

ER -