Modelling activities integrating construction and simulation supported explanatory and evaluative reasoning

Gretchen P. King, Heather Bergan-Roller, Nicholas Galt, Tomáš Helikar, Joseph T. Dauer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Model-based instruction offers numerous benefits to students, including increased content knowledge and critical thinking. This study explored the differences in the knowledge outcomes and reasoning processes employed by undergraduate students in an introductory biology lab as they constructed, revised, and simulated a computational model of a prokaryotic gene regulatory system. We analysed post-lesson conceptual models (n = 335) and audio-recorded small group discussions (n = 10) of students that either constructed and revised a computational model and then investigated a pre-constructed computational model or only investigated a pre-constructed computational model to determine the impact of constructing and revising a computational model. No significant differences were found between the mental models of students who constructed and revised a computational model and those who only simulated a pre-constructed computational model. However, this study demonstrated that constructing and revising a model before simulating it offered additional benefits to students by fostering deeper cognitive reasoning processes. Constructing and revising a model elicited more explanatory and evaluative reasoning and prompted students to discuss the underlying mechanisms of the biological system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1764-1786
Number of pages23
JournalInternational Journal of Science Education
Volume41
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

simulation
student
group discussion
small group
biology
instruction

Keywords

  • Undergraduate
  • biology
  • cognitive reasoning
  • computational model
  • student reasoning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Modelling activities integrating construction and simulation supported explanatory and evaluative reasoning. / King, Gretchen P.; Bergan-Roller, Heather; Galt, Nicholas; Helikar, Tomáš; Dauer, Joseph T.

In: International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 41, No. 13, 01.01.2019, p. 1764-1786.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

King, Gretchen P. ; Bergan-Roller, Heather ; Galt, Nicholas ; Helikar, Tomáš ; Dauer, Joseph T. / Modelling activities integrating construction and simulation supported explanatory and evaluative reasoning. In: International Journal of Science Education. 2019 ; Vol. 41, No. 13. pp. 1764-1786.
@article{2d194fa999cf4fb89ad355d6702d2693,
title = "Modelling activities integrating construction and simulation supported explanatory and evaluative reasoning",
abstract = "Model-based instruction offers numerous benefits to students, including increased content knowledge and critical thinking. This study explored the differences in the knowledge outcomes and reasoning processes employed by undergraduate students in an introductory biology lab as they constructed, revised, and simulated a computational model of a prokaryotic gene regulatory system. We analysed post-lesson conceptual models (n = 335) and audio-recorded small group discussions (n = 10) of students that either constructed and revised a computational model and then investigated a pre-constructed computational model or only investigated a pre-constructed computational model to determine the impact of constructing and revising a computational model. No significant differences were found between the mental models of students who constructed and revised a computational model and those who only simulated a pre-constructed computational model. However, this study demonstrated that constructing and revising a model before simulating it offered additional benefits to students by fostering deeper cognitive reasoning processes. Constructing and revising a model elicited more explanatory and evaluative reasoning and prompted students to discuss the underlying mechanisms of the biological system.",
keywords = "Undergraduate, biology, cognitive reasoning, computational model, student reasoning",
author = "King, {Gretchen P.} and Heather Bergan-Roller and Nicholas Galt and Tom{\'a}š Helikar and Dauer, {Joseph T.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09500693.2019.1640914",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "1764--1786",
journal = "International Journal of Science Education",
issn = "0950-0693",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modelling activities integrating construction and simulation supported explanatory and evaluative reasoning

AU - King, Gretchen P.

AU - Bergan-Roller, Heather

AU - Galt, Nicholas

AU - Helikar, Tomáš

AU - Dauer, Joseph T.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Model-based instruction offers numerous benefits to students, including increased content knowledge and critical thinking. This study explored the differences in the knowledge outcomes and reasoning processes employed by undergraduate students in an introductory biology lab as they constructed, revised, and simulated a computational model of a prokaryotic gene regulatory system. We analysed post-lesson conceptual models (n = 335) and audio-recorded small group discussions (n = 10) of students that either constructed and revised a computational model and then investigated a pre-constructed computational model or only investigated a pre-constructed computational model to determine the impact of constructing and revising a computational model. No significant differences were found between the mental models of students who constructed and revised a computational model and those who only simulated a pre-constructed computational model. However, this study demonstrated that constructing and revising a model before simulating it offered additional benefits to students by fostering deeper cognitive reasoning processes. Constructing and revising a model elicited more explanatory and evaluative reasoning and prompted students to discuss the underlying mechanisms of the biological system.

AB - Model-based instruction offers numerous benefits to students, including increased content knowledge and critical thinking. This study explored the differences in the knowledge outcomes and reasoning processes employed by undergraduate students in an introductory biology lab as they constructed, revised, and simulated a computational model of a prokaryotic gene regulatory system. We analysed post-lesson conceptual models (n = 335) and audio-recorded small group discussions (n = 10) of students that either constructed and revised a computational model and then investigated a pre-constructed computational model or only investigated a pre-constructed computational model to determine the impact of constructing and revising a computational model. No significant differences were found between the mental models of students who constructed and revised a computational model and those who only simulated a pre-constructed computational model. However, this study demonstrated that constructing and revising a model before simulating it offered additional benefits to students by fostering deeper cognitive reasoning processes. Constructing and revising a model elicited more explanatory and evaluative reasoning and prompted students to discuss the underlying mechanisms of the biological system.

KW - Undergraduate

KW - biology

KW - cognitive reasoning

KW - computational model

KW - student reasoning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070310149&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070310149&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09500693.2019.1640914

DO - 10.1080/09500693.2019.1640914

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85070310149

VL - 41

SP - 1764

EP - 1786

JO - International Journal of Science Education

JF - International Journal of Science Education

SN - 0950-0693

IS - 13

ER -