Modeling Decisions to Use Tube Feeding in Seriously Ill Patients

D. G. Smith, Robert Swift Wigton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Clinical decisions to use life-sustaining technologies, such as tube feeding in seriously ill patients, depend on many important factors. Using case simulations, we analyzed the decisions of students, housestaff, and faculty of Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, to use tube feeding in seriously ill patients. Although patient preference was the most important factor for most respondents, we observed three different patterns of decision strategies. Those in the first group, the autonomists (34% of respondents), considered only patient preference; those in the second group, the mixed strategists (56% of respondents), included patient preference among other important factors; and those in the third group, the paternalists (10% of respondents), used factors other than patient preference. More experienced clinicians and those individuals who believed tube feeding represented an extraordinary level of care were significantly less likely to begin tube feeding in the case simulations. Description of these individual decision strategies and elucidation of the important physician characteristics can help identify the potential ethical dilemmas in these different clinical decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1242-1245
Number of pages4
JournalArchives of Internal Medicine
Volume147
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1987

Fingerprint

Decision Support Techniques
Patient Preference
Enteral Nutrition
Medicine
Students
Technology
Physicians
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Modeling Decisions to Use Tube Feeding in Seriously Ill Patients. / Smith, D. G.; Wigton, Robert Swift.

In: Archives of Internal Medicine, Vol. 147, No. 7, 01.01.1987, p. 1242-1245.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3148b88c37dd4191b0c1f9f7ec216b44,
title = "Modeling Decisions to Use Tube Feeding in Seriously Ill Patients",
abstract = "Clinical decisions to use life-sustaining technologies, such as tube feeding in seriously ill patients, depend on many important factors. Using case simulations, we analyzed the decisions of students, housestaff, and faculty of Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, to use tube feeding in seriously ill patients. Although patient preference was the most important factor for most respondents, we observed three different patterns of decision strategies. Those in the first group, the autonomists (34{\%} of respondents), considered only patient preference; those in the second group, the mixed strategists (56{\%} of respondents), included patient preference among other important factors; and those in the third group, the paternalists (10{\%} of respondents), used factors other than patient preference. More experienced clinicians and those individuals who believed tube feeding represented an extraordinary level of care were significantly less likely to begin tube feeding in the case simulations. Description of these individual decision strategies and elucidation of the important physician characteristics can help identify the potential ethical dilemmas in these different clinical decisions.",
author = "Smith, {D. G.} and Wigton, {Robert Swift}",
year = "1987",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/archinte.1987.00370070056009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "147",
pages = "1242--1245",
journal = "JAMA Internal Medicine",
issn = "2168-6106",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling Decisions to Use Tube Feeding in Seriously Ill Patients

AU - Smith, D. G.

AU - Wigton, Robert Swift

PY - 1987/1/1

Y1 - 1987/1/1

N2 - Clinical decisions to use life-sustaining technologies, such as tube feeding in seriously ill patients, depend on many important factors. Using case simulations, we analyzed the decisions of students, housestaff, and faculty of Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, to use tube feeding in seriously ill patients. Although patient preference was the most important factor for most respondents, we observed three different patterns of decision strategies. Those in the first group, the autonomists (34% of respondents), considered only patient preference; those in the second group, the mixed strategists (56% of respondents), included patient preference among other important factors; and those in the third group, the paternalists (10% of respondents), used factors other than patient preference. More experienced clinicians and those individuals who believed tube feeding represented an extraordinary level of care were significantly less likely to begin tube feeding in the case simulations. Description of these individual decision strategies and elucidation of the important physician characteristics can help identify the potential ethical dilemmas in these different clinical decisions.

AB - Clinical decisions to use life-sustaining technologies, such as tube feeding in seriously ill patients, depend on many important factors. Using case simulations, we analyzed the decisions of students, housestaff, and faculty of Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, to use tube feeding in seriously ill patients. Although patient preference was the most important factor for most respondents, we observed three different patterns of decision strategies. Those in the first group, the autonomists (34% of respondents), considered only patient preference; those in the second group, the mixed strategists (56% of respondents), included patient preference among other important factors; and those in the third group, the paternalists (10% of respondents), used factors other than patient preference. More experienced clinicians and those individuals who believed tube feeding represented an extraordinary level of care were significantly less likely to begin tube feeding in the case simulations. Description of these individual decision strategies and elucidation of the important physician characteristics can help identify the potential ethical dilemmas in these different clinical decisions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023212614&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023212614&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archinte.1987.00370070056009

DO - 10.1001/archinte.1987.00370070056009

M3 - Article

VL - 147

SP - 1242

EP - 1245

JO - JAMA Internal Medicine

JF - JAMA Internal Medicine

SN - 2168-6106

IS - 7

ER -