Minimally invasive incisional herniorrhaphy

A review of 208 cases

C. T. Frantzides, Mark Alan Carlson, J. G. Zografakis, A. K. Madan, R. E. Moore

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive incisional herniorrhaphy has become an accepted approach for incisional hernia. However, the ideal technique for this procedure is not known. The authors present their technique and personal experience with minimally invasive incisional herniorrhaphy. Methods: A retrospective review investigated 208 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive incisional hernia repair under the supervision of a single surgeon between 1995 and 2002. Results: An intraperitoneal mesh repair was performed in all cases. There were no conversions. The mean operative time was 2.1 h (range, 0.8-4.5 h). The mean length of hospital stay was 2.5 days (range, 0-13 days). There were six complications, including two bowel perforations, and zero mortality. There were three recurrences during the follow-up period, which ranged from 6 to 72 months (median, 24 months). Conclusions: Minimally invasive incisional herniorrhaphy yielded an acceptable morbidity and recurrence rate during the follow-up period. The outcome compares favorably with that for open incisional hernia repair. Although long-term follow-up evaluation is desirable, the data support the contention that the minimally invasive approach is an appropriate option for incisional hernia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1488-1491
Number of pages4
JournalSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Volume18
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2004

Fingerprint

Herniorrhaphy
Length of Stay
Recurrence
Operative Time
Morbidity
Mortality
Incisional Hernia

Keywords

  • Incisional or ventral hernia
  • Laparoscopic incisional herniorrhaphy
  • Minimally invasive surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Minimally invasive incisional herniorrhaphy : A review of 208 cases. / Frantzides, C. T.; Carlson, Mark Alan; Zografakis, J. G.; Madan, A. K.; Moore, R. E.

In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, Vol. 18, No. 10, 01.10.2004, p. 1488-1491.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Frantzides, C. T. ; Carlson, Mark Alan ; Zografakis, J. G. ; Madan, A. K. ; Moore, R. E. / Minimally invasive incisional herniorrhaphy : A review of 208 cases. In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. 2004 ; Vol. 18, No. 10. pp. 1488-1491.
@article{ee72c8e556fd42349eae21881b26ac40,
title = "Minimally invasive incisional herniorrhaphy: A review of 208 cases",
abstract = "Background: Minimally invasive incisional herniorrhaphy has become an accepted approach for incisional hernia. However, the ideal technique for this procedure is not known. The authors present their technique and personal experience with minimally invasive incisional herniorrhaphy. Methods: A retrospective review investigated 208 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive incisional hernia repair under the supervision of a single surgeon between 1995 and 2002. Results: An intraperitoneal mesh repair was performed in all cases. There were no conversions. The mean operative time was 2.1 h (range, 0.8-4.5 h). The mean length of hospital stay was 2.5 days (range, 0-13 days). There were six complications, including two bowel perforations, and zero mortality. There were three recurrences during the follow-up period, which ranged from 6 to 72 months (median, 24 months). Conclusions: Minimally invasive incisional herniorrhaphy yielded an acceptable morbidity and recurrence rate during the follow-up period. The outcome compares favorably with that for open incisional hernia repair. Although long-term follow-up evaluation is desirable, the data support the contention that the minimally invasive approach is an appropriate option for incisional hernia.",
keywords = "Incisional or ventral hernia, Laparoscopic incisional herniorrhaphy, Minimally invasive surgery",
author = "Frantzides, {C. T.} and Carlson, {Mark Alan} and Zografakis, {J. G.} and Madan, {A. K.} and Moore, {R. E.}",
year = "2004",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-004-8105-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "1488--1491",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimally invasive incisional herniorrhaphy

T2 - A review of 208 cases

AU - Frantzides, C. T.

AU - Carlson, Mark Alan

AU - Zografakis, J. G.

AU - Madan, A. K.

AU - Moore, R. E.

PY - 2004/10/1

Y1 - 2004/10/1

N2 - Background: Minimally invasive incisional herniorrhaphy has become an accepted approach for incisional hernia. However, the ideal technique for this procedure is not known. The authors present their technique and personal experience with minimally invasive incisional herniorrhaphy. Methods: A retrospective review investigated 208 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive incisional hernia repair under the supervision of a single surgeon between 1995 and 2002. Results: An intraperitoneal mesh repair was performed in all cases. There were no conversions. The mean operative time was 2.1 h (range, 0.8-4.5 h). The mean length of hospital stay was 2.5 days (range, 0-13 days). There were six complications, including two bowel perforations, and zero mortality. There were three recurrences during the follow-up period, which ranged from 6 to 72 months (median, 24 months). Conclusions: Minimally invasive incisional herniorrhaphy yielded an acceptable morbidity and recurrence rate during the follow-up period. The outcome compares favorably with that for open incisional hernia repair. Although long-term follow-up evaluation is desirable, the data support the contention that the minimally invasive approach is an appropriate option for incisional hernia.

AB - Background: Minimally invasive incisional herniorrhaphy has become an accepted approach for incisional hernia. However, the ideal technique for this procedure is not known. The authors present their technique and personal experience with minimally invasive incisional herniorrhaphy. Methods: A retrospective review investigated 208 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive incisional hernia repair under the supervision of a single surgeon between 1995 and 2002. Results: An intraperitoneal mesh repair was performed in all cases. There were no conversions. The mean operative time was 2.1 h (range, 0.8-4.5 h). The mean length of hospital stay was 2.5 days (range, 0-13 days). There were six complications, including two bowel perforations, and zero mortality. There were three recurrences during the follow-up period, which ranged from 6 to 72 months (median, 24 months). Conclusions: Minimally invasive incisional herniorrhaphy yielded an acceptable morbidity and recurrence rate during the follow-up period. The outcome compares favorably with that for open incisional hernia repair. Although long-term follow-up evaluation is desirable, the data support the contention that the minimally invasive approach is an appropriate option for incisional hernia.

KW - Incisional or ventral hernia

KW - Laparoscopic incisional herniorrhaphy

KW - Minimally invasive surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4744340018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4744340018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-004-8105-9

DO - 10.1007/s00464-004-8105-9

M3 - Review article

VL - 18

SP - 1488

EP - 1491

JO - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

JF - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 10

ER -