Midwest or Lesbian? Gender, Rurality, and Sexuality

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research suggests a gendered dimension to the geography of sexual minorities, as gay couples are more likely to live in cities than are lesbian couples. Using data from 60 interviews with rural gays and lesbians, this article employs an intersectional analysis of the mutually constitutive relationships among place, gender, and sexuality in order to assess how acceptance of gays and lesbians in small towns is gendered. Findings indicate that femininity aligns with gay sexuality but not rurality. In contrast, masculinity underpins both the categories "rural" and "lesbian." Furthermore, both lesbian women and gay men gain acceptance in rural areas by doing masculinity. This analysis indicates that masculinity is not something to which only male bodies are privy. In contrast to prior work, it shows one form of female masculinity that is normative rather than transgressive. The analysis also reveals that the meanings of gender presentations vary by geographical context.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)825-848
Number of pages24
JournalGender and Society
Volume26
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 19 2012

Fingerprint

masculinity
sexuality
gender
acceptance
small town
femininity
rural area
minority
geography
Sexuality
Lesbian
interview
Masculinity
Acceptance

Keywords

  • class
  • gender
  • men/masculinity
  • race
  • sexuality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Midwest or Lesbian? Gender, Rurality, and Sexuality. / Kazyak, Emily.

In: Gender and Society, Vol. 26, No. 6, 19.11.2012, p. 825-848.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a997c82e70544bfaa4fc07995358068a,
title = "Midwest or Lesbian? Gender, Rurality, and Sexuality",
abstract = "Research suggests a gendered dimension to the geography of sexual minorities, as gay couples are more likely to live in cities than are lesbian couples. Using data from 60 interviews with rural gays and lesbians, this article employs an intersectional analysis of the mutually constitutive relationships among place, gender, and sexuality in order to assess how acceptance of gays and lesbians in small towns is gendered. Findings indicate that femininity aligns with gay sexuality but not rurality. In contrast, masculinity underpins both the categories {"}rural{"} and {"}lesbian.{"} Furthermore, both lesbian women and gay men gain acceptance in rural areas by doing masculinity. This analysis indicates that masculinity is not something to which only male bodies are privy. In contrast to prior work, it shows one form of female masculinity that is normative rather than transgressive. The analysis also reveals that the meanings of gender presentations vary by geographical context.",
keywords = "class, gender, men/masculinity, race, sexuality",
author = "Emily Kazyak",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1177/0891243212458361",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "825--848",
journal = "Gender and Society",
issn = "0891-2432",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Midwest or Lesbian? Gender, Rurality, and Sexuality

AU - Kazyak, Emily

PY - 2012/11/19

Y1 - 2012/11/19

N2 - Research suggests a gendered dimension to the geography of sexual minorities, as gay couples are more likely to live in cities than are lesbian couples. Using data from 60 interviews with rural gays and lesbians, this article employs an intersectional analysis of the mutually constitutive relationships among place, gender, and sexuality in order to assess how acceptance of gays and lesbians in small towns is gendered. Findings indicate that femininity aligns with gay sexuality but not rurality. In contrast, masculinity underpins both the categories "rural" and "lesbian." Furthermore, both lesbian women and gay men gain acceptance in rural areas by doing masculinity. This analysis indicates that masculinity is not something to which only male bodies are privy. In contrast to prior work, it shows one form of female masculinity that is normative rather than transgressive. The analysis also reveals that the meanings of gender presentations vary by geographical context.

AB - Research suggests a gendered dimension to the geography of sexual minorities, as gay couples are more likely to live in cities than are lesbian couples. Using data from 60 interviews with rural gays and lesbians, this article employs an intersectional analysis of the mutually constitutive relationships among place, gender, and sexuality in order to assess how acceptance of gays and lesbians in small towns is gendered. Findings indicate that femininity aligns with gay sexuality but not rurality. In contrast, masculinity underpins both the categories "rural" and "lesbian." Furthermore, both lesbian women and gay men gain acceptance in rural areas by doing masculinity. This analysis indicates that masculinity is not something to which only male bodies are privy. In contrast to prior work, it shows one form of female masculinity that is normative rather than transgressive. The analysis also reveals that the meanings of gender presentations vary by geographical context.

KW - class

KW - gender

KW - men/masculinity

KW - race

KW - sexuality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869052450&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869052450&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0891243212458361

DO - 10.1177/0891243212458361

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84869052450

VL - 26

SP - 825

EP - 848

JO - Gender and Society

JF - Gender and Society

SN - 0891-2432

IS - 6

ER -