Methods Employed in Monitoring and Evaluating Field and Laboratory Systems in the ANISA Study: Ensuring Quality

for the ANISA Methods Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The Aetiology of Neonatal Infection in South Asia (ANISA) study maintains operations in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan. We developed and deployed a multilayered monitoring system to measure performance indicators of field sites and laboratory operations. This system allows for real-time provision of feedback to study site teams and project stakeholders. The goal of this monitoring and evaluation system is to promote optimal performance and consistency in protocol application at all sites over the course of the study, thereby safeguarding the validity of project findings. This article describes each of the interdependent monitoring layers that were conceptualized, developed and employed by the ANISA coordination team. Methods: Layers of monitoring include site-level, central and database-related activities along with periodic site visitation. We provide a number of real-world examples of how feedback from the ANISA monitoring system directly informs a number of crucial decisions and course corrections during the project. Conclusion: The ANISA monitoring system represents a transparent, understandable and practical resource for development of project monitoring systems in complex multisite health research projects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S39-S44
JournalPediatric Infectious Disease Journal
Volume35
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2016

Fingerprint

Infection
Bangladesh
Pakistan
Computer Systems
India
Databases
Health
Research

Keywords

  • ANISA
  • monitoring and evaluation
  • multi-site
  • neonatal
  • project design
  • surveillance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Methods Employed in Monitoring and Evaluating Field and Laboratory Systems in the ANISA Study : Ensuring Quality. / for the ANISA Methods Group.

In: Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, Vol. 35, No. 5, 01.05.2016, p. S39-S44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bf46e5c3f7644886a9a137ee916fb686,
title = "Methods Employed in Monitoring and Evaluating Field and Laboratory Systems in the ANISA Study: Ensuring Quality",
abstract = "Background: The Aetiology of Neonatal Infection in South Asia (ANISA) study maintains operations in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan. We developed and deployed a multilayered monitoring system to measure performance indicators of field sites and laboratory operations. This system allows for real-time provision of feedback to study site teams and project stakeholders. The goal of this monitoring and evaluation system is to promote optimal performance and consistency in protocol application at all sites over the course of the study, thereby safeguarding the validity of project findings. This article describes each of the interdependent monitoring layers that were conceptualized, developed and employed by the ANISA coordination team. Methods: Layers of monitoring include site-level, central and database-related activities along with periodic site visitation. We provide a number of real-world examples of how feedback from the ANISA monitoring system directly informs a number of crucial decisions and course corrections during the project. Conclusion: The ANISA monitoring system represents a transparent, understandable and practical resource for development of project monitoring systems in complex multisite health research projects.",
keywords = "ANISA, monitoring and evaluation, multi-site, neonatal, project design, surveillance",
author = "{for the ANISA Methods Group} and Connor, {Nicholas E.} and Islam, {Mohammad Shahidul} and Arvay, {Melissa L.} and Baqui, {Abdullah H.} and Zaidi, {Anita K.} and Soofi, {Sajid B.} and Pinaki Panigrahi and Anuradha Bose and Maksuda Islam and Arifeen, {Shams El} and Saha, {Samir K.} and Qazi, {Shamim A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/INF.0000000000001105",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "S39--S44",
journal = "Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal",
issn = "0891-3668",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methods Employed in Monitoring and Evaluating Field and Laboratory Systems in the ANISA Study

T2 - Ensuring Quality

AU - for the ANISA Methods Group

AU - Connor, Nicholas E.

AU - Islam, Mohammad Shahidul

AU - Arvay, Melissa L.

AU - Baqui, Abdullah H.

AU - Zaidi, Anita K.

AU - Soofi, Sajid B.

AU - Panigrahi, Pinaki

AU - Bose, Anuradha

AU - Islam, Maksuda

AU - Arifeen, Shams El

AU - Saha, Samir K.

AU - Qazi, Shamim A.

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - Background: The Aetiology of Neonatal Infection in South Asia (ANISA) study maintains operations in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan. We developed and deployed a multilayered monitoring system to measure performance indicators of field sites and laboratory operations. This system allows for real-time provision of feedback to study site teams and project stakeholders. The goal of this monitoring and evaluation system is to promote optimal performance and consistency in protocol application at all sites over the course of the study, thereby safeguarding the validity of project findings. This article describes each of the interdependent monitoring layers that were conceptualized, developed and employed by the ANISA coordination team. Methods: Layers of monitoring include site-level, central and database-related activities along with periodic site visitation. We provide a number of real-world examples of how feedback from the ANISA monitoring system directly informs a number of crucial decisions and course corrections during the project. Conclusion: The ANISA monitoring system represents a transparent, understandable and practical resource for development of project monitoring systems in complex multisite health research projects.

AB - Background: The Aetiology of Neonatal Infection in South Asia (ANISA) study maintains operations in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan. We developed and deployed a multilayered monitoring system to measure performance indicators of field sites and laboratory operations. This system allows for real-time provision of feedback to study site teams and project stakeholders. The goal of this monitoring and evaluation system is to promote optimal performance and consistency in protocol application at all sites over the course of the study, thereby safeguarding the validity of project findings. This article describes each of the interdependent monitoring layers that were conceptualized, developed and employed by the ANISA coordination team. Methods: Layers of monitoring include site-level, central and database-related activities along with periodic site visitation. We provide a number of real-world examples of how feedback from the ANISA monitoring system directly informs a number of crucial decisions and course corrections during the project. Conclusion: The ANISA monitoring system represents a transparent, understandable and practical resource for development of project monitoring systems in complex multisite health research projects.

KW - ANISA

KW - monitoring and evaluation

KW - multi-site

KW - neonatal

KW - project design

KW - surveillance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965137327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965137327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/INF.0000000000001105

DO - 10.1097/INF.0000000000001105

M3 - Article

C2 - 27070063

AN - SCOPUS:84965137327

VL - 35

SP - S39-S44

JO - Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal

JF - Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal

SN - 0891-3668

IS - 5

ER -