Methodology for evaluating dredged material alternatives using risk-cost analysis under uncertainty

John S Stansbury, I. Bogardi, W. E. Kelly

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

A methodology and a case example was presented at the 1989 Conference on Risk-Based Decision Making in Water Resources, Santa Barbara, to perform risk-cost analysis for dredged material alternatives. This methodology is extended to account for uncertainties using a fuzzy set approach. Disposal of contaminated dredged material may pose risks to ecological and human populations through direct contact or indirect contact, such as through the food chain. These risks may be reduced by incorporating measures to confine the contaminated dredged material; however, these confinement measures may increase disposal costs significantly. Risk-cost trade-off analysis can be used to evaluate potential disposal alternatives and select those alternatives that are both environmentally sound and cost effective. However, risk and cost assessments for dredged material management alternatives are often associated with very large uncertainties. If risk-cost analysis is conducted without considering these uncertainties, inappropriate management policies may result. On the other hand, considering these uncertainties may cause difficulties in decision making if they make management alternatives effectively indistinguishable. Therefore, a risk-cost analysis methodology that uses fuzzy set methods to incorporate uncertainty directly into the risk-cost trade-off decision framework is developed. Carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic risks to humans and physical (e.g., burial and habitat disruption) and toxicological risks to ecological species are estimated for each of several disposal alternatives. Composite programming, a multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) method, is used to trade off the risks and costs for these disposal alternatives. Uncertainties are encoded into the composite programming algorithm by means of fuzzy set membership functions. The final risk-cost trade-off distance for each management option is computed as a fuzzy number allowing the disposal alternatives with their associated uncertainties to be compared and ranked.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationRisk-Based Decision Making in Water Resources V, Proceedings of the Conference
PublisherPubl by ASCE
Pages236-259
Number of pages24
ISBN (Print)087262899X
StatePublished - Dec 1 1992
EventProceedings of the 5th Conference on Risk-Based Decision Making in Water Resources - Santa Barbara, CA, USA
Duration: Nov 3 1991Nov 8 1991

Publication series

NameRisk-Based Decision Making in Water Resources V, Proceedings of the Conference

Other

OtherProceedings of the 5th Conference on Risk-Based Decision Making in Water Resources
CitySanta Barbara, CA, USA
Period11/3/9111/8/91

Fingerprint

Costs
Fuzzy sets
Decision making
Uncertainty
Composite materials
Membership functions
Water resources
Acoustic waves

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Stansbury, J. S., Bogardi, I., & Kelly, W. E. (1992). Methodology for evaluating dredged material alternatives using risk-cost analysis under uncertainty. In Risk-Based Decision Making in Water Resources V, Proceedings of the Conference (pp. 236-259). (Risk-Based Decision Making in Water Resources V, Proceedings of the Conference). Publ by ASCE.

Methodology for evaluating dredged material alternatives using risk-cost analysis under uncertainty. / Stansbury, John S; Bogardi, I.; Kelly, W. E.

Risk-Based Decision Making in Water Resources V, Proceedings of the Conference. Publ by ASCE, 1992. p. 236-259 (Risk-Based Decision Making in Water Resources V, Proceedings of the Conference).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Stansbury, JS, Bogardi, I & Kelly, WE 1992, Methodology for evaluating dredged material alternatives using risk-cost analysis under uncertainty. in Risk-Based Decision Making in Water Resources V, Proceedings of the Conference. Risk-Based Decision Making in Water Resources V, Proceedings of the Conference, Publ by ASCE, pp. 236-259, Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Risk-Based Decision Making in Water Resources, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, 11/3/91.
Stansbury JS, Bogardi I, Kelly WE. Methodology for evaluating dredged material alternatives using risk-cost analysis under uncertainty. In Risk-Based Decision Making in Water Resources V, Proceedings of the Conference. Publ by ASCE. 1992. p. 236-259. (Risk-Based Decision Making in Water Resources V, Proceedings of the Conference).
Stansbury, John S ; Bogardi, I. ; Kelly, W. E. / Methodology for evaluating dredged material alternatives using risk-cost analysis under uncertainty. Risk-Based Decision Making in Water Resources V, Proceedings of the Conference. Publ by ASCE, 1992. pp. 236-259 (Risk-Based Decision Making in Water Resources V, Proceedings of the Conference).
@inproceedings{ba5edca4994c42059a405258d6c3972e,
title = "Methodology for evaluating dredged material alternatives using risk-cost analysis under uncertainty",
abstract = "A methodology and a case example was presented at the 1989 Conference on Risk-Based Decision Making in Water Resources, Santa Barbara, to perform risk-cost analysis for dredged material alternatives. This methodology is extended to account for uncertainties using a fuzzy set approach. Disposal of contaminated dredged material may pose risks to ecological and human populations through direct contact or indirect contact, such as through the food chain. These risks may be reduced by incorporating measures to confine the contaminated dredged material; however, these confinement measures may increase disposal costs significantly. Risk-cost trade-off analysis can be used to evaluate potential disposal alternatives and select those alternatives that are both environmentally sound and cost effective. However, risk and cost assessments for dredged material management alternatives are often associated with very large uncertainties. If risk-cost analysis is conducted without considering these uncertainties, inappropriate management policies may result. On the other hand, considering these uncertainties may cause difficulties in decision making if they make management alternatives effectively indistinguishable. Therefore, a risk-cost analysis methodology that uses fuzzy set methods to incorporate uncertainty directly into the risk-cost trade-off decision framework is developed. Carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic risks to humans and physical (e.g., burial and habitat disruption) and toxicological risks to ecological species are estimated for each of several disposal alternatives. Composite programming, a multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) method, is used to trade off the risks and costs for these disposal alternatives. Uncertainties are encoded into the composite programming algorithm by means of fuzzy set membership functions. The final risk-cost trade-off distance for each management option is computed as a fuzzy number allowing the disposal alternatives with their associated uncertainties to be compared and ranked.",
author = "Stansbury, {John S} and I. Bogardi and Kelly, {W. E.}",
year = "1992",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "087262899X",
series = "Risk-Based Decision Making in Water Resources V, Proceedings of the Conference",
publisher = "Publ by ASCE",
pages = "236--259",
booktitle = "Risk-Based Decision Making in Water Resources V, Proceedings of the Conference",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Methodology for evaluating dredged material alternatives using risk-cost analysis under uncertainty

AU - Stansbury, John S

AU - Bogardi, I.

AU - Kelly, W. E.

PY - 1992/12/1

Y1 - 1992/12/1

N2 - A methodology and a case example was presented at the 1989 Conference on Risk-Based Decision Making in Water Resources, Santa Barbara, to perform risk-cost analysis for dredged material alternatives. This methodology is extended to account for uncertainties using a fuzzy set approach. Disposal of contaminated dredged material may pose risks to ecological and human populations through direct contact or indirect contact, such as through the food chain. These risks may be reduced by incorporating measures to confine the contaminated dredged material; however, these confinement measures may increase disposal costs significantly. Risk-cost trade-off analysis can be used to evaluate potential disposal alternatives and select those alternatives that are both environmentally sound and cost effective. However, risk and cost assessments for dredged material management alternatives are often associated with very large uncertainties. If risk-cost analysis is conducted without considering these uncertainties, inappropriate management policies may result. On the other hand, considering these uncertainties may cause difficulties in decision making if they make management alternatives effectively indistinguishable. Therefore, a risk-cost analysis methodology that uses fuzzy set methods to incorporate uncertainty directly into the risk-cost trade-off decision framework is developed. Carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic risks to humans and physical (e.g., burial and habitat disruption) and toxicological risks to ecological species are estimated for each of several disposal alternatives. Composite programming, a multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) method, is used to trade off the risks and costs for these disposal alternatives. Uncertainties are encoded into the composite programming algorithm by means of fuzzy set membership functions. The final risk-cost trade-off distance for each management option is computed as a fuzzy number allowing the disposal alternatives with their associated uncertainties to be compared and ranked.

AB - A methodology and a case example was presented at the 1989 Conference on Risk-Based Decision Making in Water Resources, Santa Barbara, to perform risk-cost analysis for dredged material alternatives. This methodology is extended to account for uncertainties using a fuzzy set approach. Disposal of contaminated dredged material may pose risks to ecological and human populations through direct contact or indirect contact, such as through the food chain. These risks may be reduced by incorporating measures to confine the contaminated dredged material; however, these confinement measures may increase disposal costs significantly. Risk-cost trade-off analysis can be used to evaluate potential disposal alternatives and select those alternatives that are both environmentally sound and cost effective. However, risk and cost assessments for dredged material management alternatives are often associated with very large uncertainties. If risk-cost analysis is conducted without considering these uncertainties, inappropriate management policies may result. On the other hand, considering these uncertainties may cause difficulties in decision making if they make management alternatives effectively indistinguishable. Therefore, a risk-cost analysis methodology that uses fuzzy set methods to incorporate uncertainty directly into the risk-cost trade-off decision framework is developed. Carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic risks to humans and physical (e.g., burial and habitat disruption) and toxicological risks to ecological species are estimated for each of several disposal alternatives. Composite programming, a multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) method, is used to trade off the risks and costs for these disposal alternatives. Uncertainties are encoded into the composite programming algorithm by means of fuzzy set membership functions. The final risk-cost trade-off distance for each management option is computed as a fuzzy number allowing the disposal alternatives with their associated uncertainties to be compared and ranked.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027043839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027043839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 087262899X

T3 - Risk-Based Decision Making in Water Resources V, Proceedings of the Conference

SP - 236

EP - 259

BT - Risk-Based Decision Making in Water Resources V, Proceedings of the Conference

PB - Publ by ASCE

ER -