Methodological Challenges When Using Actigraphy in Research

Ann Malone Berger, Kimberly K. Wielgus, Stacey Young-McCaughan, Patricia Fischer, Lynne Farr, Kathryn A. Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

102 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Actigraphy has become a valuable clinical and research tool to objectively evaluate sleep, daytime activity, and circadian activity rhythms in healthy individuals as well as persons with primary and comorbid insomnia. However, procedures used for sampling, data processing, and analysis are not consistently reported in the literature. The wide variability in how actigraphy is reported makes it difficult to compare findings across studies. The procedures and reporting methods from 21 studies that used actigraphs to assess sleep and wake in adult patients with cancer are reviewed to highlight the differences in reporting strategies. Patients with cancer were chosen to illustrate the methodological challenges related to procedures and reporting in one population. The aim of this article was to advance standards of information presented in publications to enable comparisons across research studies that use actigraphy. Specific methodological challenges when using actigraphy in research include instrumentation, selection of pertinent variables, sampling, and data processing and analysis. Procedural decisions are outlined and discussed, and suggestions are made for standardized actigraphy information to include in research reports. More consistent procedures and reporting will advance the science of sleep, daytime activity, and circadian activity rhythms and their association with other health-related variables.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)191-199
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2008

Fingerprint

Actigraphy
Sleep
Research
Circadian Rhythm
Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders
Publications
Neoplasms
Health
Population

Keywords

  • Actigraph
  • activity
  • circadian rhythms
  • methods
  • sleep

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Methodological Challenges When Using Actigraphy in Research. / Berger, Ann Malone; Wielgus, Kimberly K.; Young-McCaughan, Stacey; Fischer, Patricia; Farr, Lynne; Lee, Kathryn A.

In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Vol. 36, No. 2, 01.08.2008, p. 191-199.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Berger, AM, Wielgus, KK, Young-McCaughan, S, Fischer, P, Farr, L & Lee, KA 2008, 'Methodological Challenges When Using Actigraphy in Research', Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 191-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.10.008
Berger, Ann Malone ; Wielgus, Kimberly K. ; Young-McCaughan, Stacey ; Fischer, Patricia ; Farr, Lynne ; Lee, Kathryn A. / Methodological Challenges When Using Actigraphy in Research. In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2008 ; Vol. 36, No. 2. pp. 191-199.
@article{ac2ee36990584571854b38e26b6fc191,
title = "Methodological Challenges When Using Actigraphy in Research",
abstract = "Actigraphy has become a valuable clinical and research tool to objectively evaluate sleep, daytime activity, and circadian activity rhythms in healthy individuals as well as persons with primary and comorbid insomnia. However, procedures used for sampling, data processing, and analysis are not consistently reported in the literature. The wide variability in how actigraphy is reported makes it difficult to compare findings across studies. The procedures and reporting methods from 21 studies that used actigraphs to assess sleep and wake in adult patients with cancer are reviewed to highlight the differences in reporting strategies. Patients with cancer were chosen to illustrate the methodological challenges related to procedures and reporting in one population. The aim of this article was to advance standards of information presented in publications to enable comparisons across research studies that use actigraphy. Specific methodological challenges when using actigraphy in research include instrumentation, selection of pertinent variables, sampling, and data processing and analysis. Procedural decisions are outlined and discussed, and suggestions are made for standardized actigraphy information to include in research reports. More consistent procedures and reporting will advance the science of sleep, daytime activity, and circadian activity rhythms and their association with other health-related variables.",
keywords = "Actigraph, activity, circadian rhythms, methods, sleep",
author = "Berger, {Ann Malone} and Wielgus, {Kimberly K.} and Stacey Young-McCaughan and Patricia Fischer and Lynne Farr and Lee, {Kathryn A.}",
year = "2008",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.10.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "191--199",
journal = "Journal of Pain and Symptom Management",
issn = "0885-3924",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methodological Challenges When Using Actigraphy in Research

AU - Berger, Ann Malone

AU - Wielgus, Kimberly K.

AU - Young-McCaughan, Stacey

AU - Fischer, Patricia

AU - Farr, Lynne

AU - Lee, Kathryn A.

PY - 2008/8/1

Y1 - 2008/8/1

N2 - Actigraphy has become a valuable clinical and research tool to objectively evaluate sleep, daytime activity, and circadian activity rhythms in healthy individuals as well as persons with primary and comorbid insomnia. However, procedures used for sampling, data processing, and analysis are not consistently reported in the literature. The wide variability in how actigraphy is reported makes it difficult to compare findings across studies. The procedures and reporting methods from 21 studies that used actigraphs to assess sleep and wake in adult patients with cancer are reviewed to highlight the differences in reporting strategies. Patients with cancer were chosen to illustrate the methodological challenges related to procedures and reporting in one population. The aim of this article was to advance standards of information presented in publications to enable comparisons across research studies that use actigraphy. Specific methodological challenges when using actigraphy in research include instrumentation, selection of pertinent variables, sampling, and data processing and analysis. Procedural decisions are outlined and discussed, and suggestions are made for standardized actigraphy information to include in research reports. More consistent procedures and reporting will advance the science of sleep, daytime activity, and circadian activity rhythms and their association with other health-related variables.

AB - Actigraphy has become a valuable clinical and research tool to objectively evaluate sleep, daytime activity, and circadian activity rhythms in healthy individuals as well as persons with primary and comorbid insomnia. However, procedures used for sampling, data processing, and analysis are not consistently reported in the literature. The wide variability in how actigraphy is reported makes it difficult to compare findings across studies. The procedures and reporting methods from 21 studies that used actigraphs to assess sleep and wake in adult patients with cancer are reviewed to highlight the differences in reporting strategies. Patients with cancer were chosen to illustrate the methodological challenges related to procedures and reporting in one population. The aim of this article was to advance standards of information presented in publications to enable comparisons across research studies that use actigraphy. Specific methodological challenges when using actigraphy in research include instrumentation, selection of pertinent variables, sampling, and data processing and analysis. Procedural decisions are outlined and discussed, and suggestions are made for standardized actigraphy information to include in research reports. More consistent procedures and reporting will advance the science of sleep, daytime activity, and circadian activity rhythms and their association with other health-related variables.

KW - Actigraph

KW - activity

KW - circadian rhythms

KW - methods

KW - sleep

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=47549112487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=47549112487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.10.008

DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.10.008

M3 - Review article

C2 - 18400460

AN - SCOPUS:47549112487

VL - 36

SP - 191

EP - 199

JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

SN - 0885-3924

IS - 2

ER -