Methanol and dimethyl ether from renewable hydrogen and carbon dioxide

Alternative fuels production and life-cycle assessment

Michael Matzen, Yasar Demirel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this work we investigate two renewably based alternative fuels; methanol and dimethyl ether. The ultimate feedstocks for production are wind-based electrolytic hydrogen and carbon dioxide captured from an ethanol fermentation process. Dimethyl ether production was modeled in ASPEN Plus using a previously simulated methanol production facility. The facilities use 18.6 metric tons (mt) of H2 and 138.4 mt CO2 per day. Methanol is produced at a rate 96.7 mt/day (99.5 wt%) and dimethyl ether is produced at a rate of 68.5 mt/day (99.6 wt%). A full comparative life-cycle assessment (cradle-to-grave) of both fuels was conducted to investigate their feasibility and sustainability. Renewable methanol and dimethyl ether results were independently compared and this renewable process was also compared to conventional production routes. Results show that production of dimethyl ether impacts the environment more than methanol production. However the combustion of methanol fuel evens out many of the emissions metrics compared to dimethyl ether. The largest environmental impact was found to be related to the fuel production stage for both fuels. Both biofuels were shown to be comparable to biomass-based gasification fuel production routes. Methanol and dimethyl ether from CO2 hydrogenation were shown outperform conventional petroleum based fuels, reducing greenhouse gas emissions 82–86%, minimizing other criteria pollutants (SOx, NOx, etc.) and reducing fossil fuel depletion by 82–91%. The inclusion of environmental impacts in feasibility analyses is of great importance in order to improve sustainable living practices. The results found here highlight the favorable feasibility of renewably produced methanol and dimethyl ether as alternative fuels.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1068-1077
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Cleaner Production
Volume139
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 15 2016

Fingerprint

alternative fuel
Alternative fuels
ether
methanol
Life cycle
Ethers
Carbon dioxide
Methanol
life cycle
carbon dioxide
hydrogen
Hydrogen
Environmental impact
environmental impact
Methanol fuels
Production cycle
Life cycle assessment
Biofuels
Gas emissions
Fossil fuels

Keywords

  • Alternative fuels
  • CO capture and utilization
  • Dimethyl ether production
  • Electrolytic hydrogen
  • Life-cycle assessment
  • Methanol production
  • Wind power

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

Methanol and dimethyl ether from renewable hydrogen and carbon dioxide : Alternative fuels production and life-cycle assessment. / Matzen, Michael; Demirel, Yasar.

In: Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 139, 15.12.2016, p. 1068-1077.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d65985e49171484fad8f7a7a19118589,
title = "Methanol and dimethyl ether from renewable hydrogen and carbon dioxide: Alternative fuels production and life-cycle assessment",
abstract = "In this work we investigate two renewably based alternative fuels; methanol and dimethyl ether. The ultimate feedstocks for production are wind-based electrolytic hydrogen and carbon dioxide captured from an ethanol fermentation process. Dimethyl ether production was modeled in ASPEN Plus using a previously simulated methanol production facility. The facilities use 18.6 metric tons (mt) of H2 and 138.4 mt CO2 per day. Methanol is produced at a rate 96.7 mt/day (99.5 wt{\%}) and dimethyl ether is produced at a rate of 68.5 mt/day (99.6 wt{\%}). A full comparative life-cycle assessment (cradle-to-grave) of both fuels was conducted to investigate their feasibility and sustainability. Renewable methanol and dimethyl ether results were independently compared and this renewable process was also compared to conventional production routes. Results show that production of dimethyl ether impacts the environment more than methanol production. However the combustion of methanol fuel evens out many of the emissions metrics compared to dimethyl ether. The largest environmental impact was found to be related to the fuel production stage for both fuels. Both biofuels were shown to be comparable to biomass-based gasification fuel production routes. Methanol and dimethyl ether from CO2 hydrogenation were shown outperform conventional petroleum based fuels, reducing greenhouse gas emissions 82–86{\%}, minimizing other criteria pollutants (SOx, NOx, etc.) and reducing fossil fuel depletion by 82–91{\%}. The inclusion of environmental impacts in feasibility analyses is of great importance in order to improve sustainable living practices. The results found here highlight the favorable feasibility of renewably produced methanol and dimethyl ether as alternative fuels.",
keywords = "Alternative fuels, CO capture and utilization, Dimethyl ether production, Electrolytic hydrogen, Life-cycle assessment, Methanol production, Wind power",
author = "Michael Matzen and Yasar Demirel",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.163",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "139",
pages = "1068--1077",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methanol and dimethyl ether from renewable hydrogen and carbon dioxide

T2 - Alternative fuels production and life-cycle assessment

AU - Matzen, Michael

AU - Demirel, Yasar

PY - 2016/12/15

Y1 - 2016/12/15

N2 - In this work we investigate two renewably based alternative fuels; methanol and dimethyl ether. The ultimate feedstocks for production are wind-based electrolytic hydrogen and carbon dioxide captured from an ethanol fermentation process. Dimethyl ether production was modeled in ASPEN Plus using a previously simulated methanol production facility. The facilities use 18.6 metric tons (mt) of H2 and 138.4 mt CO2 per day. Methanol is produced at a rate 96.7 mt/day (99.5 wt%) and dimethyl ether is produced at a rate of 68.5 mt/day (99.6 wt%). A full comparative life-cycle assessment (cradle-to-grave) of both fuels was conducted to investigate their feasibility and sustainability. Renewable methanol and dimethyl ether results were independently compared and this renewable process was also compared to conventional production routes. Results show that production of dimethyl ether impacts the environment more than methanol production. However the combustion of methanol fuel evens out many of the emissions metrics compared to dimethyl ether. The largest environmental impact was found to be related to the fuel production stage for both fuels. Both biofuels were shown to be comparable to biomass-based gasification fuel production routes. Methanol and dimethyl ether from CO2 hydrogenation were shown outperform conventional petroleum based fuels, reducing greenhouse gas emissions 82–86%, minimizing other criteria pollutants (SOx, NOx, etc.) and reducing fossil fuel depletion by 82–91%. The inclusion of environmental impacts in feasibility analyses is of great importance in order to improve sustainable living practices. The results found here highlight the favorable feasibility of renewably produced methanol and dimethyl ether as alternative fuels.

AB - In this work we investigate two renewably based alternative fuels; methanol and dimethyl ether. The ultimate feedstocks for production are wind-based electrolytic hydrogen and carbon dioxide captured from an ethanol fermentation process. Dimethyl ether production was modeled in ASPEN Plus using a previously simulated methanol production facility. The facilities use 18.6 metric tons (mt) of H2 and 138.4 mt CO2 per day. Methanol is produced at a rate 96.7 mt/day (99.5 wt%) and dimethyl ether is produced at a rate of 68.5 mt/day (99.6 wt%). A full comparative life-cycle assessment (cradle-to-grave) of both fuels was conducted to investigate their feasibility and sustainability. Renewable methanol and dimethyl ether results were independently compared and this renewable process was also compared to conventional production routes. Results show that production of dimethyl ether impacts the environment more than methanol production. However the combustion of methanol fuel evens out many of the emissions metrics compared to dimethyl ether. The largest environmental impact was found to be related to the fuel production stage for both fuels. Both biofuels were shown to be comparable to biomass-based gasification fuel production routes. Methanol and dimethyl ether from CO2 hydrogenation were shown outperform conventional petroleum based fuels, reducing greenhouse gas emissions 82–86%, minimizing other criteria pollutants (SOx, NOx, etc.) and reducing fossil fuel depletion by 82–91%. The inclusion of environmental impacts in feasibility analyses is of great importance in order to improve sustainable living practices. The results found here highlight the favorable feasibility of renewably produced methanol and dimethyl ether as alternative fuels.

KW - Alternative fuels

KW - CO capture and utilization

KW - Dimethyl ether production

KW - Electrolytic hydrogen

KW - Life-cycle assessment

KW - Methanol production

KW - Wind power

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84996588137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84996588137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.163

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.163

M3 - Article

VL - 139

SP - 1068

EP - 1077

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

ER -