Menstrual hygiene practices, WASH access and the risk of urogenital infection in women from Odisha, India

Padma Das, Kelly K. Baker, Ambarish Dutta, Tapoja Swain, Sunita Sahoo, Bhabani Sankar Das, Bijay Panda, Arati Nayak, Mary Bara, Bibiana Bilung, Pravas Ranjan Mishra, Pinaki Panigrahi, Sandy Cairncross, Belen Torondel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Menstrual hygiene management (MHM) practices vary worldwide and depend on the individual's socioeconomic status, personal preferences, local traditions and beliefs, and access to water and sanitation resources. MHM practices can be particularly unhygienic and inconvenient for girls and women in poorer settings. Little is known about whether unhygienic MHM practices increase a woman's exposure to urogenital infections, such as bacterial vaginosis (BV) and urinary tract infection (UTI). This study aimed to determine the association of MHM practices with urogenital infections, controlling for environmental drivers. A hospital-based case-control study was conducted on 486 women at Odisha, India. Cases and controls were recruited using a syndromic approach. Vaginal swabs were collected from all the participants and tested for BV status using Amsel's criteria. Urine samples were cultured to assess UTI status. Socioeconomic status, clinical symptoms and reproductive history, and MHM and water and sanitation practices were obtained by standardised questionnaire. A total of 486 women were recruited to the study, 228 symptomatic cases and 258 asymptomatic controls. Women who used reusable absorbent pads were more likely to have symptoms of urogenital infection (AdjOR=2.3, 95%CI1.5-3.4) or to be diagnosed with at least one urogenital infection (BV or UTI) (AdjOR=2.8, 95%CI1.7-4.5), than women using disposable pads. Increased wealth and space for personal hygiene in the household were protective for BV (AdjOR=0.5, 95%CI0.3-0.9 and AdjOR=0.6, 95% CI0.3-0.9 respectively). Lower education of the participants was the only factor associated with UTI after adjusting for all the confounders (AdjOR=3.1, 95%CI1.2-7.9). Interventions that ensure women have access to private facilities with water for MHM and that educate women about safer, low-cost MHM materials could reduce urogenital disease among women. Further studies of the effects of specific practices for managing hygienically reusable pads and studies to explore other pathogenic reproductive tract infections are needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere0130777
JournalPloS one
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 30 2015

Fingerprint

Hygiene
hygiene
India
urinary tract diseases
Bacterial Vaginosis
Infection
infection
Practice Management
Urinary Tract Infections
Sanitation
Water
sanitation
socioeconomic status
Social Class
Absorbent Pads
Personal Space
Reproductive Tract Infections
absorbents
Water Resources
water

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • General

Cite this

Das, P., Baker, K. K., Dutta, A., Swain, T., Sahoo, S., Das, B. S., ... Torondel, B. (2015). Menstrual hygiene practices, WASH access and the risk of urogenital infection in women from Odisha, India. PloS one, 10(6), [e0130777]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130777

Menstrual hygiene practices, WASH access and the risk of urogenital infection in women from Odisha, India. / Das, Padma; Baker, Kelly K.; Dutta, Ambarish; Swain, Tapoja; Sahoo, Sunita; Das, Bhabani Sankar; Panda, Bijay; Nayak, Arati; Bara, Mary; Bilung, Bibiana; Mishra, Pravas Ranjan; Panigrahi, Pinaki; Cairncross, Sandy; Torondel, Belen.

In: PloS one, Vol. 10, No. 6, e0130777, 30.06.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Das, P, Baker, KK, Dutta, A, Swain, T, Sahoo, S, Das, BS, Panda, B, Nayak, A, Bara, M, Bilung, B, Mishra, PR, Panigrahi, P, Cairncross, S & Torondel, B 2015, 'Menstrual hygiene practices, WASH access and the risk of urogenital infection in women from Odisha, India', PloS one, vol. 10, no. 6, e0130777. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130777
Das, Padma ; Baker, Kelly K. ; Dutta, Ambarish ; Swain, Tapoja ; Sahoo, Sunita ; Das, Bhabani Sankar ; Panda, Bijay ; Nayak, Arati ; Bara, Mary ; Bilung, Bibiana ; Mishra, Pravas Ranjan ; Panigrahi, Pinaki ; Cairncross, Sandy ; Torondel, Belen. / Menstrual hygiene practices, WASH access and the risk of urogenital infection in women from Odisha, India. In: PloS one. 2015 ; Vol. 10, No. 6.
@article{6489dbd1f8cc4a1c9ed427b1d7028381,
title = "Menstrual hygiene practices, WASH access and the risk of urogenital infection in women from Odisha, India",
abstract = "Menstrual hygiene management (MHM) practices vary worldwide and depend on the individual's socioeconomic status, personal preferences, local traditions and beliefs, and access to water and sanitation resources. MHM practices can be particularly unhygienic and inconvenient for girls and women in poorer settings. Little is known about whether unhygienic MHM practices increase a woman's exposure to urogenital infections, such as bacterial vaginosis (BV) and urinary tract infection (UTI). This study aimed to determine the association of MHM practices with urogenital infections, controlling for environmental drivers. A hospital-based case-control study was conducted on 486 women at Odisha, India. Cases and controls were recruited using a syndromic approach. Vaginal swabs were collected from all the participants and tested for BV status using Amsel's criteria. Urine samples were cultured to assess UTI status. Socioeconomic status, clinical symptoms and reproductive history, and MHM and water and sanitation practices were obtained by standardised questionnaire. A total of 486 women were recruited to the study, 228 symptomatic cases and 258 asymptomatic controls. Women who used reusable absorbent pads were more likely to have symptoms of urogenital infection (AdjOR=2.3, 95{\%}CI1.5-3.4) or to be diagnosed with at least one urogenital infection (BV or UTI) (AdjOR=2.8, 95{\%}CI1.7-4.5), than women using disposable pads. Increased wealth and space for personal hygiene in the household were protective for BV (AdjOR=0.5, 95{\%}CI0.3-0.9 and AdjOR=0.6, 95{\%} CI0.3-0.9 respectively). Lower education of the participants was the only factor associated with UTI after adjusting for all the confounders (AdjOR=3.1, 95{\%}CI1.2-7.9). Interventions that ensure women have access to private facilities with water for MHM and that educate women about safer, low-cost MHM materials could reduce urogenital disease among women. Further studies of the effects of specific practices for managing hygienically reusable pads and studies to explore other pathogenic reproductive tract infections are needed.",
author = "Padma Das and Baker, {Kelly K.} and Ambarish Dutta and Tapoja Swain and Sunita Sahoo and Das, {Bhabani Sankar} and Bijay Panda and Arati Nayak and Mary Bara and Bibiana Bilung and Mishra, {Pravas Ranjan} and Pinaki Panigrahi and Sandy Cairncross and Belen Torondel",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0130777",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Menstrual hygiene practices, WASH access and the risk of urogenital infection in women from Odisha, India

AU - Das, Padma

AU - Baker, Kelly K.

AU - Dutta, Ambarish

AU - Swain, Tapoja

AU - Sahoo, Sunita

AU - Das, Bhabani Sankar

AU - Panda, Bijay

AU - Nayak, Arati

AU - Bara, Mary

AU - Bilung, Bibiana

AU - Mishra, Pravas Ranjan

AU - Panigrahi, Pinaki

AU - Cairncross, Sandy

AU - Torondel, Belen

PY - 2015/6/30

Y1 - 2015/6/30

N2 - Menstrual hygiene management (MHM) practices vary worldwide and depend on the individual's socioeconomic status, personal preferences, local traditions and beliefs, and access to water and sanitation resources. MHM practices can be particularly unhygienic and inconvenient for girls and women in poorer settings. Little is known about whether unhygienic MHM practices increase a woman's exposure to urogenital infections, such as bacterial vaginosis (BV) and urinary tract infection (UTI). This study aimed to determine the association of MHM practices with urogenital infections, controlling for environmental drivers. A hospital-based case-control study was conducted on 486 women at Odisha, India. Cases and controls were recruited using a syndromic approach. Vaginal swabs were collected from all the participants and tested for BV status using Amsel's criteria. Urine samples were cultured to assess UTI status. Socioeconomic status, clinical symptoms and reproductive history, and MHM and water and sanitation practices were obtained by standardised questionnaire. A total of 486 women were recruited to the study, 228 symptomatic cases and 258 asymptomatic controls. Women who used reusable absorbent pads were more likely to have symptoms of urogenital infection (AdjOR=2.3, 95%CI1.5-3.4) or to be diagnosed with at least one urogenital infection (BV or UTI) (AdjOR=2.8, 95%CI1.7-4.5), than women using disposable pads. Increased wealth and space for personal hygiene in the household were protective for BV (AdjOR=0.5, 95%CI0.3-0.9 and AdjOR=0.6, 95% CI0.3-0.9 respectively). Lower education of the participants was the only factor associated with UTI after adjusting for all the confounders (AdjOR=3.1, 95%CI1.2-7.9). Interventions that ensure women have access to private facilities with water for MHM and that educate women about safer, low-cost MHM materials could reduce urogenital disease among women. Further studies of the effects of specific practices for managing hygienically reusable pads and studies to explore other pathogenic reproductive tract infections are needed.

AB - Menstrual hygiene management (MHM) practices vary worldwide and depend on the individual's socioeconomic status, personal preferences, local traditions and beliefs, and access to water and sanitation resources. MHM practices can be particularly unhygienic and inconvenient for girls and women in poorer settings. Little is known about whether unhygienic MHM practices increase a woman's exposure to urogenital infections, such as bacterial vaginosis (BV) and urinary tract infection (UTI). This study aimed to determine the association of MHM practices with urogenital infections, controlling for environmental drivers. A hospital-based case-control study was conducted on 486 women at Odisha, India. Cases and controls were recruited using a syndromic approach. Vaginal swabs were collected from all the participants and tested for BV status using Amsel's criteria. Urine samples were cultured to assess UTI status. Socioeconomic status, clinical symptoms and reproductive history, and MHM and water and sanitation practices were obtained by standardised questionnaire. A total of 486 women were recruited to the study, 228 symptomatic cases and 258 asymptomatic controls. Women who used reusable absorbent pads were more likely to have symptoms of urogenital infection (AdjOR=2.3, 95%CI1.5-3.4) or to be diagnosed with at least one urogenital infection (BV or UTI) (AdjOR=2.8, 95%CI1.7-4.5), than women using disposable pads. Increased wealth and space for personal hygiene in the household were protective for BV (AdjOR=0.5, 95%CI0.3-0.9 and AdjOR=0.6, 95% CI0.3-0.9 respectively). Lower education of the participants was the only factor associated with UTI after adjusting for all the confounders (AdjOR=3.1, 95%CI1.2-7.9). Interventions that ensure women have access to private facilities with water for MHM and that educate women about safer, low-cost MHM materials could reduce urogenital disease among women. Further studies of the effects of specific practices for managing hygienically reusable pads and studies to explore other pathogenic reproductive tract infections are needed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938709271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938709271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0130777

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0130777

M3 - Article

C2 - 26125184

AN - SCOPUS:84938709271

VL - 10

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 6

M1 - e0130777

ER -