Memory impairment and source misattribution in postevent misinformation experiments with short retention intervals

Robert F. Belli, D. Stephen Lindsay, Maria S. Gales, Thomas T. McCarthy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

99 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The four experiments reported here provide evidence that (1) misleading postevent suggestions can impair memory for details in a witnessed event and (2) subjects sometimes remember sug-gested details as things seen in the event itself. All four experiments used recall tests in which subjects were warned of the possibility that the postevent information included misleading sug-gestions and were instructed to report both what they witnessed in the event and what was men-tioned in the postevent narrative. Recall of event details was poorer on misled items than on control items, and subjects sometimes misidentified the sources of their recollections. Our re-sults suggest that these findings are not due to guessing or response biases, but rather reflect genuine memory impairment and source monitoring confusions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)40-54
Number of pages15
JournalMemory & Cognition
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1994

Fingerprint

Communication
Retention (Psychology)
Impairment
Experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Memory impairment and source misattribution in postevent misinformation experiments with short retention intervals. / Belli, Robert F.; Lindsay, D. Stephen; Gales, Maria S.; McCarthy, Thomas T.

In: Memory & Cognition, Vol. 22, No. 1, 01.01.1994, p. 40-54.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Belli, Robert F. ; Lindsay, D. Stephen ; Gales, Maria S. ; McCarthy, Thomas T. / Memory impairment and source misattribution in postevent misinformation experiments with short retention intervals. In: Memory & Cognition. 1994 ; Vol. 22, No. 1. pp. 40-54.
@article{2cb1f079e7834cc8a2537b551c358c22,
title = "Memory impairment and source misattribution in postevent misinformation experiments with short retention intervals",
abstract = "The four experiments reported here provide evidence that (1) misleading postevent suggestions can impair memory for details in a witnessed event and (2) subjects sometimes remember sug-gested details as things seen in the event itself. All four experiments used recall tests in which subjects were warned of the possibility that the postevent information included misleading sug-gestions and were instructed to report both what they witnessed in the event and what was men-tioned in the postevent narrative. Recall of event details was poorer on misled items than on control items, and subjects sometimes misidentified the sources of their recollections. Our re-sults suggest that these findings are not due to guessing or response biases, but rather reflect genuine memory impairment and source monitoring confusions.",
author = "Belli, {Robert F.} and Lindsay, {D. Stephen} and Gales, {Maria S.} and McCarthy, {Thomas T.}",
year = "1994",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/BF03202760",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "40--54",
journal = "Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0090-502X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Memory impairment and source misattribution in postevent misinformation experiments with short retention intervals

AU - Belli, Robert F.

AU - Lindsay, D. Stephen

AU - Gales, Maria S.

AU - McCarthy, Thomas T.

PY - 1994/1/1

Y1 - 1994/1/1

N2 - The four experiments reported here provide evidence that (1) misleading postevent suggestions can impair memory for details in a witnessed event and (2) subjects sometimes remember sug-gested details as things seen in the event itself. All four experiments used recall tests in which subjects were warned of the possibility that the postevent information included misleading sug-gestions and were instructed to report both what they witnessed in the event and what was men-tioned in the postevent narrative. Recall of event details was poorer on misled items than on control items, and subjects sometimes misidentified the sources of their recollections. Our re-sults suggest that these findings are not due to guessing or response biases, but rather reflect genuine memory impairment and source monitoring confusions.

AB - The four experiments reported here provide evidence that (1) misleading postevent suggestions can impair memory for details in a witnessed event and (2) subjects sometimes remember sug-gested details as things seen in the event itself. All four experiments used recall tests in which subjects were warned of the possibility that the postevent information included misleading sug-gestions and were instructed to report both what they witnessed in the event and what was men-tioned in the postevent narrative. Recall of event details was poorer on misled items than on control items, and subjects sometimes misidentified the sources of their recollections. Our re-sults suggest that these findings are not due to guessing or response biases, but rather reflect genuine memory impairment and source monitoring confusions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028057963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028057963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03202760

DO - 10.3758/BF03202760

M3 - Article

C2 - 8035684

AN - SCOPUS:0028057963

VL - 22

SP - 40

EP - 54

JO - Memory and Cognition

JF - Memory and Cognition

SN - 0090-502X

IS - 1

ER -