Medical malpractice and facial nerve paralysis

Daniel D. Lydiatt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Iatrogenic facial nerve paralysis is a devastating surgical complication that occasionally results in litigation. Objective: To analyze litigation trends to better understand the causes and outcomes of suits involving facial nerve paralysis to prevent future litigation and improve physician education. Design: Retrospective review. Setting: All US civil trials. Participants: All state and federal civil trials alleging malpractice and facial nerve paralysis were reviewed. Methods: Jury verdict reviews from January 1, 1985, to December 31, 2000, were obtained from a computerized legal database and analyzed. Reviews compile data on defendants, plaintiffs, allegations of wrongdoing, and expert witness specialties, and provide case summaries. Fifty-three cases from 19 of the 50 states were obtained. Data were entered into a spreadsheet for analysis. Main Outcome Measures: Verdicts and indemnity payments. Results: Suits reviewed were as follows: cosmetic, 12 (23%); otologic, 13 (25%); nonneoplastic disease of the parotid or other benign conditions of the head and neck, 15 (28%); benign neoplasms of the parotid, 9 (17%); malignant neoplasms of the parotid, 1 (2%); and temporo-mandibular joint operations, 3 (6%) (percentages do not total 100 because of rounding). Allegations of negligence were frequently multiple and included lack of informed consent (16 [30%] of 53), failure to diagnose (10 [19%] of 53), and surgical misadventures (47 [89%] of 53). Excluding failure to obtain consent or to diagnose, 28 suits still alleged negligence based solely on a surgical misadventure. Of these suits, 12 (63%) resulted in plaintiff awards. Conclusions: Surgeons must emphasize and document the likelihood and consequences of this devastating complication to all patients undergoing surgery in this area. Risk management goals include a thorough and timely examination and careful and thoughtful surgical approaches. However, patient rapport and bedside manner may be the only protection the surgeon has from litigation arising from this complication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)50-53
Number of pages4
JournalArchives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume129
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

Facial Paralysis
Malpractice
Facial Nerve
Jurisprudence
Parotid Diseases
Parotid Neoplasms
Risk Management
Expert Testimony
Insurance
Informed Consent
Cosmetics
Neck
Head
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases
Physicians
Education
Neoplasms
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Medical malpractice and facial nerve paralysis. / Lydiatt, Daniel D.

In: Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 129, No. 1, 01.01.2003, p. 50-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{812684162704428a9569ab0cda760f1b,
title = "Medical malpractice and facial nerve paralysis",
abstract = "Background: Iatrogenic facial nerve paralysis is a devastating surgical complication that occasionally results in litigation. Objective: To analyze litigation trends to better understand the causes and outcomes of suits involving facial nerve paralysis to prevent future litigation and improve physician education. Design: Retrospective review. Setting: All US civil trials. Participants: All state and federal civil trials alleging malpractice and facial nerve paralysis were reviewed. Methods: Jury verdict reviews from January 1, 1985, to December 31, 2000, were obtained from a computerized legal database and analyzed. Reviews compile data on defendants, plaintiffs, allegations of wrongdoing, and expert witness specialties, and provide case summaries. Fifty-three cases from 19 of the 50 states were obtained. Data were entered into a spreadsheet for analysis. Main Outcome Measures: Verdicts and indemnity payments. Results: Suits reviewed were as follows: cosmetic, 12 (23{\%}); otologic, 13 (25{\%}); nonneoplastic disease of the parotid or other benign conditions of the head and neck, 15 (28{\%}); benign neoplasms of the parotid, 9 (17{\%}); malignant neoplasms of the parotid, 1 (2{\%}); and temporo-mandibular joint operations, 3 (6{\%}) (percentages do not total 100 because of rounding). Allegations of negligence were frequently multiple and included lack of informed consent (16 [30{\%}] of 53), failure to diagnose (10 [19{\%}] of 53), and surgical misadventures (47 [89{\%}] of 53). Excluding failure to obtain consent or to diagnose, 28 suits still alleged negligence based solely on a surgical misadventure. Of these suits, 12 (63{\%}) resulted in plaintiff awards. Conclusions: Surgeons must emphasize and document the likelihood and consequences of this devastating complication to all patients undergoing surgery in this area. Risk management goals include a thorough and timely examination and careful and thoughtful surgical approaches. However, patient rapport and bedside manner may be the only protection the surgeon has from litigation arising from this complication.",
author = "Lydiatt, {Daniel D.}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/archotol.129.1.50",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "129",
pages = "50--53",
journal = "JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery",
issn = "2168-6181",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medical malpractice and facial nerve paralysis

AU - Lydiatt, Daniel D.

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - Background: Iatrogenic facial nerve paralysis is a devastating surgical complication that occasionally results in litigation. Objective: To analyze litigation trends to better understand the causes and outcomes of suits involving facial nerve paralysis to prevent future litigation and improve physician education. Design: Retrospective review. Setting: All US civil trials. Participants: All state and federal civil trials alleging malpractice and facial nerve paralysis were reviewed. Methods: Jury verdict reviews from January 1, 1985, to December 31, 2000, were obtained from a computerized legal database and analyzed. Reviews compile data on defendants, plaintiffs, allegations of wrongdoing, and expert witness specialties, and provide case summaries. Fifty-three cases from 19 of the 50 states were obtained. Data were entered into a spreadsheet for analysis. Main Outcome Measures: Verdicts and indemnity payments. Results: Suits reviewed were as follows: cosmetic, 12 (23%); otologic, 13 (25%); nonneoplastic disease of the parotid or other benign conditions of the head and neck, 15 (28%); benign neoplasms of the parotid, 9 (17%); malignant neoplasms of the parotid, 1 (2%); and temporo-mandibular joint operations, 3 (6%) (percentages do not total 100 because of rounding). Allegations of negligence were frequently multiple and included lack of informed consent (16 [30%] of 53), failure to diagnose (10 [19%] of 53), and surgical misadventures (47 [89%] of 53). Excluding failure to obtain consent or to diagnose, 28 suits still alleged negligence based solely on a surgical misadventure. Of these suits, 12 (63%) resulted in plaintiff awards. Conclusions: Surgeons must emphasize and document the likelihood and consequences of this devastating complication to all patients undergoing surgery in this area. Risk management goals include a thorough and timely examination and careful and thoughtful surgical approaches. However, patient rapport and bedside manner may be the only protection the surgeon has from litigation arising from this complication.

AB - Background: Iatrogenic facial nerve paralysis is a devastating surgical complication that occasionally results in litigation. Objective: To analyze litigation trends to better understand the causes and outcomes of suits involving facial nerve paralysis to prevent future litigation and improve physician education. Design: Retrospective review. Setting: All US civil trials. Participants: All state and federal civil trials alleging malpractice and facial nerve paralysis were reviewed. Methods: Jury verdict reviews from January 1, 1985, to December 31, 2000, were obtained from a computerized legal database and analyzed. Reviews compile data on defendants, plaintiffs, allegations of wrongdoing, and expert witness specialties, and provide case summaries. Fifty-three cases from 19 of the 50 states were obtained. Data were entered into a spreadsheet for analysis. Main Outcome Measures: Verdicts and indemnity payments. Results: Suits reviewed were as follows: cosmetic, 12 (23%); otologic, 13 (25%); nonneoplastic disease of the parotid or other benign conditions of the head and neck, 15 (28%); benign neoplasms of the parotid, 9 (17%); malignant neoplasms of the parotid, 1 (2%); and temporo-mandibular joint operations, 3 (6%) (percentages do not total 100 because of rounding). Allegations of negligence were frequently multiple and included lack of informed consent (16 [30%] of 53), failure to diagnose (10 [19%] of 53), and surgical misadventures (47 [89%] of 53). Excluding failure to obtain consent or to diagnose, 28 suits still alleged negligence based solely on a surgical misadventure. Of these suits, 12 (63%) resulted in plaintiff awards. Conclusions: Surgeons must emphasize and document the likelihood and consequences of this devastating complication to all patients undergoing surgery in this area. Risk management goals include a thorough and timely examination and careful and thoughtful surgical approaches. However, patient rapport and bedside manner may be the only protection the surgeon has from litigation arising from this complication.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037224901&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037224901&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archotol.129.1.50

DO - 10.1001/archotol.129.1.50

M3 - Article

C2 - 12525194

AN - SCOPUS:0037224901

VL - 129

SP - 50

EP - 53

JO - JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

JF - JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

SN - 2168-6181

IS - 1

ER -