Mechanomyography and muscle function assessment: A review of current state and prospects

Morufu Olusola Ibitoye, Nur Azah Hamzaid, Jorge M. Zuniga, Ahmad Khairi Abdul Wahab

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous studies have explored to saturation the efficacy of the conventional signal (such as electromyogram) for muscle function assessment and found its clinical impact limited. Increasing demand for reliable muscle function assessment modalities continues to prompt further investigation into other complementary alternatives. Application of mechanomyographic signal to quantify muscle performance has been proposed due to its inherent mechanical nature and ability to assess muscle function non-invasively while preserving muscular neurophysiologic information. Mechanomyogram is gaining accelerated applications in evaluating the properties of muscle under voluntary and evoked muscle contraction with prospects in clinical practices. As a complementary modality and the mechanical counterpart to electromyogram; mechanomyogram has gained significant acceptance in analysis of isometric and dynamic muscle actions. Substantial studies have also documented the effectiveness of mechanomyographic signal to assess muscle performance but none involved comprehensive appraisal of the state of the art applications with highlights on the future prospect and potential integration into the clinical practices. Motivated by the dearth of such critical review, we assessed the literature to investigate its principle of acquisition, current applications, challenges and future directions. Based on our findings, the importance of rigorous scientific and clinical validation of the signal is highlighted. It is also evident that as a robust complement to electromyogram, mechanomyographic signal may possess unprecedented potentials and further investigation will be enlightening.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)691-704
Number of pages14
JournalClinical Biomechanics
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2014

Fingerprint

Muscles
Electromyography
Muscle Contraction
Skeletal Muscle

Keywords

  • Electromyogram
  • Mechanomyogram
  • Muscle function assessment
  • Voluntary and evoked muscle contraction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Mechanomyography and muscle function assessment : A review of current state and prospects. / Ibitoye, Morufu Olusola; Hamzaid, Nur Azah; Zuniga, Jorge M.; Abdul Wahab, Ahmad Khairi.

In: Clinical Biomechanics, Vol. 29, No. 6, 06.2014, p. 691-704.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Ibitoye, Morufu Olusola ; Hamzaid, Nur Azah ; Zuniga, Jorge M. ; Abdul Wahab, Ahmad Khairi. / Mechanomyography and muscle function assessment : A review of current state and prospects. In: Clinical Biomechanics. 2014 ; Vol. 29, No. 6. pp. 691-704.
@article{aa1fa608ba5e4120bfa8607f0f74e82f,
title = "Mechanomyography and muscle function assessment: A review of current state and prospects",
abstract = "Previous studies have explored to saturation the efficacy of the conventional signal (such as electromyogram) for muscle function assessment and found its clinical impact limited. Increasing demand for reliable muscle function assessment modalities continues to prompt further investigation into other complementary alternatives. Application of mechanomyographic signal to quantify muscle performance has been proposed due to its inherent mechanical nature and ability to assess muscle function non-invasively while preserving muscular neurophysiologic information. Mechanomyogram is gaining accelerated applications in evaluating the properties of muscle under voluntary and evoked muscle contraction with prospects in clinical practices. As a complementary modality and the mechanical counterpart to electromyogram; mechanomyogram has gained significant acceptance in analysis of isometric and dynamic muscle actions. Substantial studies have also documented the effectiveness of mechanomyographic signal to assess muscle performance but none involved comprehensive appraisal of the state of the art applications with highlights on the future prospect and potential integration into the clinical practices. Motivated by the dearth of such critical review, we assessed the literature to investigate its principle of acquisition, current applications, challenges and future directions. Based on our findings, the importance of rigorous scientific and clinical validation of the signal is highlighted. It is also evident that as a robust complement to electromyogram, mechanomyographic signal may possess unprecedented potentials and further investigation will be enlightening.",
keywords = "Electromyogram, Mechanomyogram, Muscle function assessment, Voluntary and evoked muscle contraction",
author = "Ibitoye, {Morufu Olusola} and Hamzaid, {Nur Azah} and Zuniga, {Jorge M.} and {Abdul Wahab}, {Ahmad Khairi}",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.04.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "691--704",
journal = "Clinical Biomechanics",
issn = "0268-0033",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mechanomyography and muscle function assessment

T2 - A review of current state and prospects

AU - Ibitoye, Morufu Olusola

AU - Hamzaid, Nur Azah

AU - Zuniga, Jorge M.

AU - Abdul Wahab, Ahmad Khairi

PY - 2014/6

Y1 - 2014/6

N2 - Previous studies have explored to saturation the efficacy of the conventional signal (such as electromyogram) for muscle function assessment and found its clinical impact limited. Increasing demand for reliable muscle function assessment modalities continues to prompt further investigation into other complementary alternatives. Application of mechanomyographic signal to quantify muscle performance has been proposed due to its inherent mechanical nature and ability to assess muscle function non-invasively while preserving muscular neurophysiologic information. Mechanomyogram is gaining accelerated applications in evaluating the properties of muscle under voluntary and evoked muscle contraction with prospects in clinical practices. As a complementary modality and the mechanical counterpart to electromyogram; mechanomyogram has gained significant acceptance in analysis of isometric and dynamic muscle actions. Substantial studies have also documented the effectiveness of mechanomyographic signal to assess muscle performance but none involved comprehensive appraisal of the state of the art applications with highlights on the future prospect and potential integration into the clinical practices. Motivated by the dearth of such critical review, we assessed the literature to investigate its principle of acquisition, current applications, challenges and future directions. Based on our findings, the importance of rigorous scientific and clinical validation of the signal is highlighted. It is also evident that as a robust complement to electromyogram, mechanomyographic signal may possess unprecedented potentials and further investigation will be enlightening.

AB - Previous studies have explored to saturation the efficacy of the conventional signal (such as electromyogram) for muscle function assessment and found its clinical impact limited. Increasing demand for reliable muscle function assessment modalities continues to prompt further investigation into other complementary alternatives. Application of mechanomyographic signal to quantify muscle performance has been proposed due to its inherent mechanical nature and ability to assess muscle function non-invasively while preserving muscular neurophysiologic information. Mechanomyogram is gaining accelerated applications in evaluating the properties of muscle under voluntary and evoked muscle contraction with prospects in clinical practices. As a complementary modality and the mechanical counterpart to electromyogram; mechanomyogram has gained significant acceptance in analysis of isometric and dynamic muscle actions. Substantial studies have also documented the effectiveness of mechanomyographic signal to assess muscle performance but none involved comprehensive appraisal of the state of the art applications with highlights on the future prospect and potential integration into the clinical practices. Motivated by the dearth of such critical review, we assessed the literature to investigate its principle of acquisition, current applications, challenges and future directions. Based on our findings, the importance of rigorous scientific and clinical validation of the signal is highlighted. It is also evident that as a robust complement to electromyogram, mechanomyographic signal may possess unprecedented potentials and further investigation will be enlightening.

KW - Electromyogram

KW - Mechanomyogram

KW - Muscle function assessment

KW - Voluntary and evoked muscle contraction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905088929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905088929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.04.003

DO - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.04.003

M3 - Review article

C2 - 24856875

AN - SCOPUS:84905088929

VL - 29

SP - 691

EP - 704

JO - Clinical Biomechanics

JF - Clinical Biomechanics

SN - 0268-0033

IS - 6

ER -