Mechanomyographic and electromyographic responses during submaximal cycle ergometry

T. J. Housh, S. R. Perry, A. J. Bull, G. O. Johnson, K. T. Ebersole, D. J. Housh, H. A. de Vries

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the mechanomyographic (MMG) and electromyographic (EMG) responses during continuous, cycle ergometer workbouts performed at constant power outputs. Eight adults [mean (SD) age, 21.5 (1.6) years] volunteered to perform an incremental test to exhaustion for the determination of peak power (Ẇpeak) and four, 15-min (or to exhaustion) rides at constant power outputs of 50%, 65%, 80%, and 95% Ẇpeak. Piezoelectric crystal contact sensors were placed on the vastus lateralis (VL) and vastus medialis (VM) muscles to record the MMG signals. Bipolar surface electrode arrangements were placed on the VL and VM to record the EMG signals. Five-second samples of the MMG and EMG signals were recorded every 30 s at power outputs of 50%, 65%, and 80% Ẇpeak, and every 15 s at 95% Ẇpeak. The amplitudes of the selected portions of the signals were normalized to the first values recorded during the continuous rides, and regression analyses were used to determine whether the slope coefficients for the MMG and EMG versus time relationships were significantly (P < 0.05) different from zero. The results indicate that EMG amplitude increased (range of slope coefficients: 0.03-0.56) during the continuous rides for both muscles at all four power outputs (except the VM at 50% Ẇpeak), while MMG amplitude increased (slope coefficient at 95% Ẇpeak for VM = 0.19), decreased (range of slope coefficients for VL and VM at 50% and 65% Ẇpeak = -0.14 to -0.24), or remained unchanged (range of slope coefficients for VL and VM at 80% Wpeak and VL at 95% Ẇpeak = -0.06 to 0.12) depending on the power output. The patterns of the MMG responses, however, were similar for the VL and VM muscles, except at 95% Ẇpeak. Fatigue-induced changes in motor-unit recruitment and discharge rates, or muscular compliance may explain the differences between power outputs in the patterns of the MMG amplitude responses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)381-387
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology
Volume83
Issue number4-5
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2000

Fingerprint

Ergometry
Quadriceps Muscle
Muscles
Neurophysiological Recruitment
Compliance
Fatigue

Keywords

  • Electromyogram
  • Fatigue
  • Mechanomyogram
  • Muscle wisdom
  • Muscular compliance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Housh, T. J., Perry, S. R., Bull, A. J., Johnson, G. O., Ebersole, K. T., Housh, D. J., & de Vries, H. A. (2000). Mechanomyographic and electromyographic responses during submaximal cycle ergometry. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 83(4-5), 381-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004210000315

Mechanomyographic and electromyographic responses during submaximal cycle ergometry. / Housh, T. J.; Perry, S. R.; Bull, A. J.; Johnson, G. O.; Ebersole, K. T.; Housh, D. J.; de Vries, H. A.

In: European Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 83, No. 4-5, 01.12.2000, p. 381-387.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Housh, TJ, Perry, SR, Bull, AJ, Johnson, GO, Ebersole, KT, Housh, DJ & de Vries, HA 2000, 'Mechanomyographic and electromyographic responses during submaximal cycle ergometry', European Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 83, no. 4-5, pp. 381-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004210000315
Housh, T. J. ; Perry, S. R. ; Bull, A. J. ; Johnson, G. O. ; Ebersole, K. T. ; Housh, D. J. ; de Vries, H. A. / Mechanomyographic and electromyographic responses during submaximal cycle ergometry. In: European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2000 ; Vol. 83, No. 4-5. pp. 381-387.
@article{1eeacb241d07408b9c598b88a7fa9dde,
title = "Mechanomyographic and electromyographic responses during submaximal cycle ergometry",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to examine the mechanomyographic (MMG) and electromyographic (EMG) responses during continuous, cycle ergometer workbouts performed at constant power outputs. Eight adults [mean (SD) age, 21.5 (1.6) years] volunteered to perform an incremental test to exhaustion for the determination of peak power (Ẇpeak) and four, 15-min (or to exhaustion) rides at constant power outputs of 50{\%}, 65{\%}, 80{\%}, and 95{\%} Ẇpeak. Piezoelectric crystal contact sensors were placed on the vastus lateralis (VL) and vastus medialis (VM) muscles to record the MMG signals. Bipolar surface electrode arrangements were placed on the VL and VM to record the EMG signals. Five-second samples of the MMG and EMG signals were recorded every 30 s at power outputs of 50{\%}, 65{\%}, and 80{\%} Ẇpeak, and every 15 s at 95{\%} Ẇpeak. The amplitudes of the selected portions of the signals were normalized to the first values recorded during the continuous rides, and regression analyses were used to determine whether the slope coefficients for the MMG and EMG versus time relationships were significantly (P < 0.05) different from zero. The results indicate that EMG amplitude increased (range of slope coefficients: 0.03-0.56) during the continuous rides for both muscles at all four power outputs (except the VM at 50{\%} Ẇpeak), while MMG amplitude increased (slope coefficient at 95{\%} Ẇpeak for VM = 0.19), decreased (range of slope coefficients for VL and VM at 50{\%} and 65{\%} Ẇpeak = -0.14 to -0.24), or remained unchanged (range of slope coefficients for VL and VM at 80{\%} Wpeak and VL at 95{\%} Ẇpeak = -0.06 to 0.12) depending on the power output. The patterns of the MMG responses, however, were similar for the VL and VM muscles, except at 95{\%} Ẇpeak. Fatigue-induced changes in motor-unit recruitment and discharge rates, or muscular compliance may explain the differences between power outputs in the patterns of the MMG amplitude responses.",
keywords = "Electromyogram, Fatigue, Mechanomyogram, Muscle wisdom, Muscular compliance",
author = "Housh, {T. J.} and Perry, {S. R.} and Bull, {A. J.} and Johnson, {G. O.} and Ebersole, {K. T.} and Housh, {D. J.} and {de Vries}, {H. A.}",
year = "2000",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s004210000315",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "381--387",
journal = "European Journal of Applied Physiology",
issn = "1439-6319",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "4-5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mechanomyographic and electromyographic responses during submaximal cycle ergometry

AU - Housh, T. J.

AU - Perry, S. R.

AU - Bull, A. J.

AU - Johnson, G. O.

AU - Ebersole, K. T.

AU - Housh, D. J.

AU - de Vries, H. A.

PY - 2000/12/1

Y1 - 2000/12/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to examine the mechanomyographic (MMG) and electromyographic (EMG) responses during continuous, cycle ergometer workbouts performed at constant power outputs. Eight adults [mean (SD) age, 21.5 (1.6) years] volunteered to perform an incremental test to exhaustion for the determination of peak power (Ẇpeak) and four, 15-min (or to exhaustion) rides at constant power outputs of 50%, 65%, 80%, and 95% Ẇpeak. Piezoelectric crystal contact sensors were placed on the vastus lateralis (VL) and vastus medialis (VM) muscles to record the MMG signals. Bipolar surface electrode arrangements were placed on the VL and VM to record the EMG signals. Five-second samples of the MMG and EMG signals were recorded every 30 s at power outputs of 50%, 65%, and 80% Ẇpeak, and every 15 s at 95% Ẇpeak. The amplitudes of the selected portions of the signals were normalized to the first values recorded during the continuous rides, and regression analyses were used to determine whether the slope coefficients for the MMG and EMG versus time relationships were significantly (P < 0.05) different from zero. The results indicate that EMG amplitude increased (range of slope coefficients: 0.03-0.56) during the continuous rides for both muscles at all four power outputs (except the VM at 50% Ẇpeak), while MMG amplitude increased (slope coefficient at 95% Ẇpeak for VM = 0.19), decreased (range of slope coefficients for VL and VM at 50% and 65% Ẇpeak = -0.14 to -0.24), or remained unchanged (range of slope coefficients for VL and VM at 80% Wpeak and VL at 95% Ẇpeak = -0.06 to 0.12) depending on the power output. The patterns of the MMG responses, however, were similar for the VL and VM muscles, except at 95% Ẇpeak. Fatigue-induced changes in motor-unit recruitment and discharge rates, or muscular compliance may explain the differences between power outputs in the patterns of the MMG amplitude responses.

AB - The purpose of this study was to examine the mechanomyographic (MMG) and electromyographic (EMG) responses during continuous, cycle ergometer workbouts performed at constant power outputs. Eight adults [mean (SD) age, 21.5 (1.6) years] volunteered to perform an incremental test to exhaustion for the determination of peak power (Ẇpeak) and four, 15-min (or to exhaustion) rides at constant power outputs of 50%, 65%, 80%, and 95% Ẇpeak. Piezoelectric crystal contact sensors were placed on the vastus lateralis (VL) and vastus medialis (VM) muscles to record the MMG signals. Bipolar surface electrode arrangements were placed on the VL and VM to record the EMG signals. Five-second samples of the MMG and EMG signals were recorded every 30 s at power outputs of 50%, 65%, and 80% Ẇpeak, and every 15 s at 95% Ẇpeak. The amplitudes of the selected portions of the signals were normalized to the first values recorded during the continuous rides, and regression analyses were used to determine whether the slope coefficients for the MMG and EMG versus time relationships were significantly (P < 0.05) different from zero. The results indicate that EMG amplitude increased (range of slope coefficients: 0.03-0.56) during the continuous rides for both muscles at all four power outputs (except the VM at 50% Ẇpeak), while MMG amplitude increased (slope coefficient at 95% Ẇpeak for VM = 0.19), decreased (range of slope coefficients for VL and VM at 50% and 65% Ẇpeak = -0.14 to -0.24), or remained unchanged (range of slope coefficients for VL and VM at 80% Wpeak and VL at 95% Ẇpeak = -0.06 to 0.12) depending on the power output. The patterns of the MMG responses, however, were similar for the VL and VM muscles, except at 95% Ẇpeak. Fatigue-induced changes in motor-unit recruitment and discharge rates, or muscular compliance may explain the differences between power outputs in the patterns of the MMG amplitude responses.

KW - Electromyogram

KW - Fatigue

KW - Mechanomyogram

KW - Muscle wisdom

KW - Muscular compliance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034532672&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034532672&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s004210000315

DO - 10.1007/s004210000315

M3 - Article

C2 - 11138579

AN - SCOPUS:0034532672

VL - 83

SP - 381

EP - 387

JO - European Journal of Applied Physiology

JF - European Journal of Applied Physiology

SN - 1439-6319

IS - 4-5

ER -