Mechanical evaluation of large-size fourth-generation composite femur and tibia models

Matthew P. Gardner, Alexander C.M. Chong, Anthony G. Pollock, Paul H. Wooley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

104 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Composite analogue bone models provide consistent geometric and structural properties that represent a valuable asset in a range of biomechanical analyses and testing procedures. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diaphyseal structural properties of the large-size Fourth-Generation composite analogue femur and tibia models concentrated on mechanical behaviors under axial compression, bending and torsion. Thirty of each large-size composite analogue models (femora and tibiae) were tested under medial-lateral four-point bending, anterior-posterior four-point bending, axial compression and external rotational torque to evaluate flexural rigidity, axial stiffness, torsional rigidity and ultimate failure strength. The composite femur was tested under torsion at both the femoral neck and the mid-diaphyseal areas. Large-size Fourth-Generation composite replicate bones exhibited intra-specimen variations under 10% for all cases and was also found to perform within the biological range of healthy adult bones (age: <80 years old) range with respect to flexural rigidity (<8%) and torsional rigidity (<12%). The failure modes of these composite models were close to published findings for human bones (four-point bending: butterfly fragment fracture; torsional: spiral fracture; and compression: transverse fracture). The large-size composite analogue femur and tibia are close to ideal replicas for standardization in biomechanical analyses. One advantage of these analogue models is that their variability is significantly lower than that of cadaveric specimens for all loading regimens. Published results vary widely in cadaveric studies, which is likely due to the high anatomic variability among cadaveric specimens. This study evaluated and advanced our overall understanding of the capacity of composite analogue bone models mimic the structural properties of average healthy adult human bones.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)613-620
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of biomedical engineering
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2010

Fingerprint

Bone
Composite materials
Rigidity
Structural properties
Axial compression
Torsional stress
Bending (deformation)
Standardization
Failure modes
Compaction
Torque
Stiffness
Testing

Keywords

  • Biomechanical model
  • Bone mechanics
  • Bone stiffness
  • Composite analogue femur
  • Composite analogue tibia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

Mechanical evaluation of large-size fourth-generation composite femur and tibia models. / Gardner, Matthew P.; Chong, Alexander C.M.; Pollock, Anthony G.; Wooley, Paul H.

In: Annals of biomedical engineering, Vol. 38, No. 3, 01.03.2010, p. 613-620.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gardner, Matthew P. ; Chong, Alexander C.M. ; Pollock, Anthony G. ; Wooley, Paul H. / Mechanical evaluation of large-size fourth-generation composite femur and tibia models. In: Annals of biomedical engineering. 2010 ; Vol. 38, No. 3. pp. 613-620.
@article{4b9ef2e32c3a44a49e5ab2e278756c1b,
title = "Mechanical evaluation of large-size fourth-generation composite femur and tibia models",
abstract = "Composite analogue bone models provide consistent geometric and structural properties that represent a valuable asset in a range of biomechanical analyses and testing procedures. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diaphyseal structural properties of the large-size Fourth-Generation composite analogue femur and tibia models concentrated on mechanical behaviors under axial compression, bending and torsion. Thirty of each large-size composite analogue models (femora and tibiae) were tested under medial-lateral four-point bending, anterior-posterior four-point bending, axial compression and external rotational torque to evaluate flexural rigidity, axial stiffness, torsional rigidity and ultimate failure strength. The composite femur was tested under torsion at both the femoral neck and the mid-diaphyseal areas. Large-size Fourth-Generation composite replicate bones exhibited intra-specimen variations under 10{\%} for all cases and was also found to perform within the biological range of healthy adult bones (age: <80 years old) range with respect to flexural rigidity (<8{\%}) and torsional rigidity (<12{\%}). The failure modes of these composite models were close to published findings for human bones (four-point bending: butterfly fragment fracture; torsional: spiral fracture; and compression: transverse fracture). The large-size composite analogue femur and tibia are close to ideal replicas for standardization in biomechanical analyses. One advantage of these analogue models is that their variability is significantly lower than that of cadaveric specimens for all loading regimens. Published results vary widely in cadaveric studies, which is likely due to the high anatomic variability among cadaveric specimens. This study evaluated and advanced our overall understanding of the capacity of composite analogue bone models mimic the structural properties of average healthy adult human bones.",
keywords = "Biomechanical model, Bone mechanics, Bone stiffness, Composite analogue femur, Composite analogue tibia",
author = "Gardner, {Matthew P.} and Chong, {Alexander C.M.} and Pollock, {Anthony G.} and Wooley, {Paul H.}",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10439-009-9887-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "613--620",
journal = "Annals of Biomedical Engineering",
issn = "0090-6964",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mechanical evaluation of large-size fourth-generation composite femur and tibia models

AU - Gardner, Matthew P.

AU - Chong, Alexander C.M.

AU - Pollock, Anthony G.

AU - Wooley, Paul H.

PY - 2010/3/1

Y1 - 2010/3/1

N2 - Composite analogue bone models provide consistent geometric and structural properties that represent a valuable asset in a range of biomechanical analyses and testing procedures. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diaphyseal structural properties of the large-size Fourth-Generation composite analogue femur and tibia models concentrated on mechanical behaviors under axial compression, bending and torsion. Thirty of each large-size composite analogue models (femora and tibiae) were tested under medial-lateral four-point bending, anterior-posterior four-point bending, axial compression and external rotational torque to evaluate flexural rigidity, axial stiffness, torsional rigidity and ultimate failure strength. The composite femur was tested under torsion at both the femoral neck and the mid-diaphyseal areas. Large-size Fourth-Generation composite replicate bones exhibited intra-specimen variations under 10% for all cases and was also found to perform within the biological range of healthy adult bones (age: <80 years old) range with respect to flexural rigidity (<8%) and torsional rigidity (<12%). The failure modes of these composite models were close to published findings for human bones (four-point bending: butterfly fragment fracture; torsional: spiral fracture; and compression: transverse fracture). The large-size composite analogue femur and tibia are close to ideal replicas for standardization in biomechanical analyses. One advantage of these analogue models is that their variability is significantly lower than that of cadaveric specimens for all loading regimens. Published results vary widely in cadaveric studies, which is likely due to the high anatomic variability among cadaveric specimens. This study evaluated and advanced our overall understanding of the capacity of composite analogue bone models mimic the structural properties of average healthy adult human bones.

AB - Composite analogue bone models provide consistent geometric and structural properties that represent a valuable asset in a range of biomechanical analyses and testing procedures. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diaphyseal structural properties of the large-size Fourth-Generation composite analogue femur and tibia models concentrated on mechanical behaviors under axial compression, bending and torsion. Thirty of each large-size composite analogue models (femora and tibiae) were tested under medial-lateral four-point bending, anterior-posterior four-point bending, axial compression and external rotational torque to evaluate flexural rigidity, axial stiffness, torsional rigidity and ultimate failure strength. The composite femur was tested under torsion at both the femoral neck and the mid-diaphyseal areas. Large-size Fourth-Generation composite replicate bones exhibited intra-specimen variations under 10% for all cases and was also found to perform within the biological range of healthy adult bones (age: <80 years old) range with respect to flexural rigidity (<8%) and torsional rigidity (<12%). The failure modes of these composite models were close to published findings for human bones (four-point bending: butterfly fragment fracture; torsional: spiral fracture; and compression: transverse fracture). The large-size composite analogue femur and tibia are close to ideal replicas for standardization in biomechanical analyses. One advantage of these analogue models is that their variability is significantly lower than that of cadaveric specimens for all loading regimens. Published results vary widely in cadaveric studies, which is likely due to the high anatomic variability among cadaveric specimens. This study evaluated and advanced our overall understanding of the capacity of composite analogue bone models mimic the structural properties of average healthy adult human bones.

KW - Biomechanical model

KW - Bone mechanics

KW - Bone stiffness

KW - Composite analogue femur

KW - Composite analogue tibia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952012233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952012233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10439-009-9887-7

DO - 10.1007/s10439-009-9887-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 20049637

AN - SCOPUS:77952012233

VL - 38

SP - 613

EP - 620

JO - Annals of Biomedical Engineering

JF - Annals of Biomedical Engineering

SN - 0090-6964

IS - 3

ER -