Mechanical characterization of braided self-expanding stents: Impact of design parameters

Qingli Zheng, Hozhabr Mozafari, Zhiqiang Li, Linxia Gu, Meiwen An, Xinwei Han, Zhong You

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this paper, the mechanical performance of braided nitinol stents was systematically studied to provide guidelines for optimum stent designs. The influences of braiding patterns, braiding angles, wire diameters, and strand numbers on the mechanical behavior of the stent in terms of crimping strain, radial strength, longitudinal flexibility, and stability were characterized utilizing finite element method. Our results have shown that the two key design factors of braided stents are the braiding angle and wire diameter. A smaller braiding angle can increase radial stiffness and have better longitudinal flexibility and can maintain the stent stability. The wire diameter has less influence on the radial stiffness than the braiding angle, but the longitudinal flexibility is most sensitive to the wire diameter. The strand number is directly proportional to the radial stiffness and inversely proportional to the longitudinal flexibility. Compared to the classical crossing pattern, we have also proposed two patterns. These patterns have a minimal impact on the crimping and radial stiffness of stents, but the stent made from them are more flexible. Among three crossing patterns, it is interesting to see that the classical pattern is the most stable crossing pattern for stand numbers larger than 36, but it became the most unstable pattern at the strand number of 24. This work has shed light on the optimum design of braided stents.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1950038
JournalJournal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology
Volume19
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2019

Fingerprint

Stents
Stiffness
Wire
Convergence of numerical methods
Finite element method

Keywords

  • Nitinol braided stents
  • crimping
  • design parameters
  • finite element analysis
  • flexibility
  • radial strength

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

Mechanical characterization of braided self-expanding stents : Impact of design parameters. / Zheng, Qingli; Mozafari, Hozhabr; Li, Zhiqiang; Gu, Linxia; An, Meiwen; Han, Xinwei; You, Zhong.

In: Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 19, No. 6, 1950038, 01.09.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zheng, Qingli ; Mozafari, Hozhabr ; Li, Zhiqiang ; Gu, Linxia ; An, Meiwen ; Han, Xinwei ; You, Zhong. / Mechanical characterization of braided self-expanding stents : Impact of design parameters. In: Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology. 2019 ; Vol. 19, No. 6.
@article{e895255a227d47a1bbc2282824276a85,
title = "Mechanical characterization of braided self-expanding stents: Impact of design parameters",
abstract = "In this paper, the mechanical performance of braided nitinol stents was systematically studied to provide guidelines for optimum stent designs. The influences of braiding patterns, braiding angles, wire diameters, and strand numbers on the mechanical behavior of the stent in terms of crimping strain, radial strength, longitudinal flexibility, and stability were characterized utilizing finite element method. Our results have shown that the two key design factors of braided stents are the braiding angle and wire diameter. A smaller braiding angle can increase radial stiffness and have better longitudinal flexibility and can maintain the stent stability. The wire diameter has less influence on the radial stiffness than the braiding angle, but the longitudinal flexibility is most sensitive to the wire diameter. The strand number is directly proportional to the radial stiffness and inversely proportional to the longitudinal flexibility. Compared to the classical crossing pattern, we have also proposed two patterns. These patterns have a minimal impact on the crimping and radial stiffness of stents, but the stent made from them are more flexible. Among three crossing patterns, it is interesting to see that the classical pattern is the most stable crossing pattern for stand numbers larger than 36, but it became the most unstable pattern at the strand number of 24. This work has shed light on the optimum design of braided stents.",
keywords = "Nitinol braided stents, crimping, design parameters, finite element analysis, flexibility, radial strength",
author = "Qingli Zheng and Hozhabr Mozafari and Zhiqiang Li and Linxia Gu and Meiwen An and Xinwei Han and Zhong You",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1142/S0219519419500386",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
journal = "Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology",
issn = "0219-5194",
publisher = "World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mechanical characterization of braided self-expanding stents

T2 - Impact of design parameters

AU - Zheng, Qingli

AU - Mozafari, Hozhabr

AU - Li, Zhiqiang

AU - Gu, Linxia

AU - An, Meiwen

AU - Han, Xinwei

AU - You, Zhong

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - In this paper, the mechanical performance of braided nitinol stents was systematically studied to provide guidelines for optimum stent designs. The influences of braiding patterns, braiding angles, wire diameters, and strand numbers on the mechanical behavior of the stent in terms of crimping strain, radial strength, longitudinal flexibility, and stability were characterized utilizing finite element method. Our results have shown that the two key design factors of braided stents are the braiding angle and wire diameter. A smaller braiding angle can increase radial stiffness and have better longitudinal flexibility and can maintain the stent stability. The wire diameter has less influence on the radial stiffness than the braiding angle, but the longitudinal flexibility is most sensitive to the wire diameter. The strand number is directly proportional to the radial stiffness and inversely proportional to the longitudinal flexibility. Compared to the classical crossing pattern, we have also proposed two patterns. These patterns have a minimal impact on the crimping and radial stiffness of stents, but the stent made from them are more flexible. Among three crossing patterns, it is interesting to see that the classical pattern is the most stable crossing pattern for stand numbers larger than 36, but it became the most unstable pattern at the strand number of 24. This work has shed light on the optimum design of braided stents.

AB - In this paper, the mechanical performance of braided nitinol stents was systematically studied to provide guidelines for optimum stent designs. The influences of braiding patterns, braiding angles, wire diameters, and strand numbers on the mechanical behavior of the stent in terms of crimping strain, radial strength, longitudinal flexibility, and stability were characterized utilizing finite element method. Our results have shown that the two key design factors of braided stents are the braiding angle and wire diameter. A smaller braiding angle can increase radial stiffness and have better longitudinal flexibility and can maintain the stent stability. The wire diameter has less influence on the radial stiffness than the braiding angle, but the longitudinal flexibility is most sensitive to the wire diameter. The strand number is directly proportional to the radial stiffness and inversely proportional to the longitudinal flexibility. Compared to the classical crossing pattern, we have also proposed two patterns. These patterns have a minimal impact on the crimping and radial stiffness of stents, but the stent made from them are more flexible. Among three crossing patterns, it is interesting to see that the classical pattern is the most stable crossing pattern for stand numbers larger than 36, but it became the most unstable pattern at the strand number of 24. This work has shed light on the optimum design of braided stents.

KW - Nitinol braided stents

KW - crimping

KW - design parameters

KW - finite element analysis

KW - flexibility

KW - radial strength

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072126093&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072126093&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1142/S0219519419500386

DO - 10.1142/S0219519419500386

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85072126093

VL - 19

JO - Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology

JF - Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology

SN - 0219-5194

IS - 6

M1 - 1950038

ER -