Measuring the Cost and Value of Quality Improvement Initiatives for Local Health Departments

Li-Wu Chen, Fernando Wilson, Abbey Gregg, Niodita Gupta, Sarbinaz Bekmuratova, David W Palm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate an approach to measuring the cost and value of quality improvement (QI) implementation in local health departments (LHDs). DESIGN: We conducted cost estimation for 4 LHD QI projects and return-on-investment (ROI) analysis for 2 selected LHD QI projects. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Four Nebraska LHDs varying in rurality and jurisdiction size. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total costs, unit costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, and ROI. RESULTS: The 4 QI projects vary significantly in their cost estimates. Estimated ROI ratios for 2 QI projects predicted significant savings in health care utilization for respective program participants. A QI project focused on improving breastfeeding rates in WIC (women, infants, and children) clients had a predicted ROI ratio of 3230% and a QI project for improving participation in a Chronic Disease Self-Management Program would need only 34 new participants to have a positive ROI. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated how data can be collected and analyzed for cost estimation and ROI analysis to quantify the economic value of QI for LHDs. Our ROI analysis shows that QI initiatives have great potential to enhance the value of LHDs' public health services. A better understanding of the costs and value of QI will enable LHDs to appropriately allocate and utilize their limited resources for suitable QI initiatives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)164-171
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of public health management and practice : JPHMP
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
United States Public Health Service
Self Care
Disease Management
Breast Feeding
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Chronic Disease
Economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Measuring the Cost and Value of Quality Improvement Initiatives for Local Health Departments. / Chen, Li-Wu; Wilson, Fernando; Gregg, Abbey; Gupta, Niodita; Bekmuratova, Sarbinaz; Palm, David W.

In: Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP, Vol. 24, No. 2, 01.03.2018, p. 164-171.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a7b17ccab0a24099be4402fb28a0d01d,
title = "Measuring the Cost and Value of Quality Improvement Initiatives for Local Health Departments",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate an approach to measuring the cost and value of quality improvement (QI) implementation in local health departments (LHDs). DESIGN: We conducted cost estimation for 4 LHD QI projects and return-on-investment (ROI) analysis for 2 selected LHD QI projects. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Four Nebraska LHDs varying in rurality and jurisdiction size. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total costs, unit costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, and ROI. RESULTS: The 4 QI projects vary significantly in their cost estimates. Estimated ROI ratios for 2 QI projects predicted significant savings in health care utilization for respective program participants. A QI project focused on improving breastfeeding rates in WIC (women, infants, and children) clients had a predicted ROI ratio of 3230{\%} and a QI project for improving participation in a Chronic Disease Self-Management Program would need only 34 new participants to have a positive ROI. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated how data can be collected and analyzed for cost estimation and ROI analysis to quantify the economic value of QI for LHDs. Our ROI analysis shows that QI initiatives have great potential to enhance the value of LHDs' public health services. A better understanding of the costs and value of QI will enable LHDs to appropriately allocate and utilize their limited resources for suitable QI initiatives.",
author = "Li-Wu Chen and Fernando Wilson and Abbey Gregg and Niodita Gupta and Sarbinaz Bekmuratova and Palm, {David W}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PHH.0000000000000552",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "164--171",
journal = "Journal of Public Health Management and Practice",
issn = "1078-4659",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring the Cost and Value of Quality Improvement Initiatives for Local Health Departments

AU - Chen, Li-Wu

AU - Wilson, Fernando

AU - Gregg, Abbey

AU - Gupta, Niodita

AU - Bekmuratova, Sarbinaz

AU - Palm, David W

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate an approach to measuring the cost and value of quality improvement (QI) implementation in local health departments (LHDs). DESIGN: We conducted cost estimation for 4 LHD QI projects and return-on-investment (ROI) analysis for 2 selected LHD QI projects. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Four Nebraska LHDs varying in rurality and jurisdiction size. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total costs, unit costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, and ROI. RESULTS: The 4 QI projects vary significantly in their cost estimates. Estimated ROI ratios for 2 QI projects predicted significant savings in health care utilization for respective program participants. A QI project focused on improving breastfeeding rates in WIC (women, infants, and children) clients had a predicted ROI ratio of 3230% and a QI project for improving participation in a Chronic Disease Self-Management Program would need only 34 new participants to have a positive ROI. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated how data can be collected and analyzed for cost estimation and ROI analysis to quantify the economic value of QI for LHDs. Our ROI analysis shows that QI initiatives have great potential to enhance the value of LHDs' public health services. A better understanding of the costs and value of QI will enable LHDs to appropriately allocate and utilize their limited resources for suitable QI initiatives.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate an approach to measuring the cost and value of quality improvement (QI) implementation in local health departments (LHDs). DESIGN: We conducted cost estimation for 4 LHD QI projects and return-on-investment (ROI) analysis for 2 selected LHD QI projects. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Four Nebraska LHDs varying in rurality and jurisdiction size. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total costs, unit costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, and ROI. RESULTS: The 4 QI projects vary significantly in their cost estimates. Estimated ROI ratios for 2 QI projects predicted significant savings in health care utilization for respective program participants. A QI project focused on improving breastfeeding rates in WIC (women, infants, and children) clients had a predicted ROI ratio of 3230% and a QI project for improving participation in a Chronic Disease Self-Management Program would need only 34 new participants to have a positive ROI. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated how data can be collected and analyzed for cost estimation and ROI analysis to quantify the economic value of QI for LHDs. Our ROI analysis shows that QI initiatives have great potential to enhance the value of LHDs' public health services. A better understanding of the costs and value of QI will enable LHDs to appropriately allocate and utilize their limited resources for suitable QI initiatives.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014205788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014205788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000552

DO - 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000552

M3 - Article

C2 - 28257401

AN - SCOPUS:85014205788

VL - 24

SP - 164

EP - 171

JO - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

JF - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

SN - 1078-4659

IS - 2

ER -