Measurement of vertical track modulus - Field testing, repeatablity, and effects of track geometry

Sheng Lu, Shane Farritor, Richard Arnold, William GeMeiner, Dwight Clark, Mahmood Fateh, Leith Al-Nazer, Gary Carr, Magdy El-Sibaie

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The heavy axle loads and high speeds of modern freight trains produce high track stresses leading to quicker track degradation. Track loads can be increased by variations in vertical track stiffness - the relationship between vertical rail deflection and the vertical applied load - and vertical track modulus. Both low track modulus and large variations in track modulus (leading to increased dynamic loading) cause accelerated track degradation and associated increased maintenance requirements. The University of Nebraska, under sponsorship from the Federal Railroad Administration, continues to develop a method to measure vertical track deflection and modulus from a rail car traveling at revenue speed. This paper first summarizes past work to develop a method to measure vertical track deflection from a moving rail car. The measurement is made by attaching a beam to the sideframe of a loaded hopper car that extends along the rail toward the car's center. Then the deflection of the rail is measured approximately four feet from the inner wheel using a camera/laser system. The measurement determines the offset between the rail and the line established by the two wheel/rail contact points. These deflection measurements can then be used to estimate track modulus. Results are presented for repeated tests on approximately three hundred miles of heavy axle load freight line over a period of about ten months. These results have shown that the measurements of the above system are extremely repeatable and are not significantly related to train speed. The measurements also show seasonal variations in track modulus caused by factors such as variations in subgrade moisture and ambient temperature. The system has shown a notable ability to identify locations at high risk of derailments. After each of the four tests, a "top ten" list was created indicating the largest changes in relative deflection in descending order (one top ten list corresponding to each of the four tests). The lists were created based on exception criteria presented by the authors at last year's conference. Four derailments occurred over this ten month period and three of those derailments appear in the top ten lists (#2, #10, in list one and #1 in list four). Finally, simulation and experimental analysis that quantify and assess the co-relation between this system and track geometry is presented. Extreme track geometry variations can create errors as the relative deflection measurement is mapped into a specific value of track modulus. This effect is also quantified and described.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of the ASME/IEEE/ASCE Joint Rail Conference, JRC 2008
Pages151-158
Number of pages8
StatePublished - Dec 1 2008
EventASME/IEEE/ASCE Joint Rail Conference, JRC 2008 - Wilmington, DE, United States
Duration: Apr 22 2008Apr 24 2008

Publication series

NameProceedings of the ASME/IEEE/ASCE Joint Rail Conference, JRC 2008

Conference

ConferenceASME/IEEE/ASCE Joint Rail Conference, JRC 2008
CountryUnited States
CityWilmington, DE
Period4/22/084/24/08

Fingerprint

Rails
mathematics
Derailments
Geometry
Testing
Railroad tracks
Railroad cars
Axles
Hopper cars
Wheels
seasonal variation
sponsorship
Degradation
railroad
Railroads
Point contacts
revenue
Loads (forces)
contact
Moisture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Transportation

Cite this

Lu, S., Farritor, S., Arnold, R., GeMeiner, W., Clark, D., Fateh, M., ... El-Sibaie, M. (2008). Measurement of vertical track modulus - Field testing, repeatablity, and effects of track geometry. In Proceedings of the ASME/IEEE/ASCE Joint Rail Conference, JRC 2008 (pp. 151-158). (Proceedings of the ASME/IEEE/ASCE Joint Rail Conference, JRC 2008).

Measurement of vertical track modulus - Field testing, repeatablity, and effects of track geometry. / Lu, Sheng; Farritor, Shane; Arnold, Richard; GeMeiner, William; Clark, Dwight; Fateh, Mahmood; Al-Nazer, Leith; Carr, Gary; El-Sibaie, Magdy.

Proceedings of the ASME/IEEE/ASCE Joint Rail Conference, JRC 2008. 2008. p. 151-158 (Proceedings of the ASME/IEEE/ASCE Joint Rail Conference, JRC 2008).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Lu, S, Farritor, S, Arnold, R, GeMeiner, W, Clark, D, Fateh, M, Al-Nazer, L, Carr, G & El-Sibaie, M 2008, Measurement of vertical track modulus - Field testing, repeatablity, and effects of track geometry. in Proceedings of the ASME/IEEE/ASCE Joint Rail Conference, JRC 2008. Proceedings of the ASME/IEEE/ASCE Joint Rail Conference, JRC 2008, pp. 151-158, ASME/IEEE/ASCE Joint Rail Conference, JRC 2008, Wilmington, DE, United States, 4/22/08.
Lu S, Farritor S, Arnold R, GeMeiner W, Clark D, Fateh M et al. Measurement of vertical track modulus - Field testing, repeatablity, and effects of track geometry. In Proceedings of the ASME/IEEE/ASCE Joint Rail Conference, JRC 2008. 2008. p. 151-158. (Proceedings of the ASME/IEEE/ASCE Joint Rail Conference, JRC 2008).
Lu, Sheng ; Farritor, Shane ; Arnold, Richard ; GeMeiner, William ; Clark, Dwight ; Fateh, Mahmood ; Al-Nazer, Leith ; Carr, Gary ; El-Sibaie, Magdy. / Measurement of vertical track modulus - Field testing, repeatablity, and effects of track geometry. Proceedings of the ASME/IEEE/ASCE Joint Rail Conference, JRC 2008. 2008. pp. 151-158 (Proceedings of the ASME/IEEE/ASCE Joint Rail Conference, JRC 2008).
@inproceedings{f7a41fc915ec4ce181541aeac1eb4ca3,
title = "Measurement of vertical track modulus - Field testing, repeatablity, and effects of track geometry",
abstract = "The heavy axle loads and high speeds of modern freight trains produce high track stresses leading to quicker track degradation. Track loads can be increased by variations in vertical track stiffness - the relationship between vertical rail deflection and the vertical applied load - and vertical track modulus. Both low track modulus and large variations in track modulus (leading to increased dynamic loading) cause accelerated track degradation and associated increased maintenance requirements. The University of Nebraska, under sponsorship from the Federal Railroad Administration, continues to develop a method to measure vertical track deflection and modulus from a rail car traveling at revenue speed. This paper first summarizes past work to develop a method to measure vertical track deflection from a moving rail car. The measurement is made by attaching a beam to the sideframe of a loaded hopper car that extends along the rail toward the car's center. Then the deflection of the rail is measured approximately four feet from the inner wheel using a camera/laser system. The measurement determines the offset between the rail and the line established by the two wheel/rail contact points. These deflection measurements can then be used to estimate track modulus. Results are presented for repeated tests on approximately three hundred miles of heavy axle load freight line over a period of about ten months. These results have shown that the measurements of the above system are extremely repeatable and are not significantly related to train speed. The measurements also show seasonal variations in track modulus caused by factors such as variations in subgrade moisture and ambient temperature. The system has shown a notable ability to identify locations at high risk of derailments. After each of the four tests, a {"}top ten{"} list was created indicating the largest changes in relative deflection in descending order (one top ten list corresponding to each of the four tests). The lists were created based on exception criteria presented by the authors at last year's conference. Four derailments occurred over this ten month period and three of those derailments appear in the top ten lists (#2, #10, in list one and #1 in list four). Finally, simulation and experimental analysis that quantify and assess the co-relation between this system and track geometry is presented. Extreme track geometry variations can create errors as the relative deflection measurement is mapped into a specific value of track modulus. This effect is also quantified and described.",
author = "Sheng Lu and Shane Farritor and Richard Arnold and William GeMeiner and Dwight Clark and Mahmood Fateh and Leith Al-Nazer and Gary Carr and Magdy El-Sibaie",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0791848124",
series = "Proceedings of the ASME/IEEE/ASCE Joint Rail Conference, JRC 2008",
pages = "151--158",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the ASME/IEEE/ASCE Joint Rail Conference, JRC 2008",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Measurement of vertical track modulus - Field testing, repeatablity, and effects of track geometry

AU - Lu, Sheng

AU - Farritor, Shane

AU - Arnold, Richard

AU - GeMeiner, William

AU - Clark, Dwight

AU - Fateh, Mahmood

AU - Al-Nazer, Leith

AU - Carr, Gary

AU - El-Sibaie, Magdy

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

N2 - The heavy axle loads and high speeds of modern freight trains produce high track stresses leading to quicker track degradation. Track loads can be increased by variations in vertical track stiffness - the relationship between vertical rail deflection and the vertical applied load - and vertical track modulus. Both low track modulus and large variations in track modulus (leading to increased dynamic loading) cause accelerated track degradation and associated increased maintenance requirements. The University of Nebraska, under sponsorship from the Federal Railroad Administration, continues to develop a method to measure vertical track deflection and modulus from a rail car traveling at revenue speed. This paper first summarizes past work to develop a method to measure vertical track deflection from a moving rail car. The measurement is made by attaching a beam to the sideframe of a loaded hopper car that extends along the rail toward the car's center. Then the deflection of the rail is measured approximately four feet from the inner wheel using a camera/laser system. The measurement determines the offset between the rail and the line established by the two wheel/rail contact points. These deflection measurements can then be used to estimate track modulus. Results are presented for repeated tests on approximately three hundred miles of heavy axle load freight line over a period of about ten months. These results have shown that the measurements of the above system are extremely repeatable and are not significantly related to train speed. The measurements also show seasonal variations in track modulus caused by factors such as variations in subgrade moisture and ambient temperature. The system has shown a notable ability to identify locations at high risk of derailments. After each of the four tests, a "top ten" list was created indicating the largest changes in relative deflection in descending order (one top ten list corresponding to each of the four tests). The lists were created based on exception criteria presented by the authors at last year's conference. Four derailments occurred over this ten month period and three of those derailments appear in the top ten lists (#2, #10, in list one and #1 in list four). Finally, simulation and experimental analysis that quantify and assess the co-relation between this system and track geometry is presented. Extreme track geometry variations can create errors as the relative deflection measurement is mapped into a specific value of track modulus. This effect is also quantified and described.

AB - The heavy axle loads and high speeds of modern freight trains produce high track stresses leading to quicker track degradation. Track loads can be increased by variations in vertical track stiffness - the relationship between vertical rail deflection and the vertical applied load - and vertical track modulus. Both low track modulus and large variations in track modulus (leading to increased dynamic loading) cause accelerated track degradation and associated increased maintenance requirements. The University of Nebraska, under sponsorship from the Federal Railroad Administration, continues to develop a method to measure vertical track deflection and modulus from a rail car traveling at revenue speed. This paper first summarizes past work to develop a method to measure vertical track deflection from a moving rail car. The measurement is made by attaching a beam to the sideframe of a loaded hopper car that extends along the rail toward the car's center. Then the deflection of the rail is measured approximately four feet from the inner wheel using a camera/laser system. The measurement determines the offset between the rail and the line established by the two wheel/rail contact points. These deflection measurements can then be used to estimate track modulus. Results are presented for repeated tests on approximately three hundred miles of heavy axle load freight line over a period of about ten months. These results have shown that the measurements of the above system are extremely repeatable and are not significantly related to train speed. The measurements also show seasonal variations in track modulus caused by factors such as variations in subgrade moisture and ambient temperature. The system has shown a notable ability to identify locations at high risk of derailments. After each of the four tests, a "top ten" list was created indicating the largest changes in relative deflection in descending order (one top ten list corresponding to each of the four tests). The lists were created based on exception criteria presented by the authors at last year's conference. Four derailments occurred over this ten month period and three of those derailments appear in the top ten lists (#2, #10, in list one and #1 in list four). Finally, simulation and experimental analysis that quantify and assess the co-relation between this system and track geometry is presented. Extreme track geometry variations can create errors as the relative deflection measurement is mapped into a specific value of track modulus. This effect is also quantified and described.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69949145507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69949145507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:69949145507

SN - 0791848124

SN - 9780791848128

T3 - Proceedings of the ASME/IEEE/ASCE Joint Rail Conference, JRC 2008

SP - 151

EP - 158

BT - Proceedings of the ASME/IEEE/ASCE Joint Rail Conference, JRC 2008

ER -