Material evidence: Interaction of well-learned priors and sensorimotor memory when lifting objects

Lee A. Baugh, Michelle Kao, Roland S. Johansson, J. Randall Flanagan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Skilled object lifting requires the prediction of object weight. When lifting new objects, such prediction is based on well-learned size-weight and material-density correlations, or priors. However, if the prediction is erroneous, people quickly learn the weight of the particular object and can use this knowledge, referred to as sensorimotor memory, when lifting the object again. In the present study, we explored how sensorimotor memory, gained when lifting a given object, interacts with welllearned material-density priors when predicting the weight of a larger but otherwise similar-looking object. Different groups of participants 1st lifted 1 of 4 small objects 10 times. These included a pair of wood-filled objects and a pair of brass-filled objects where 1 of each pair was covered in a wood veneer and the other was covered in a brass veneer. All groups then lifted a larger, brass-filled object with the same covering as the small object they had lifted. For each lift, we determined the initial peak rate of change of vertical load-force rate and the load-phase duration, which provide estimates of predicted object weight. Analysis of the 10th lift of the small cube revealed no effects of surface material, indicating participants learned the appropriate forces required to lift the small cube regardless of object appearance. However, both surface material and core material of the small cube affected the 1st lift of the large block. We conclude that sensorimotor memory related to object density can contribute to weight prediction when lifting novel objects but also that long-term priors related to material properties can influence the prediction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1262-1269
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Neurophysiology
Volume108
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2012

Fingerprint

Weights and Measures
brass

Keywords

  • Object lifting
  • Sensorimotor integration
  • Sensorimotor memory
  • Weight prediction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Physiology

Cite this

Material evidence : Interaction of well-learned priors and sensorimotor memory when lifting objects. / Baugh, Lee A.; Kao, Michelle; Johansson, Roland S.; Randall Flanagan, J.

In: Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol. 108, No. 5, 01.09.2012, p. 1262-1269.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Baugh, Lee A. ; Kao, Michelle ; Johansson, Roland S. ; Randall Flanagan, J. / Material evidence : Interaction of well-learned priors and sensorimotor memory when lifting objects. In: Journal of Neurophysiology. 2012 ; Vol. 108, No. 5. pp. 1262-1269.
@article{f277f59680d94788b34ae3df88ebd39e,
title = "Material evidence: Interaction of well-learned priors and sensorimotor memory when lifting objects",
abstract = "Skilled object lifting requires the prediction of object weight. When lifting new objects, such prediction is based on well-learned size-weight and material-density correlations, or priors. However, if the prediction is erroneous, people quickly learn the weight of the particular object and can use this knowledge, referred to as sensorimotor memory, when lifting the object again. In the present study, we explored how sensorimotor memory, gained when lifting a given object, interacts with welllearned material-density priors when predicting the weight of a larger but otherwise similar-looking object. Different groups of participants 1st lifted 1 of 4 small objects 10 times. These included a pair of wood-filled objects and a pair of brass-filled objects where 1 of each pair was covered in a wood veneer and the other was covered in a brass veneer. All groups then lifted a larger, brass-filled object with the same covering as the small object they had lifted. For each lift, we determined the initial peak rate of change of vertical load-force rate and the load-phase duration, which provide estimates of predicted object weight. Analysis of the 10th lift of the small cube revealed no effects of surface material, indicating participants learned the appropriate forces required to lift the small cube regardless of object appearance. However, both surface material and core material of the small cube affected the 1st lift of the large block. We conclude that sensorimotor memory related to object density can contribute to weight prediction when lifting novel objects but also that long-term priors related to material properties can influence the prediction.",
keywords = "Object lifting, Sensorimotor integration, Sensorimotor memory, Weight prediction",
author = "Baugh, {Lee A.} and Michelle Kao and Johansson, {Roland S.} and {Randall Flanagan}, J.",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1152/jn.00263.2012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "108",
pages = "1262--1269",
journal = "Journal of Neurophysiology",
issn = "0022-3077",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Material evidence

T2 - Interaction of well-learned priors and sensorimotor memory when lifting objects

AU - Baugh, Lee A.

AU - Kao, Michelle

AU - Johansson, Roland S.

AU - Randall Flanagan, J.

PY - 2012/9/1

Y1 - 2012/9/1

N2 - Skilled object lifting requires the prediction of object weight. When lifting new objects, such prediction is based on well-learned size-weight and material-density correlations, or priors. However, if the prediction is erroneous, people quickly learn the weight of the particular object and can use this knowledge, referred to as sensorimotor memory, when lifting the object again. In the present study, we explored how sensorimotor memory, gained when lifting a given object, interacts with welllearned material-density priors when predicting the weight of a larger but otherwise similar-looking object. Different groups of participants 1st lifted 1 of 4 small objects 10 times. These included a pair of wood-filled objects and a pair of brass-filled objects where 1 of each pair was covered in a wood veneer and the other was covered in a brass veneer. All groups then lifted a larger, brass-filled object with the same covering as the small object they had lifted. For each lift, we determined the initial peak rate of change of vertical load-force rate and the load-phase duration, which provide estimates of predicted object weight. Analysis of the 10th lift of the small cube revealed no effects of surface material, indicating participants learned the appropriate forces required to lift the small cube regardless of object appearance. However, both surface material and core material of the small cube affected the 1st lift of the large block. We conclude that sensorimotor memory related to object density can contribute to weight prediction when lifting novel objects but also that long-term priors related to material properties can influence the prediction.

AB - Skilled object lifting requires the prediction of object weight. When lifting new objects, such prediction is based on well-learned size-weight and material-density correlations, or priors. However, if the prediction is erroneous, people quickly learn the weight of the particular object and can use this knowledge, referred to as sensorimotor memory, when lifting the object again. In the present study, we explored how sensorimotor memory, gained when lifting a given object, interacts with welllearned material-density priors when predicting the weight of a larger but otherwise similar-looking object. Different groups of participants 1st lifted 1 of 4 small objects 10 times. These included a pair of wood-filled objects and a pair of brass-filled objects where 1 of each pair was covered in a wood veneer and the other was covered in a brass veneer. All groups then lifted a larger, brass-filled object with the same covering as the small object they had lifted. For each lift, we determined the initial peak rate of change of vertical load-force rate and the load-phase duration, which provide estimates of predicted object weight. Analysis of the 10th lift of the small cube revealed no effects of surface material, indicating participants learned the appropriate forces required to lift the small cube regardless of object appearance. However, both surface material and core material of the small cube affected the 1st lift of the large block. We conclude that sensorimotor memory related to object density can contribute to weight prediction when lifting novel objects but also that long-term priors related to material properties can influence the prediction.

KW - Object lifting

KW - Sensorimotor integration

KW - Sensorimotor memory

KW - Weight prediction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865832383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865832383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/jn.00263.2012

DO - 10.1152/jn.00263.2012

M3 - Article

C2 - 22696542

AN - SCOPUS:84865832383

VL - 108

SP - 1262

EP - 1269

JO - Journal of Neurophysiology

JF - Journal of Neurophysiology

SN - 0022-3077

IS - 5

ER -