Mapping ophthalmic terms to a standardized vocabulary

Timothy B. Patrick, John C. Reid, Maryellen Sievert, Mihail Popescu, James W Gigantelli, Mark E. Shelton, Jade S. Schiffman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO is working to expand the standardized vocabulary, Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED), to accommodate a definitive ophthalmic standardized vocabulary. We mapped a practice-based clinical ophthalmic vocabulary to SNOMED and to the other vocabularies in the Metathesaurus of the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) to see what terms currently existed both in the practice-based vocabulary and in the standardized vocabularies, to identify what terms might be added to the standardized vocabularies, and to see what existing broader terms in the standardized vocabularies could be expanded. We normalized terms in our practice-based clinical ophthalmic vocabulary and compared them to normalized terms in the standardized vocabularies. We stripped off modifiers from nonmatching terms to see if the resulting stripped terms matched to broader terms in the standardized vocabularies. Twelve percent of our practice-based terms exactly matched a term in one of the standardized vocabularies (including SNOMED). About 43% of the remaining terms stripped of modifiers partially matched terms in the standardized vocabularies. Computer matching rapidly identifies what ophthalmic terms currently exist in standardized vocabularies, what broader terms in standardized vocabularies are candidates for expansion, and what terms unique to ophthalmology may need to be added to the standardized vocabularies to create a definitive ophthalmic vocabulary.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)190-201
Number of pages12
JournalProceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting
Volume37
StatePublished - Dec 1 2000

Fingerprint

Terminology
Medicine
vocabulary
Ophthalmology
medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Patrick, T. B., Reid, J. C., Sievert, M., Popescu, M., Gigantelli, J. W., Shelton, M. E., & Schiffman, J. S. (2000). Mapping ophthalmic terms to a standardized vocabulary. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, 37, 190-201.

Mapping ophthalmic terms to a standardized vocabulary. / Patrick, Timothy B.; Reid, John C.; Sievert, Maryellen; Popescu, Mihail; Gigantelli, James W; Shelton, Mark E.; Schiffman, Jade S.

In: Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, Vol. 37, 01.12.2000, p. 190-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Patrick, TB, Reid, JC, Sievert, M, Popescu, M, Gigantelli, JW, Shelton, ME & Schiffman, JS 2000, 'Mapping ophthalmic terms to a standardized vocabulary', Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, vol. 37, pp. 190-201.
Patrick TB, Reid JC, Sievert M, Popescu M, Gigantelli JW, Shelton ME et al. Mapping ophthalmic terms to a standardized vocabulary. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting. 2000 Dec 1;37:190-201.
Patrick, Timothy B. ; Reid, John C. ; Sievert, Maryellen ; Popescu, Mihail ; Gigantelli, James W ; Shelton, Mark E. ; Schiffman, Jade S. / Mapping ophthalmic terms to a standardized vocabulary. In: Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting. 2000 ; Vol. 37. pp. 190-201.
@article{da6a7ef694054b37b56769f10cfa1f86,
title = "Mapping ophthalmic terms to a standardized vocabulary",
abstract = "The American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO is working to expand the standardized vocabulary, Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED), to accommodate a definitive ophthalmic standardized vocabulary. We mapped a practice-based clinical ophthalmic vocabulary to SNOMED and to the other vocabularies in the Metathesaurus of the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) to see what terms currently existed both in the practice-based vocabulary and in the standardized vocabularies, to identify what terms might be added to the standardized vocabularies, and to see what existing broader terms in the standardized vocabularies could be expanded. We normalized terms in our practice-based clinical ophthalmic vocabulary and compared them to normalized terms in the standardized vocabularies. We stripped off modifiers from nonmatching terms to see if the resulting stripped terms matched to broader terms in the standardized vocabularies. Twelve percent of our practice-based terms exactly matched a term in one of the standardized vocabularies (including SNOMED). About 43{\%} of the remaining terms stripped of modifiers partially matched terms in the standardized vocabularies. Computer matching rapidly identifies what ophthalmic terms currently exist in standardized vocabularies, what broader terms in standardized vocabularies are candidates for expansion, and what terms unique to ophthalmology may need to be added to the standardized vocabularies to create a definitive ophthalmic vocabulary.",
author = "Patrick, {Timothy B.} and Reid, {John C.} and Maryellen Sievert and Mihail Popescu and Gigantelli, {James W} and Shelton, {Mark E.} and Schiffman, {Jade S.}",
year = "2000",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "190--201",
journal = "Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting",
issn = "1550-8390",
publisher = "Learned Information",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mapping ophthalmic terms to a standardized vocabulary

AU - Patrick, Timothy B.

AU - Reid, John C.

AU - Sievert, Maryellen

AU - Popescu, Mihail

AU - Gigantelli, James W

AU - Shelton, Mark E.

AU - Schiffman, Jade S.

PY - 2000/12/1

Y1 - 2000/12/1

N2 - The American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO is working to expand the standardized vocabulary, Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED), to accommodate a definitive ophthalmic standardized vocabulary. We mapped a practice-based clinical ophthalmic vocabulary to SNOMED and to the other vocabularies in the Metathesaurus of the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) to see what terms currently existed both in the practice-based vocabulary and in the standardized vocabularies, to identify what terms might be added to the standardized vocabularies, and to see what existing broader terms in the standardized vocabularies could be expanded. We normalized terms in our practice-based clinical ophthalmic vocabulary and compared them to normalized terms in the standardized vocabularies. We stripped off modifiers from nonmatching terms to see if the resulting stripped terms matched to broader terms in the standardized vocabularies. Twelve percent of our practice-based terms exactly matched a term in one of the standardized vocabularies (including SNOMED). About 43% of the remaining terms stripped of modifiers partially matched terms in the standardized vocabularies. Computer matching rapidly identifies what ophthalmic terms currently exist in standardized vocabularies, what broader terms in standardized vocabularies are candidates for expansion, and what terms unique to ophthalmology may need to be added to the standardized vocabularies to create a definitive ophthalmic vocabulary.

AB - The American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO is working to expand the standardized vocabulary, Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED), to accommodate a definitive ophthalmic standardized vocabulary. We mapped a practice-based clinical ophthalmic vocabulary to SNOMED and to the other vocabularies in the Metathesaurus of the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) to see what terms currently existed both in the practice-based vocabulary and in the standardized vocabularies, to identify what terms might be added to the standardized vocabularies, and to see what existing broader terms in the standardized vocabularies could be expanded. We normalized terms in our practice-based clinical ophthalmic vocabulary and compared them to normalized terms in the standardized vocabularies. We stripped off modifiers from nonmatching terms to see if the resulting stripped terms matched to broader terms in the standardized vocabularies. Twelve percent of our practice-based terms exactly matched a term in one of the standardized vocabularies (including SNOMED). About 43% of the remaining terms stripped of modifiers partially matched terms in the standardized vocabularies. Computer matching rapidly identifies what ophthalmic terms currently exist in standardized vocabularies, what broader terms in standardized vocabularies are candidates for expansion, and what terms unique to ophthalmology may need to be added to the standardized vocabularies to create a definitive ophthalmic vocabulary.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=31844444169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=31844444169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 190

EP - 201

JO - Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting

JF - Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting

SN - 1550-8390

ER -