Management recommendations based on matrix projection models: The importance of considering biological limits

Joan Lubben, Brigitte Tenhumberg, Andrew Tyre, Richard Rebarber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Matrix population models are a common tool for evaluating different management strategies. In general, under deterministic analyses, management strategies are recommended that improve those matrix transitions that are most sensitive or elastic with respect to the asymptotic population growth rate, λ. These recommendations usually ignore the biological limit for these transitions. In this paper we use the endangered Serengeti cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) as a case study to illustrate that ignoring biological limits leads to a recommendation that will not always achieve the desired goal of an asymptotic population growth rate, λ ≥ 1. We estimate the survivorships of adult cheetahs in captivity using cheetah studbook data, which is a conservative estimate of the biological limit for the adult survivorship of wild cheetahs. Our analysis suggests that adult survival sharply decreases after 8.5 years. In addition, captive cheetahs older than 18 years do not reproduce. We modify a previously published population projection matrix to include the effect of senescence on survival and fecundity. Our model suggests that increasing adult survivorship alone is not sufficient to reverse population decline. However, an additional small increase in newborn survival is likely to result in a viable cheetah population. We show these conclusions hold even in the presence of relatively large parameter perturbations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)517-523
Number of pages7
JournalBiological Conservation
Volume141
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2008

Fingerprint

Acinonyx jubatus
survivorship
matrix
population growth
survival rate
captivity
population decline
senescence
fecundity
perturbation
recommendation
neonates
case studies

Keywords

  • Cheetah
  • Endangered species
  • Longevity
  • Population management
  • Population projection matrix
  • Senescence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Management recommendations based on matrix projection models : The importance of considering biological limits. / Lubben, Joan; Tenhumberg, Brigitte; Tyre, Andrew; Rebarber, Richard.

In: Biological Conservation, Vol. 141, No. 2, 01.02.2008, p. 517-523.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lubben, Joan ; Tenhumberg, Brigitte ; Tyre, Andrew ; Rebarber, Richard. / Management recommendations based on matrix projection models : The importance of considering biological limits. In: Biological Conservation. 2008 ; Vol. 141, No. 2. pp. 517-523.
@article{1fa22618916f42218bbfef8443697995,
title = "Management recommendations based on matrix projection models: The importance of considering biological limits",
abstract = "Matrix population models are a common tool for evaluating different management strategies. In general, under deterministic analyses, management strategies are recommended that improve those matrix transitions that are most sensitive or elastic with respect to the asymptotic population growth rate, λ. These recommendations usually ignore the biological limit for these transitions. In this paper we use the endangered Serengeti cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) as a case study to illustrate that ignoring biological limits leads to a recommendation that will not always achieve the desired goal of an asymptotic population growth rate, λ ≥ 1. We estimate the survivorships of adult cheetahs in captivity using cheetah studbook data, which is a conservative estimate of the biological limit for the adult survivorship of wild cheetahs. Our analysis suggests that adult survival sharply decreases after 8.5 years. In addition, captive cheetahs older than 18 years do not reproduce. We modify a previously published population projection matrix to include the effect of senescence on survival and fecundity. Our model suggests that increasing adult survivorship alone is not sufficient to reverse population decline. However, an additional small increase in newborn survival is likely to result in a viable cheetah population. We show these conclusions hold even in the presence of relatively large parameter perturbations.",
keywords = "Cheetah, Endangered species, Longevity, Population management, Population projection matrix, Senescence",
author = "Joan Lubben and Brigitte Tenhumberg and Andrew Tyre and Richard Rebarber",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.biocon.2007.11.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "141",
pages = "517--523",
journal = "Biological Conservation",
issn = "0006-3207",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management recommendations based on matrix projection models

T2 - The importance of considering biological limits

AU - Lubben, Joan

AU - Tenhumberg, Brigitte

AU - Tyre, Andrew

AU - Rebarber, Richard

PY - 2008/2/1

Y1 - 2008/2/1

N2 - Matrix population models are a common tool for evaluating different management strategies. In general, under deterministic analyses, management strategies are recommended that improve those matrix transitions that are most sensitive or elastic with respect to the asymptotic population growth rate, λ. These recommendations usually ignore the biological limit for these transitions. In this paper we use the endangered Serengeti cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) as a case study to illustrate that ignoring biological limits leads to a recommendation that will not always achieve the desired goal of an asymptotic population growth rate, λ ≥ 1. We estimate the survivorships of adult cheetahs in captivity using cheetah studbook data, which is a conservative estimate of the biological limit for the adult survivorship of wild cheetahs. Our analysis suggests that adult survival sharply decreases after 8.5 years. In addition, captive cheetahs older than 18 years do not reproduce. We modify a previously published population projection matrix to include the effect of senescence on survival and fecundity. Our model suggests that increasing adult survivorship alone is not sufficient to reverse population decline. However, an additional small increase in newborn survival is likely to result in a viable cheetah population. We show these conclusions hold even in the presence of relatively large parameter perturbations.

AB - Matrix population models are a common tool for evaluating different management strategies. In general, under deterministic analyses, management strategies are recommended that improve those matrix transitions that are most sensitive or elastic with respect to the asymptotic population growth rate, λ. These recommendations usually ignore the biological limit for these transitions. In this paper we use the endangered Serengeti cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) as a case study to illustrate that ignoring biological limits leads to a recommendation that will not always achieve the desired goal of an asymptotic population growth rate, λ ≥ 1. We estimate the survivorships of adult cheetahs in captivity using cheetah studbook data, which is a conservative estimate of the biological limit for the adult survivorship of wild cheetahs. Our analysis suggests that adult survival sharply decreases after 8.5 years. In addition, captive cheetahs older than 18 years do not reproduce. We modify a previously published population projection matrix to include the effect of senescence on survival and fecundity. Our model suggests that increasing adult survivorship alone is not sufficient to reverse population decline. However, an additional small increase in newborn survival is likely to result in a viable cheetah population. We show these conclusions hold even in the presence of relatively large parameter perturbations.

KW - Cheetah

KW - Endangered species

KW - Longevity

KW - Population management

KW - Population projection matrix

KW - Senescence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39649098039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39649098039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.11.003

DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.11.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:39649098039

VL - 141

SP - 517

EP - 523

JO - Biological Conservation

JF - Biological Conservation

SN - 0006-3207

IS - 2

ER -