Management options in thoracolumbar burst fractures

Patrick W. Hitchon, James C. Torner, Souheil F. Haddad, Kenneth A Follett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

93 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both surgery and recumbency have been adopted in the treatment of spinal fractures. Herein we present the indications for each, and our experience with thoracolumbar junction (T12, L1 and L2) burst fractures. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures were treated operatively in 36 cases, and nonoperatively in 32 with recumbency for 1-6 weeks. Treatment was based on clinical and radiological criteria. Eighty-one percent of the recumbency patients, but only 14% of the surgical patients were intact on admission. Patients were followed for a mean ± SD of 9 ± 10 months in the recumbency group, and 21 ± 21 months in the surgical group. RESULTS: Neurological improvement and progressive angular deformity occurred in both groups. The cost of recumbency in our patients was nearly half that of those who required surgery, though the length of hospitalization between the two groups was similar at 1 month ± 2 weeks. CONCLUSION: The above study emphasizes that the selection of operative versus nonoperative treatment in burst fractures should not be random but based on clinical as well as radiological criteria. Recumbency is favored in patients who are intact, with angular deformity less than 20°, a residual spinal canal greater than 50% of normal, and an anterior body height exceeding 50% of the posterior height. Surgical intervention is generally indicated in patients with partial neurological deficit, and those with severe instability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)619-627
Number of pages9
JournalSurgical neurology
Volume49
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 1998

Fingerprint

Spinal Fractures
Spinal Canal
Body Height
Hospitalization
Therapeutics
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Spinal cord injury
  • Spinal stabilization instrumentation
  • Spinal trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Management options in thoracolumbar burst fractures. / Hitchon, Patrick W.; Torner, James C.; Haddad, Souheil F.; Follett, Kenneth A.

In: Surgical neurology, Vol. 49, No. 6, 01.06.1998, p. 619-627.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hitchon, Patrick W. ; Torner, James C. ; Haddad, Souheil F. ; Follett, Kenneth A. / Management options in thoracolumbar burst fractures. In: Surgical neurology. 1998 ; Vol. 49, No. 6. pp. 619-627.
@article{35016e29d48e4615862a075196610662,
title = "Management options in thoracolumbar burst fractures",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Both surgery and recumbency have been adopted in the treatment of spinal fractures. Herein we present the indications for each, and our experience with thoracolumbar junction (T12, L1 and L2) burst fractures. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures were treated operatively in 36 cases, and nonoperatively in 32 with recumbency for 1-6 weeks. Treatment was based on clinical and radiological criteria. Eighty-one percent of the recumbency patients, but only 14{\%} of the surgical patients were intact on admission. Patients were followed for a mean ± SD of 9 ± 10 months in the recumbency group, and 21 ± 21 months in the surgical group. RESULTS: Neurological improvement and progressive angular deformity occurred in both groups. The cost of recumbency in our patients was nearly half that of those who required surgery, though the length of hospitalization between the two groups was similar at 1 month ± 2 weeks. CONCLUSION: The above study emphasizes that the selection of operative versus nonoperative treatment in burst fractures should not be random but based on clinical as well as radiological criteria. Recumbency is favored in patients who are intact, with angular deformity less than 20°, a residual spinal canal greater than 50{\%} of normal, and an anterior body height exceeding 50{\%} of the posterior height. Surgical intervention is generally indicated in patients with partial neurological deficit, and those with severe instability.",
keywords = "Spinal cord injury, Spinal stabilization instrumentation, Spinal trauma",
author = "Hitchon, {Patrick W.} and Torner, {James C.} and Haddad, {Souheil F.} and Follett, {Kenneth A}",
year = "1998",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0090-3019(97)00527-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "619--627",
journal = "World Neurosurgery",
issn = "1878-8750",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management options in thoracolumbar burst fractures

AU - Hitchon, Patrick W.

AU - Torner, James C.

AU - Haddad, Souheil F.

AU - Follett, Kenneth A

PY - 1998/6/1

Y1 - 1998/6/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Both surgery and recumbency have been adopted in the treatment of spinal fractures. Herein we present the indications for each, and our experience with thoracolumbar junction (T12, L1 and L2) burst fractures. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures were treated operatively in 36 cases, and nonoperatively in 32 with recumbency for 1-6 weeks. Treatment was based on clinical and radiological criteria. Eighty-one percent of the recumbency patients, but only 14% of the surgical patients were intact on admission. Patients were followed for a mean ± SD of 9 ± 10 months in the recumbency group, and 21 ± 21 months in the surgical group. RESULTS: Neurological improvement and progressive angular deformity occurred in both groups. The cost of recumbency in our patients was nearly half that of those who required surgery, though the length of hospitalization between the two groups was similar at 1 month ± 2 weeks. CONCLUSION: The above study emphasizes that the selection of operative versus nonoperative treatment in burst fractures should not be random but based on clinical as well as radiological criteria. Recumbency is favored in patients who are intact, with angular deformity less than 20°, a residual spinal canal greater than 50% of normal, and an anterior body height exceeding 50% of the posterior height. Surgical intervention is generally indicated in patients with partial neurological deficit, and those with severe instability.

AB - BACKGROUND: Both surgery and recumbency have been adopted in the treatment of spinal fractures. Herein we present the indications for each, and our experience with thoracolumbar junction (T12, L1 and L2) burst fractures. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures were treated operatively in 36 cases, and nonoperatively in 32 with recumbency for 1-6 weeks. Treatment was based on clinical and radiological criteria. Eighty-one percent of the recumbency patients, but only 14% of the surgical patients were intact on admission. Patients were followed for a mean ± SD of 9 ± 10 months in the recumbency group, and 21 ± 21 months in the surgical group. RESULTS: Neurological improvement and progressive angular deformity occurred in both groups. The cost of recumbency in our patients was nearly half that of those who required surgery, though the length of hospitalization between the two groups was similar at 1 month ± 2 weeks. CONCLUSION: The above study emphasizes that the selection of operative versus nonoperative treatment in burst fractures should not be random but based on clinical as well as radiological criteria. Recumbency is favored in patients who are intact, with angular deformity less than 20°, a residual spinal canal greater than 50% of normal, and an anterior body height exceeding 50% of the posterior height. Surgical intervention is generally indicated in patients with partial neurological deficit, and those with severe instability.

KW - Spinal cord injury

KW - Spinal stabilization instrumentation

KW - Spinal trauma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032101399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032101399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0090-3019(97)00527-2

DO - 10.1016/S0090-3019(97)00527-2

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 619

EP - 627

JO - World Neurosurgery

JF - World Neurosurgery

SN - 1878-8750

IS - 6

ER -