Magnitude and spatial distribution of impact intensity under the foot relates to initial foot contact pattern

Bastiaan Breine, Philippe Malcolm, Veerle Segers, Joeri Gerlo, Rud Derie, Todd Pataky, Edward C. Frederick, Dirk De Clercq

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In running, foot contact patterns (rear-, mid-, or forefoot contact) influence impact intensity and initial ankle and foot kinematics. The aim of the study was to compare impact intensity and its spatial distribution under the foot between different foot contact patterns. Forty-nine subjects ran at 3.2 m·s-1 over a level runway while ground reaction forces (GRF) and shoe-surface pressures were recorded and foot contact pattern was determined. A 4-zone footmask (forefoot, midfoot, medial and lateral rearfoot) assessed the spatial distribution of the vertical GRF under the foot. We calculated peak vertical instantaneous loading rate of the GRF (VILR) per foot zone as the impact intensity measure. Midfoot contact patterns were shown to have the lowest, and atypical rearfoot contact patterns the highest impact intensities, respectively. The greatest local impact intensity was mainly situated under the rear- and midfoot for the typical rearfoot contact patterns, under the midfoot for the atypical rearfoot contact patterns, and under the mid- and forefoot for the midfoot contact patterns. These findings indicate that different foot contact patterns could benefit from cushioning in different shoe zones.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)431-436
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Applied Biomechanics
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Foot
Shoes
Biomechanical Phenomena
Ankle
Pressure

Keywords

  • Foot strike
  • Footwear
  • Force
  • Impact
  • Plantar pressure
  • Running

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Magnitude and spatial distribution of impact intensity under the foot relates to initial foot contact pattern. / Breine, Bastiaan; Malcolm, Philippe; Segers, Veerle; Gerlo, Joeri; Derie, Rud; Pataky, Todd; Frederick, Edward C.; De Clercq, Dirk.

In: Journal of Applied Biomechanics, Vol. 33, No. 6, 01.12.2017, p. 431-436.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Breine, Bastiaan ; Malcolm, Philippe ; Segers, Veerle ; Gerlo, Joeri ; Derie, Rud ; Pataky, Todd ; Frederick, Edward C. ; De Clercq, Dirk. / Magnitude and spatial distribution of impact intensity under the foot relates to initial foot contact pattern. In: Journal of Applied Biomechanics. 2017 ; Vol. 33, No. 6. pp. 431-436.
@article{55d50baa758445308827f144eeabe387,
title = "Magnitude and spatial distribution of impact intensity under the foot relates to initial foot contact pattern",
abstract = "In running, foot contact patterns (rear-, mid-, or forefoot contact) influence impact intensity and initial ankle and foot kinematics. The aim of the study was to compare impact intensity and its spatial distribution under the foot between different foot contact patterns. Forty-nine subjects ran at 3.2 m·s-1 over a level runway while ground reaction forces (GRF) and shoe-surface pressures were recorded and foot contact pattern was determined. A 4-zone footmask (forefoot, midfoot, medial and lateral rearfoot) assessed the spatial distribution of the vertical GRF under the foot. We calculated peak vertical instantaneous loading rate of the GRF (VILR) per foot zone as the impact intensity measure. Midfoot contact patterns were shown to have the lowest, and atypical rearfoot contact patterns the highest impact intensities, respectively. The greatest local impact intensity was mainly situated under the rear- and midfoot for the typical rearfoot contact patterns, under the midfoot for the atypical rearfoot contact patterns, and under the mid- and forefoot for the midfoot contact patterns. These findings indicate that different foot contact patterns could benefit from cushioning in different shoe zones.",
keywords = "Foot strike, Footwear, Force, Impact, Plantar pressure, Running",
author = "Bastiaan Breine and Philippe Malcolm and Veerle Segers and Joeri Gerlo and Rud Derie and Todd Pataky and Frederick, {Edward C.} and {De Clercq}, Dirk",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1123/jab.2016-0206",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "431--436",
journal = "Journal of Applied Biomechanics",
issn = "1065-8483",
publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Magnitude and spatial distribution of impact intensity under the foot relates to initial foot contact pattern

AU - Breine, Bastiaan

AU - Malcolm, Philippe

AU - Segers, Veerle

AU - Gerlo, Joeri

AU - Derie, Rud

AU - Pataky, Todd

AU - Frederick, Edward C.

AU - De Clercq, Dirk

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - In running, foot contact patterns (rear-, mid-, or forefoot contact) influence impact intensity and initial ankle and foot kinematics. The aim of the study was to compare impact intensity and its spatial distribution under the foot between different foot contact patterns. Forty-nine subjects ran at 3.2 m·s-1 over a level runway while ground reaction forces (GRF) and shoe-surface pressures were recorded and foot contact pattern was determined. A 4-zone footmask (forefoot, midfoot, medial and lateral rearfoot) assessed the spatial distribution of the vertical GRF under the foot. We calculated peak vertical instantaneous loading rate of the GRF (VILR) per foot zone as the impact intensity measure. Midfoot contact patterns were shown to have the lowest, and atypical rearfoot contact patterns the highest impact intensities, respectively. The greatest local impact intensity was mainly situated under the rear- and midfoot for the typical rearfoot contact patterns, under the midfoot for the atypical rearfoot contact patterns, and under the mid- and forefoot for the midfoot contact patterns. These findings indicate that different foot contact patterns could benefit from cushioning in different shoe zones.

AB - In running, foot contact patterns (rear-, mid-, or forefoot contact) influence impact intensity and initial ankle and foot kinematics. The aim of the study was to compare impact intensity and its spatial distribution under the foot between different foot contact patterns. Forty-nine subjects ran at 3.2 m·s-1 over a level runway while ground reaction forces (GRF) and shoe-surface pressures were recorded and foot contact pattern was determined. A 4-zone footmask (forefoot, midfoot, medial and lateral rearfoot) assessed the spatial distribution of the vertical GRF under the foot. We calculated peak vertical instantaneous loading rate of the GRF (VILR) per foot zone as the impact intensity measure. Midfoot contact patterns were shown to have the lowest, and atypical rearfoot contact patterns the highest impact intensities, respectively. The greatest local impact intensity was mainly situated under the rear- and midfoot for the typical rearfoot contact patterns, under the midfoot for the atypical rearfoot contact patterns, and under the mid- and forefoot for the midfoot contact patterns. These findings indicate that different foot contact patterns could benefit from cushioning in different shoe zones.

KW - Foot strike

KW - Footwear

KW - Force

KW - Impact

KW - Plantar pressure

KW - Running

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042716606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042716606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1123/jab.2016-0206

DO - 10.1123/jab.2016-0206

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 431

EP - 436

JO - Journal of Applied Biomechanics

JF - Journal of Applied Biomechanics

SN - 1065-8483

IS - 6

ER -