Low transcondylar fractures of the distal humerus: Results of open reduction and internal fixation

Juan P. Simone, Philipp N. Streubel, Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, Bernard F. Morrey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: This study presents the outcomes of low transcondylar fractures of the distal humerus treated by open reduction and internal fixation. Methods: Between 1996 and 2010, 263 distal humeral fractures were managed at our institution. Patients with a true low transcondylar fracture treated by open reduction and internal fixation were included. Fourteen patients form the basis of this study. Fracture fixation was achieved through a triceps-sparing approach, a triceps tongue, or an olecranon osteotomy. Internal fixation was performed with parallel plates, orthogonal plates, a single lateral plate, or a single medial plate. The clinical outcome was measured with pain levels, range of motion, and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. Radiographs at latest follow-up were assessed for union, delayed union, nonunion, and hardware failure. Results: At most recent follow-up, 11 patients had no pain, 2 had mild pain, and 1 had moderate pain. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 85. The mean arch of motion was 95°. Complications included nonunion, delayed union, wound complications, deep infection, and heterotopic ossification. Discussion: Stable internal fixation of low transcondylar fractures is perceived as difficult to achieve because of the very small size of the distal fragment. However, the results of our study indicate that internal fixation of low transcondylar fractures of the distal humerus is associated with a high union rate and satisfactory clinical results. Elbow arthroplasty does not need to be considered for most patients with a low transcondylar distal humeral fracture.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)573-578
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2014

Fingerprint

Humerus
Elbow
Humeral Fractures
Pain
Olecranon Process
Heterotopic Ossification
Fracture Fixation
Osteotomy
Articular Range of Motion
Tongue
Arthroplasty
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Wounds and Injuries
Infection

Keywords

  • Distal humeral fracture
  • Low transcondylar fracture
  • Open reduction and internal fixation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Low transcondylar fractures of the distal humerus : Results of open reduction and internal fixation. / Simone, Juan P.; Streubel, Philipp N.; Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin; Morrey, Bernard F.

In: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Vol. 23, No. 4, 04.2014, p. 573-578.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Simone, Juan P. ; Streubel, Philipp N. ; Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin ; Morrey, Bernard F. / Low transcondylar fractures of the distal humerus : Results of open reduction and internal fixation. In: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 23, No. 4. pp. 573-578.
@article{49345b57876a49c7aee6c2cfbc6b419a,
title = "Low transcondylar fractures of the distal humerus: Results of open reduction and internal fixation",
abstract = "Background: This study presents the outcomes of low transcondylar fractures of the distal humerus treated by open reduction and internal fixation. Methods: Between 1996 and 2010, 263 distal humeral fractures were managed at our institution. Patients with a true low transcondylar fracture treated by open reduction and internal fixation were included. Fourteen patients form the basis of this study. Fracture fixation was achieved through a triceps-sparing approach, a triceps tongue, or an olecranon osteotomy. Internal fixation was performed with parallel plates, orthogonal plates, a single lateral plate, or a single medial plate. The clinical outcome was measured with pain levels, range of motion, and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. Radiographs at latest follow-up were assessed for union, delayed union, nonunion, and hardware failure. Results: At most recent follow-up, 11 patients had no pain, 2 had mild pain, and 1 had moderate pain. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 85. The mean arch of motion was 95°. Complications included nonunion, delayed union, wound complications, deep infection, and heterotopic ossification. Discussion: Stable internal fixation of low transcondylar fractures is perceived as difficult to achieve because of the very small size of the distal fragment. However, the results of our study indicate that internal fixation of low transcondylar fractures of the distal humerus is associated with a high union rate and satisfactory clinical results. Elbow arthroplasty does not need to be considered for most patients with a low transcondylar distal humeral fracture.",
keywords = "Distal humeral fracture, Low transcondylar fracture, Open reduction and internal fixation",
author = "Simone, {Juan P.} and Streubel, {Philipp N.} and Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo and Morrey, {Bernard F.}",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.jse.2013.12.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "573--578",
journal = "Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery",
issn = "1058-2746",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Low transcondylar fractures of the distal humerus

T2 - Results of open reduction and internal fixation

AU - Simone, Juan P.

AU - Streubel, Philipp N.

AU - Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin

AU - Morrey, Bernard F.

PY - 2014/4

Y1 - 2014/4

N2 - Background: This study presents the outcomes of low transcondylar fractures of the distal humerus treated by open reduction and internal fixation. Methods: Between 1996 and 2010, 263 distal humeral fractures were managed at our institution. Patients with a true low transcondylar fracture treated by open reduction and internal fixation were included. Fourteen patients form the basis of this study. Fracture fixation was achieved through a triceps-sparing approach, a triceps tongue, or an olecranon osteotomy. Internal fixation was performed with parallel plates, orthogonal plates, a single lateral plate, or a single medial plate. The clinical outcome was measured with pain levels, range of motion, and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. Radiographs at latest follow-up were assessed for union, delayed union, nonunion, and hardware failure. Results: At most recent follow-up, 11 patients had no pain, 2 had mild pain, and 1 had moderate pain. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 85. The mean arch of motion was 95°. Complications included nonunion, delayed union, wound complications, deep infection, and heterotopic ossification. Discussion: Stable internal fixation of low transcondylar fractures is perceived as difficult to achieve because of the very small size of the distal fragment. However, the results of our study indicate that internal fixation of low transcondylar fractures of the distal humerus is associated with a high union rate and satisfactory clinical results. Elbow arthroplasty does not need to be considered for most patients with a low transcondylar distal humeral fracture.

AB - Background: This study presents the outcomes of low transcondylar fractures of the distal humerus treated by open reduction and internal fixation. Methods: Between 1996 and 2010, 263 distal humeral fractures were managed at our institution. Patients with a true low transcondylar fracture treated by open reduction and internal fixation were included. Fourteen patients form the basis of this study. Fracture fixation was achieved through a triceps-sparing approach, a triceps tongue, or an olecranon osteotomy. Internal fixation was performed with parallel plates, orthogonal plates, a single lateral plate, or a single medial plate. The clinical outcome was measured with pain levels, range of motion, and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. Radiographs at latest follow-up were assessed for union, delayed union, nonunion, and hardware failure. Results: At most recent follow-up, 11 patients had no pain, 2 had mild pain, and 1 had moderate pain. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 85. The mean arch of motion was 95°. Complications included nonunion, delayed union, wound complications, deep infection, and heterotopic ossification. Discussion: Stable internal fixation of low transcondylar fractures is perceived as difficult to achieve because of the very small size of the distal fragment. However, the results of our study indicate that internal fixation of low transcondylar fractures of the distal humerus is associated with a high union rate and satisfactory clinical results. Elbow arthroplasty does not need to be considered for most patients with a low transcondylar distal humeral fracture.

KW - Distal humeral fracture

KW - Low transcondylar fracture

KW - Open reduction and internal fixation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896877057&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896877057&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jse.2013.12.013

DO - 10.1016/j.jse.2013.12.013

M3 - Article

C2 - 24630549

AN - SCOPUS:84896877057

VL - 23

SP - 573

EP - 578

JO - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

JF - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

SN - 1058-2746

IS - 4

ER -