Low-frequency and high-frequency cochlear nonlinearity in humans

Michael P Gorga, Stephen T Neely, Darcia M. Dierking, Judy Kopun, Kristin Jolkowski, Kristin Groenenboom, Hongyang Tan, Bettina Stiegemann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Low- and high-frequency cochlear nonlinearity was studied by measuring distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output (DPOAE I/O) functions at 0.5 and 4 kHz in 103 normal-hearing subjects. Behavioral thresholds at both f2's were used to set L2 in dB SL for each subject. Primary levels were optimized by determining the L1 resulting in the largest Ldp for each L2 for each subject and both f 2's. DPOAE I/O functions were measured using L2 inputs from -10 dB SL (0.5 kHz) or -20 dB SL (4 kHz) to 65 dB SL (both frequencies). Mean DPOAE I/O functions, averaged across subjects, differed between the two frequencies, even when threshold was taken into account. The slopes of the I/O functions were similar at 0.5 and 4 kHz for high-level inputs, with maximum compression ratios of about 4:1. At both frequencies, the maximum slope near DPOAE threshold was approximately 1, which occurred at lower levels at 4 kHz, compared to 0.5 kHz. These results suggest that there is a wider dynamic range and perhaps greater cochlear-amplifier gain at 4 kHz, compared to 0.5 kHz. Caution is indicated, however, because of uncertainties in the interpretation of slope and because the confounding influence of differences in noise level could not be completely controlled.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1671-1680
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume122
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 17 2007

Fingerprint

nonlinearity
low frequencies
slopes
thresholds
output
products
compression ratio
hearing
dynamic range
amplifiers
Nonlinearity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Gorga, M. P., Neely, S. T., Dierking, D. M., Kopun, J., Jolkowski, K., Groenenboom, K., ... Stiegemann, B. (2007). Low-frequency and high-frequency cochlear nonlinearity in humans. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122(3), 1671-1680. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2751265

Low-frequency and high-frequency cochlear nonlinearity in humans. / Gorga, Michael P; Neely, Stephen T; Dierking, Darcia M.; Kopun, Judy; Jolkowski, Kristin; Groenenboom, Kristin; Tan, Hongyang; Stiegemann, Bettina.

In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 122, No. 3, 17.10.2007, p. 1671-1680.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gorga, MP, Neely, ST, Dierking, DM, Kopun, J, Jolkowski, K, Groenenboom, K, Tan, H & Stiegemann, B 2007, 'Low-frequency and high-frequency cochlear nonlinearity in humans', Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 1671-1680. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2751265
Gorga, Michael P ; Neely, Stephen T ; Dierking, Darcia M. ; Kopun, Judy ; Jolkowski, Kristin ; Groenenboom, Kristin ; Tan, Hongyang ; Stiegemann, Bettina. / Low-frequency and high-frequency cochlear nonlinearity in humans. In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2007 ; Vol. 122, No. 3. pp. 1671-1680.
@article{820a7c521cd34f9bb0995b3549fc37c7,
title = "Low-frequency and high-frequency cochlear nonlinearity in humans",
abstract = "Low- and high-frequency cochlear nonlinearity was studied by measuring distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output (DPOAE I/O) functions at 0.5 and 4 kHz in 103 normal-hearing subjects. Behavioral thresholds at both f2's were used to set L2 in dB SL for each subject. Primary levels were optimized by determining the L1 resulting in the largest Ldp for each L2 for each subject and both f 2's. DPOAE I/O functions were measured using L2 inputs from -10 dB SL (0.5 kHz) or -20 dB SL (4 kHz) to 65 dB SL (both frequencies). Mean DPOAE I/O functions, averaged across subjects, differed between the two frequencies, even when threshold was taken into account. The slopes of the I/O functions were similar at 0.5 and 4 kHz for high-level inputs, with maximum compression ratios of about 4:1. At both frequencies, the maximum slope near DPOAE threshold was approximately 1, which occurred at lower levels at 4 kHz, compared to 0.5 kHz. These results suggest that there is a wider dynamic range and perhaps greater cochlear-amplifier gain at 4 kHz, compared to 0.5 kHz. Caution is indicated, however, because of uncertainties in the interpretation of slope and because the confounding influence of differences in noise level could not be completely controlled.",
author = "Gorga, {Michael P} and Neely, {Stephen T} and Dierking, {Darcia M.} and Judy Kopun and Kristin Jolkowski and Kristin Groenenboom and Hongyang Tan and Bettina Stiegemann",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1121/1.2751265",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "122",
pages = "1671--1680",
journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",
issn = "0001-4966",
publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Low-frequency and high-frequency cochlear nonlinearity in humans

AU - Gorga, Michael P

AU - Neely, Stephen T

AU - Dierking, Darcia M.

AU - Kopun, Judy

AU - Jolkowski, Kristin

AU - Groenenboom, Kristin

AU - Tan, Hongyang

AU - Stiegemann, Bettina

PY - 2007/10/17

Y1 - 2007/10/17

N2 - Low- and high-frequency cochlear nonlinearity was studied by measuring distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output (DPOAE I/O) functions at 0.5 and 4 kHz in 103 normal-hearing subjects. Behavioral thresholds at both f2's were used to set L2 in dB SL for each subject. Primary levels were optimized by determining the L1 resulting in the largest Ldp for each L2 for each subject and both f 2's. DPOAE I/O functions were measured using L2 inputs from -10 dB SL (0.5 kHz) or -20 dB SL (4 kHz) to 65 dB SL (both frequencies). Mean DPOAE I/O functions, averaged across subjects, differed between the two frequencies, even when threshold was taken into account. The slopes of the I/O functions were similar at 0.5 and 4 kHz for high-level inputs, with maximum compression ratios of about 4:1. At both frequencies, the maximum slope near DPOAE threshold was approximately 1, which occurred at lower levels at 4 kHz, compared to 0.5 kHz. These results suggest that there is a wider dynamic range and perhaps greater cochlear-amplifier gain at 4 kHz, compared to 0.5 kHz. Caution is indicated, however, because of uncertainties in the interpretation of slope and because the confounding influence of differences in noise level could not be completely controlled.

AB - Low- and high-frequency cochlear nonlinearity was studied by measuring distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output (DPOAE I/O) functions at 0.5 and 4 kHz in 103 normal-hearing subjects. Behavioral thresholds at both f2's were used to set L2 in dB SL for each subject. Primary levels were optimized by determining the L1 resulting in the largest Ldp for each L2 for each subject and both f 2's. DPOAE I/O functions were measured using L2 inputs from -10 dB SL (0.5 kHz) or -20 dB SL (4 kHz) to 65 dB SL (both frequencies). Mean DPOAE I/O functions, averaged across subjects, differed between the two frequencies, even when threshold was taken into account. The slopes of the I/O functions were similar at 0.5 and 4 kHz for high-level inputs, with maximum compression ratios of about 4:1. At both frequencies, the maximum slope near DPOAE threshold was approximately 1, which occurred at lower levels at 4 kHz, compared to 0.5 kHz. These results suggest that there is a wider dynamic range and perhaps greater cochlear-amplifier gain at 4 kHz, compared to 0.5 kHz. Caution is indicated, however, because of uncertainties in the interpretation of slope and because the confounding influence of differences in noise level could not be completely controlled.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35248827011&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35248827011&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/1.2751265

DO - 10.1121/1.2751265

M3 - Article

C2 - 17927427

AN - SCOPUS:35248827011

VL - 122

SP - 1671

EP - 1680

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

SN - 0001-4966

IS - 3

ER -