Longitudinal predictors of aided speech audibility in infants and children

Ryan W McCreery, Elizabeth A. Walker, Meredith Spratford, Ruth Bentler, Lenore Holte, Patricia Roush, Jacob Oleson, John Van Buren, Mary Pat Moeller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Amplification is a core component of early intervention for children who are hard of hearing, but hearing aids (HAs) have unique effects that may be independent from other components of the early intervention process, such as caregiver training or speech and language intervention. The specific effects of amplification are rarely described in studies of developmental outcomes. The primary purpose of this article is to quantify aided speech audibility during the early childhood years and examine the factors that influence audibility with amplification for children in the Outcomes of Children with Hearing Loss study. Design: Participants were 288 children with permanent hearing loss who were followed as part of the Outcomes of Children with Hearing Loss study. All of the children in this analysis had bilateral hearing loss and wore air-conduction behind-the-ear HAs. At every study visit, hearing thresholds were measured using developmentally appropriate behavioral methods. Data were obtained for a total of 1043 audiometric evaluations across all subjects for the first four study visits. In addition, the aided audibility of speech through the HA was assessed using probe microphone measures. Hearing thresholds and aided audibility were analyzed. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were conducted to determine whether patterns of thresholds and aided audibility were significantly different between ears (left versus right) or across the first four study visits. Furthermore, a cluster analysis was performed based on the aided audibility at entry into the study, aided audibility at the child's final visit, and change in aided audibility between these two intervals to determine whether there were different patterns of longitudinal aided audibility within the sample. Results: Eighty-four percent of children in the study had stable audiometric thresholds during the study, defined as threshold changes <10 dB for any single study visit. There were no significant differences in hearing thresholds, aided audibility, or deviation of the HA fitting from prescriptive targets between ears or across test intervals for the first four visits. Approximately 35% of the children in the study had aided audibility that was below the average for the normative range for the Speech Intelligibility Index based on degree of hearing loss. The cluster analysis of longitudinal aided audibility revealed three distinct groups of children: a group with consistently high aided audibility throughout the study, a group with decreasing audibility during the study, and a group with consistently low aided audibility. Conclusions: The current results indicated that approximately 65% of children in the study had adequate aided audibility of speech and stable hearing during the study period. Limited audibility was associated with greater degrees of hearing loss and larger deviations from prescriptive targets. Studies of developmental outcomes will help to determine how aided audibility is necessary to affect developmental outcomes in children who are hard of hearing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)24S-37S
JournalEar and hearing
Volume36
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015

Fingerprint

Hearing
Hearing Loss
Hearing Aids
Ear
Cluster Analysis
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Bilateral Hearing Loss
Speech Intelligibility
Caregivers
Analysis of Variance
Language
Air

Keywords

  • Amplification
  • Audibility
  • Children
  • Hearing aids
  • Hearing loss
  • Speech intelligibility index

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Longitudinal predictors of aided speech audibility in infants and children. / McCreery, Ryan W; Walker, Elizabeth A.; Spratford, Meredith; Bentler, Ruth; Holte, Lenore; Roush, Patricia; Oleson, Jacob; Van Buren, John; Moeller, Mary Pat.

In: Ear and hearing, Vol. 36, 01.11.2015, p. 24S-37S.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McCreery, Ryan W ; Walker, Elizabeth A. ; Spratford, Meredith ; Bentler, Ruth ; Holte, Lenore ; Roush, Patricia ; Oleson, Jacob ; Van Buren, John ; Moeller, Mary Pat. / Longitudinal predictors of aided speech audibility in infants and children. In: Ear and hearing. 2015 ; Vol. 36. pp. 24S-37S.
@article{1836a32ba58c4369bc0e84eec3dd6e1e,
title = "Longitudinal predictors of aided speech audibility in infants and children",
abstract = "Objectives: Amplification is a core component of early intervention for children who are hard of hearing, but hearing aids (HAs) have unique effects that may be independent from other components of the early intervention process, such as caregiver training or speech and language intervention. The specific effects of amplification are rarely described in studies of developmental outcomes. The primary purpose of this article is to quantify aided speech audibility during the early childhood years and examine the factors that influence audibility with amplification for children in the Outcomes of Children with Hearing Loss study. Design: Participants were 288 children with permanent hearing loss who were followed as part of the Outcomes of Children with Hearing Loss study. All of the children in this analysis had bilateral hearing loss and wore air-conduction behind-the-ear HAs. At every study visit, hearing thresholds were measured using developmentally appropriate behavioral methods. Data were obtained for a total of 1043 audiometric evaluations across all subjects for the first four study visits. In addition, the aided audibility of speech through the HA was assessed using probe microphone measures. Hearing thresholds and aided audibility were analyzed. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were conducted to determine whether patterns of thresholds and aided audibility were significantly different between ears (left versus right) or across the first four study visits. Furthermore, a cluster analysis was performed based on the aided audibility at entry into the study, aided audibility at the child's final visit, and change in aided audibility between these two intervals to determine whether there were different patterns of longitudinal aided audibility within the sample. Results: Eighty-four percent of children in the study had stable audiometric thresholds during the study, defined as threshold changes <10 dB for any single study visit. There were no significant differences in hearing thresholds, aided audibility, or deviation of the HA fitting from prescriptive targets between ears or across test intervals for the first four visits. Approximately 35{\%} of the children in the study had aided audibility that was below the average for the normative range for the Speech Intelligibility Index based on degree of hearing loss. The cluster analysis of longitudinal aided audibility revealed three distinct groups of children: a group with consistently high aided audibility throughout the study, a group with decreasing audibility during the study, and a group with consistently low aided audibility. Conclusions: The current results indicated that approximately 65{\%} of children in the study had adequate aided audibility of speech and stable hearing during the study period. Limited audibility was associated with greater degrees of hearing loss and larger deviations from prescriptive targets. Studies of developmental outcomes will help to determine how aided audibility is necessary to affect developmental outcomes in children who are hard of hearing.",
keywords = "Amplification, Audibility, Children, Hearing aids, Hearing loss, Speech intelligibility index",
author = "McCreery, {Ryan W} and Walker, {Elizabeth A.} and Meredith Spratford and Ruth Bentler and Lenore Holte and Patricia Roush and Jacob Oleson and {Van Buren}, John and Moeller, {Mary Pat}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/AUD.0000000000000211",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "24S--37S",
journal = "Ear and Hearing",
issn = "0196-0202",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Longitudinal predictors of aided speech audibility in infants and children

AU - McCreery, Ryan W

AU - Walker, Elizabeth A.

AU - Spratford, Meredith

AU - Bentler, Ruth

AU - Holte, Lenore

AU - Roush, Patricia

AU - Oleson, Jacob

AU - Van Buren, John

AU - Moeller, Mary Pat

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - Objectives: Amplification is a core component of early intervention for children who are hard of hearing, but hearing aids (HAs) have unique effects that may be independent from other components of the early intervention process, such as caregiver training or speech and language intervention. The specific effects of amplification are rarely described in studies of developmental outcomes. The primary purpose of this article is to quantify aided speech audibility during the early childhood years and examine the factors that influence audibility with amplification for children in the Outcomes of Children with Hearing Loss study. Design: Participants were 288 children with permanent hearing loss who were followed as part of the Outcomes of Children with Hearing Loss study. All of the children in this analysis had bilateral hearing loss and wore air-conduction behind-the-ear HAs. At every study visit, hearing thresholds were measured using developmentally appropriate behavioral methods. Data were obtained for a total of 1043 audiometric evaluations across all subjects for the first four study visits. In addition, the aided audibility of speech through the HA was assessed using probe microphone measures. Hearing thresholds and aided audibility were analyzed. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were conducted to determine whether patterns of thresholds and aided audibility were significantly different between ears (left versus right) or across the first four study visits. Furthermore, a cluster analysis was performed based on the aided audibility at entry into the study, aided audibility at the child's final visit, and change in aided audibility between these two intervals to determine whether there were different patterns of longitudinal aided audibility within the sample. Results: Eighty-four percent of children in the study had stable audiometric thresholds during the study, defined as threshold changes <10 dB for any single study visit. There were no significant differences in hearing thresholds, aided audibility, or deviation of the HA fitting from prescriptive targets between ears or across test intervals for the first four visits. Approximately 35% of the children in the study had aided audibility that was below the average for the normative range for the Speech Intelligibility Index based on degree of hearing loss. The cluster analysis of longitudinal aided audibility revealed three distinct groups of children: a group with consistently high aided audibility throughout the study, a group with decreasing audibility during the study, and a group with consistently low aided audibility. Conclusions: The current results indicated that approximately 65% of children in the study had adequate aided audibility of speech and stable hearing during the study period. Limited audibility was associated with greater degrees of hearing loss and larger deviations from prescriptive targets. Studies of developmental outcomes will help to determine how aided audibility is necessary to affect developmental outcomes in children who are hard of hearing.

AB - Objectives: Amplification is a core component of early intervention for children who are hard of hearing, but hearing aids (HAs) have unique effects that may be independent from other components of the early intervention process, such as caregiver training or speech and language intervention. The specific effects of amplification are rarely described in studies of developmental outcomes. The primary purpose of this article is to quantify aided speech audibility during the early childhood years and examine the factors that influence audibility with amplification for children in the Outcomes of Children with Hearing Loss study. Design: Participants were 288 children with permanent hearing loss who were followed as part of the Outcomes of Children with Hearing Loss study. All of the children in this analysis had bilateral hearing loss and wore air-conduction behind-the-ear HAs. At every study visit, hearing thresholds were measured using developmentally appropriate behavioral methods. Data were obtained for a total of 1043 audiometric evaluations across all subjects for the first four study visits. In addition, the aided audibility of speech through the HA was assessed using probe microphone measures. Hearing thresholds and aided audibility were analyzed. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were conducted to determine whether patterns of thresholds and aided audibility were significantly different between ears (left versus right) or across the first four study visits. Furthermore, a cluster analysis was performed based on the aided audibility at entry into the study, aided audibility at the child's final visit, and change in aided audibility between these two intervals to determine whether there were different patterns of longitudinal aided audibility within the sample. Results: Eighty-four percent of children in the study had stable audiometric thresholds during the study, defined as threshold changes <10 dB for any single study visit. There were no significant differences in hearing thresholds, aided audibility, or deviation of the HA fitting from prescriptive targets between ears or across test intervals for the first four visits. Approximately 35% of the children in the study had aided audibility that was below the average for the normative range for the Speech Intelligibility Index based on degree of hearing loss. The cluster analysis of longitudinal aided audibility revealed three distinct groups of children: a group with consistently high aided audibility throughout the study, a group with decreasing audibility during the study, and a group with consistently low aided audibility. Conclusions: The current results indicated that approximately 65% of children in the study had adequate aided audibility of speech and stable hearing during the study period. Limited audibility was associated with greater degrees of hearing loss and larger deviations from prescriptive targets. Studies of developmental outcomes will help to determine how aided audibility is necessary to affect developmental outcomes in children who are hard of hearing.

KW - Amplification

KW - Audibility

KW - Children

KW - Hearing aids

KW - Hearing loss

KW - Speech intelligibility index

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988625065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988625065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000211

DO - 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000211

M3 - Article

C2 - 26731156

AN - SCOPUS:84988625065

VL - 36

SP - 24S-37S

JO - Ear and Hearing

JF - Ear and Hearing

SN - 0196-0202

ER -