Longitudinal field comparison of the RT3 and an activity diary with cardiac patients

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigated reliability and validity of two methods of measuring patients' physical activity following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Sixty-five patients wore an RT3 accelerometer and recorded activity in a diary at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months postsurgery. Generalizability coefficients greater than .80 required approximately 2 to 4 days of data, fewer than reported elsewhere. Energy expenditure estimates correlated .77, .72, and .57 (p < .01), with mean RT3 estimates higher, especially when overall energy expenditure was low. Changes from 3 to 6 weeks correlated only moderately (r = .37-.46) across methods. The methods produce reliable but differing estimates of physical activity in this population. Although no method bias is evident in assessing change over time, correlations support the importance of using multiple methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)105-120
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of nursing measurement
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

Fingerprint

Energy Metabolism
Exercise
Reproducibility of Results
Coronary Artery Bypass
Transplants
Population

Keywords

  • Accelerometer
  • Physical activity
  • Reliability
  • Self-report

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

@article{2ddd5894bc5f4a7ba6bd02805a6a567a,
title = "Longitudinal field comparison of the RT3 and an activity diary with cardiac patients",
abstract = "This study investigated reliability and validity of two methods of measuring patients' physical activity following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Sixty-five patients wore an RT3 accelerometer and recorded activity in a diary at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months postsurgery. Generalizability coefficients greater than .80 required approximately 2 to 4 days of data, fewer than reported elsewhere. Energy expenditure estimates correlated .77, .72, and .57 (p < .01), with mean RT3 estimates higher, especially when overall energy expenditure was low. Changes from 3 to 6 weeks correlated only moderately (r = .37-.46) across methods. The methods produce reliable but differing estimates of physical activity in this population. Although no method bias is evident in assessing change over time, correlations support the importance of using multiple methods.",
keywords = "Accelerometer, Physical activity, Reliability, Self-report",
author = "Hertzog, {Melody A.} and Nieveen, {Janet Louise} and Zimmerman, {Lani M} and Barnason, {Susan Ann} and Schulz, {Paula Sue} and Miller, {Connie L} and Rasmussen, {Doris A.}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1891/106137407782156363",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "105--120",
journal = "Journal of Nursing Measurement",
issn = "1061-3749",
publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Longitudinal field comparison of the RT3 and an activity diary with cardiac patients

AU - Hertzog, Melody A.

AU - Nieveen, Janet Louise

AU - Zimmerman, Lani M

AU - Barnason, Susan Ann

AU - Schulz, Paula Sue

AU - Miller, Connie L

AU - Rasmussen, Doris A.

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - This study investigated reliability and validity of two methods of measuring patients' physical activity following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Sixty-five patients wore an RT3 accelerometer and recorded activity in a diary at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months postsurgery. Generalizability coefficients greater than .80 required approximately 2 to 4 days of data, fewer than reported elsewhere. Energy expenditure estimates correlated .77, .72, and .57 (p < .01), with mean RT3 estimates higher, especially when overall energy expenditure was low. Changes from 3 to 6 weeks correlated only moderately (r = .37-.46) across methods. The methods produce reliable but differing estimates of physical activity in this population. Although no method bias is evident in assessing change over time, correlations support the importance of using multiple methods.

AB - This study investigated reliability and validity of two methods of measuring patients' physical activity following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Sixty-five patients wore an RT3 accelerometer and recorded activity in a diary at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months postsurgery. Generalizability coefficients greater than .80 required approximately 2 to 4 days of data, fewer than reported elsewhere. Energy expenditure estimates correlated .77, .72, and .57 (p < .01), with mean RT3 estimates higher, especially when overall energy expenditure was low. Changes from 3 to 6 weeks correlated only moderately (r = .37-.46) across methods. The methods produce reliable but differing estimates of physical activity in this population. Although no method bias is evident in assessing change over time, correlations support the importance of using multiple methods.

KW - Accelerometer

KW - Physical activity

KW - Reliability

KW - Self-report

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35948977717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35948977717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1891/106137407782156363

DO - 10.1891/106137407782156363

M3 - Article

C2 - 18020168

AN - SCOPUS:35948977717

VL - 15

SP - 105

EP - 120

JO - Journal of Nursing Measurement

JF - Journal of Nursing Measurement

SN - 1061-3749

IS - 2

ER -