Long-term quality of life for surgical and nonsurgical treatment of head and neck cancer

Mark El-Deiry, Gerry F. Funk, Sarvi Nalwa, Lucy H. Karnell, Russell B Smith, John M. Buatti, Henry T. Hoffman, Gerry H. Clamon, Scott M. Graham, Douglas K. Trask, Kenneth J. Dornfeld, Min Yao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

74 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare the long-term, health-related quality-of-life outcomes in patients with advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) treated with surgery and postoperative radiation therapy (SRT) or concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CRT). Design: Matched-pair study comparing patients with advanced HNC treated with SRT or CRT at least 12 months after treatment. Patients completed 2 validated surveys addressing HNC-specific outcomes and depressive symptoms and provided information on employment and tobacco and alcohol use. Results for the 2 groups were compared using paired-sample t test and χ2 analysis. Setting: University-based study. Patients: Patients with stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx who underwent SRT or received CRT. Main Outcome Measures: Head and neck cancer- specific health-related quality of life from the Head and Neck Cancer Inventory and level of depressive symptoms from the Beck Depression Inventory. Results: The matching process resulted in 27 patients in each treatment group. The HNC-specific domain scores (with higher scores representing better outcomes) for CRT vs SRT were eating, 37.8 vs 40.8 (P=.69); speech, 65.1 vs 56.0 (P=.23); aesthetics, 80.3 vs 69.2 (P=.14); and social disruption, 69.7 vs 70.6 (P=.90). Overall health-related quality of life was 64.0 with SRT and 55.0 with CRT (P=.142). For the Beck Depression Inventory (with higher scores representing worse outcomes), patients who underwent SRT had a mean score of 9.6 compared with 11.6 for patients who received CRT (P=.42). Conclusion: As nonsurgical means of treating HNC have become more aggressive and surgical techniques have become more focused on function preservation and rehabilitation, the overall health-related quality of life resulting from these different approaches is similar.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)879-885
Number of pages7
JournalArchives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume131
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2005

Fingerprint

Head and Neck Neoplasms
Radiotherapy
Quality of Life
Drug Therapy
Therapeutics
Depression
Equipment and Supplies
Hypopharynx
Oropharynx
Tobacco Use
Larynx
Esthetics
Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Rehabilitation
Eating
Alcohols
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

El-Deiry, M., Funk, G. F., Nalwa, S., Karnell, L. H., Smith, R. B., Buatti, J. M., ... Yao, M. (2005). Long-term quality of life for surgical and nonsurgical treatment of head and neck cancer. Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 131(10), 879-885. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.131.10.879

Long-term quality of life for surgical and nonsurgical treatment of head and neck cancer. / El-Deiry, Mark; Funk, Gerry F.; Nalwa, Sarvi; Karnell, Lucy H.; Smith, Russell B; Buatti, John M.; Hoffman, Henry T.; Clamon, Gerry H.; Graham, Scott M.; Trask, Douglas K.; Dornfeld, Kenneth J.; Yao, Min.

In: Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 131, No. 10, 01.10.2005, p. 879-885.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

El-Deiry, M, Funk, GF, Nalwa, S, Karnell, LH, Smith, RB, Buatti, JM, Hoffman, HT, Clamon, GH, Graham, SM, Trask, DK, Dornfeld, KJ & Yao, M 2005, 'Long-term quality of life for surgical and nonsurgical treatment of head and neck cancer', Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 131, no. 10, pp. 879-885. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.131.10.879
El-Deiry, Mark ; Funk, Gerry F. ; Nalwa, Sarvi ; Karnell, Lucy H. ; Smith, Russell B ; Buatti, John M. ; Hoffman, Henry T. ; Clamon, Gerry H. ; Graham, Scott M. ; Trask, Douglas K. ; Dornfeld, Kenneth J. ; Yao, Min. / Long-term quality of life for surgical and nonsurgical treatment of head and neck cancer. In: Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2005 ; Vol. 131, No. 10. pp. 879-885.
@article{305e284421494965a9da8abb6d56383b,
title = "Long-term quality of life for surgical and nonsurgical treatment of head and neck cancer",
abstract = "Objective: To compare the long-term, health-related quality-of-life outcomes in patients with advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) treated with surgery and postoperative radiation therapy (SRT) or concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CRT). Design: Matched-pair study comparing patients with advanced HNC treated with SRT or CRT at least 12 months after treatment. Patients completed 2 validated surveys addressing HNC-specific outcomes and depressive symptoms and provided information on employment and tobacco and alcohol use. Results for the 2 groups were compared using paired-sample t test and χ2 analysis. Setting: University-based study. Patients: Patients with stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx who underwent SRT or received CRT. Main Outcome Measures: Head and neck cancer- specific health-related quality of life from the Head and Neck Cancer Inventory and level of depressive symptoms from the Beck Depression Inventory. Results: The matching process resulted in 27 patients in each treatment group. The HNC-specific domain scores (with higher scores representing better outcomes) for CRT vs SRT were eating, 37.8 vs 40.8 (P=.69); speech, 65.1 vs 56.0 (P=.23); aesthetics, 80.3 vs 69.2 (P=.14); and social disruption, 69.7 vs 70.6 (P=.90). Overall health-related quality of life was 64.0 with SRT and 55.0 with CRT (P=.142). For the Beck Depression Inventory (with higher scores representing worse outcomes), patients who underwent SRT had a mean score of 9.6 compared with 11.6 for patients who received CRT (P=.42). Conclusion: As nonsurgical means of treating HNC have become more aggressive and surgical techniques have become more focused on function preservation and rehabilitation, the overall health-related quality of life resulting from these different approaches is similar.",
author = "Mark El-Deiry and Funk, {Gerry F.} and Sarvi Nalwa and Karnell, {Lucy H.} and Smith, {Russell B} and Buatti, {John M.} and Hoffman, {Henry T.} and Clamon, {Gerry H.} and Graham, {Scott M.} and Trask, {Douglas K.} and Dornfeld, {Kenneth J.} and Min Yao",
year = "2005",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/archotol.131.10.879",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "131",
pages = "879--885",
journal = "JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery",
issn = "2168-6181",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Long-term quality of life for surgical and nonsurgical treatment of head and neck cancer

AU - El-Deiry, Mark

AU - Funk, Gerry F.

AU - Nalwa, Sarvi

AU - Karnell, Lucy H.

AU - Smith, Russell B

AU - Buatti, John M.

AU - Hoffman, Henry T.

AU - Clamon, Gerry H.

AU - Graham, Scott M.

AU - Trask, Douglas K.

AU - Dornfeld, Kenneth J.

AU - Yao, Min

PY - 2005/10/1

Y1 - 2005/10/1

N2 - Objective: To compare the long-term, health-related quality-of-life outcomes in patients with advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) treated with surgery and postoperative radiation therapy (SRT) or concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CRT). Design: Matched-pair study comparing patients with advanced HNC treated with SRT or CRT at least 12 months after treatment. Patients completed 2 validated surveys addressing HNC-specific outcomes and depressive symptoms and provided information on employment and tobacco and alcohol use. Results for the 2 groups were compared using paired-sample t test and χ2 analysis. Setting: University-based study. Patients: Patients with stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx who underwent SRT or received CRT. Main Outcome Measures: Head and neck cancer- specific health-related quality of life from the Head and Neck Cancer Inventory and level of depressive symptoms from the Beck Depression Inventory. Results: The matching process resulted in 27 patients in each treatment group. The HNC-specific domain scores (with higher scores representing better outcomes) for CRT vs SRT were eating, 37.8 vs 40.8 (P=.69); speech, 65.1 vs 56.0 (P=.23); aesthetics, 80.3 vs 69.2 (P=.14); and social disruption, 69.7 vs 70.6 (P=.90). Overall health-related quality of life was 64.0 with SRT and 55.0 with CRT (P=.142). For the Beck Depression Inventory (with higher scores representing worse outcomes), patients who underwent SRT had a mean score of 9.6 compared with 11.6 for patients who received CRT (P=.42). Conclusion: As nonsurgical means of treating HNC have become more aggressive and surgical techniques have become more focused on function preservation and rehabilitation, the overall health-related quality of life resulting from these different approaches is similar.

AB - Objective: To compare the long-term, health-related quality-of-life outcomes in patients with advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) treated with surgery and postoperative radiation therapy (SRT) or concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CRT). Design: Matched-pair study comparing patients with advanced HNC treated with SRT or CRT at least 12 months after treatment. Patients completed 2 validated surveys addressing HNC-specific outcomes and depressive symptoms and provided information on employment and tobacco and alcohol use. Results for the 2 groups were compared using paired-sample t test and χ2 analysis. Setting: University-based study. Patients: Patients with stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx who underwent SRT or received CRT. Main Outcome Measures: Head and neck cancer- specific health-related quality of life from the Head and Neck Cancer Inventory and level of depressive symptoms from the Beck Depression Inventory. Results: The matching process resulted in 27 patients in each treatment group. The HNC-specific domain scores (with higher scores representing better outcomes) for CRT vs SRT were eating, 37.8 vs 40.8 (P=.69); speech, 65.1 vs 56.0 (P=.23); aesthetics, 80.3 vs 69.2 (P=.14); and social disruption, 69.7 vs 70.6 (P=.90). Overall health-related quality of life was 64.0 with SRT and 55.0 with CRT (P=.142). For the Beck Depression Inventory (with higher scores representing worse outcomes), patients who underwent SRT had a mean score of 9.6 compared with 11.6 for patients who received CRT (P=.42). Conclusion: As nonsurgical means of treating HNC have become more aggressive and surgical techniques have become more focused on function preservation and rehabilitation, the overall health-related quality of life resulting from these different approaches is similar.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=26844519610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=26844519610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archotol.131.10.879

DO - 10.1001/archotol.131.10.879

M3 - Article

VL - 131

SP - 879

EP - 885

JO - JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

JF - JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

SN - 2168-6181

IS - 10

ER -