Long-term patterns of fruit production in five forest types of the South Carolina upper coastal plain

Cathryn H. Greenberg, Douglas J. Levey, Charles Kwit, John P McCarty, Scott F. Pearson, Sarah Sargent, John Kilgo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fleshy fruit is a key food resource for many vertebrates and may be particularly important energy source to birds during fall migration and winter. Hence, land managers should know how fruit availability varies among forest types, seasons, and years. We quantified fleshy fruit abundance monthly for 9 years (1995-2003) in 56 0.1-ha plots in 5 forest types of South Carolina's upper Coastal Plain, USA. Forest types were mature upland hardwood and bottomland hardwood forest, mature closed-canopy loblolly (Pinus taeda) and longleaf pine (P. palustris) plantation, and recent clearcut regeneration harvests planted with longleaf pine seedlings. Mean annual number of fruits and dry fruit pulp mass were highest in regeneration harvests (264,592 ± 37,444 fruits; 12,009 ± 2,392 g/ha), upland hardwoods (60,769 ± 7,667 fruits; 5,079 ± 529 g/ha), and bottomland hardwoods (65,614 ± 8,351 fruits; 4,621 ± 677 g/ha), and lowest in longleaf pine (44,104 ± 8,301 fruits; 4,102 ± 877 g/ha) and loblolly (39,532 ± 5,034 fruits; 3,261 ± 492 g/ha) plantations. Fruit production was initially high in regeneration harvests and declined with stand development and canopy closure (1995-2003). Fruit availability was highest June-September and lowest in April. More species of fruit-producing plants occurred in upland hardwoods, bottomland hardwoods, and regeneration harvests than in loblolly and longleaf pine plantations. Several species produced fruit only in 1 or 2 forest types. In sum, fruit availability varied temporally and spatially because of differences in species composition among forest types and age classes, patchy distributions of fruiting plants both within and among forest types, fruiting phenology, high inter-annual variation in fruit crop size by some dominant fruit-producing species, and the dynamic process of disturbance-adapted species colonization and decline, or recovery in recently harvested stands. Land managers could enhance fruit availability for wildlife by creating and maintaining diverse forest types and age classes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1036-1046
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Wildlife Management
Volume76
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2012

Fingerprint

fruit production
coastal plains
forest types
coastal plain
fruiting
fruit
fruits
hardwood
Pinus
regeneration
highlands
plantations
plantation
age structure
age class
lowlands
managers
canopy
Pinus palustris
fruit pulp

Keywords

  • Coastal Plain forest
  • Savannah River Site
  • bottomland hardwoods
  • clearcut regeneration
  • fruit
  • pine plantation
  • soft mast
  • timber harvest
  • upland hardwoods
  • wildlife food

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Long-term patterns of fruit production in five forest types of the South Carolina upper coastal plain. / Greenberg, Cathryn H.; Levey, Douglas J.; Kwit, Charles; McCarty, John P; Pearson, Scott F.; Sargent, Sarah; Kilgo, John.

In: Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 76, No. 5, 01.07.2012, p. 1036-1046.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Greenberg, Cathryn H. ; Levey, Douglas J. ; Kwit, Charles ; McCarty, John P ; Pearson, Scott F. ; Sargent, Sarah ; Kilgo, John. / Long-term patterns of fruit production in five forest types of the South Carolina upper coastal plain. In: Journal of Wildlife Management. 2012 ; Vol. 76, No. 5. pp. 1036-1046.
@article{8f61e7b2015f41048e439631588eae26,
title = "Long-term patterns of fruit production in five forest types of the South Carolina upper coastal plain",
abstract = "Fleshy fruit is a key food resource for many vertebrates and may be particularly important energy source to birds during fall migration and winter. Hence, land managers should know how fruit availability varies among forest types, seasons, and years. We quantified fleshy fruit abundance monthly for 9 years (1995-2003) in 56 0.1-ha plots in 5 forest types of South Carolina's upper Coastal Plain, USA. Forest types were mature upland hardwood and bottomland hardwood forest, mature closed-canopy loblolly (Pinus taeda) and longleaf pine (P. palustris) plantation, and recent clearcut regeneration harvests planted with longleaf pine seedlings. Mean annual number of fruits and dry fruit pulp mass were highest in regeneration harvests (264,592 ± 37,444 fruits; 12,009 ± 2,392 g/ha), upland hardwoods (60,769 ± 7,667 fruits; 5,079 ± 529 g/ha), and bottomland hardwoods (65,614 ± 8,351 fruits; 4,621 ± 677 g/ha), and lowest in longleaf pine (44,104 ± 8,301 fruits; 4,102 ± 877 g/ha) and loblolly (39,532 ± 5,034 fruits; 3,261 ± 492 g/ha) plantations. Fruit production was initially high in regeneration harvests and declined with stand development and canopy closure (1995-2003). Fruit availability was highest June-September and lowest in April. More species of fruit-producing plants occurred in upland hardwoods, bottomland hardwoods, and regeneration harvests than in loblolly and longleaf pine plantations. Several species produced fruit only in 1 or 2 forest types. In sum, fruit availability varied temporally and spatially because of differences in species composition among forest types and age classes, patchy distributions of fruiting plants both within and among forest types, fruiting phenology, high inter-annual variation in fruit crop size by some dominant fruit-producing species, and the dynamic process of disturbance-adapted species colonization and decline, or recovery in recently harvested stands. Land managers could enhance fruit availability for wildlife by creating and maintaining diverse forest types and age classes.",
keywords = "Coastal Plain forest, Savannah River Site, bottomland hardwoods, clearcut regeneration, fruit, pine plantation, soft mast, timber harvest, upland hardwoods, wildlife food",
author = "Greenberg, {Cathryn H.} and Levey, {Douglas J.} and Charles Kwit and McCarty, {John P} and Pearson, {Scott F.} and Sarah Sargent and John Kilgo",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jwmg.343",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "1036--1046",
journal = "Journal of Wildlife Management",
issn = "0022-541X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Long-term patterns of fruit production in five forest types of the South Carolina upper coastal plain

AU - Greenberg, Cathryn H.

AU - Levey, Douglas J.

AU - Kwit, Charles

AU - McCarty, John P

AU - Pearson, Scott F.

AU - Sargent, Sarah

AU - Kilgo, John

PY - 2012/7/1

Y1 - 2012/7/1

N2 - Fleshy fruit is a key food resource for many vertebrates and may be particularly important energy source to birds during fall migration and winter. Hence, land managers should know how fruit availability varies among forest types, seasons, and years. We quantified fleshy fruit abundance monthly for 9 years (1995-2003) in 56 0.1-ha plots in 5 forest types of South Carolina's upper Coastal Plain, USA. Forest types were mature upland hardwood and bottomland hardwood forest, mature closed-canopy loblolly (Pinus taeda) and longleaf pine (P. palustris) plantation, and recent clearcut regeneration harvests planted with longleaf pine seedlings. Mean annual number of fruits and dry fruit pulp mass were highest in regeneration harvests (264,592 ± 37,444 fruits; 12,009 ± 2,392 g/ha), upland hardwoods (60,769 ± 7,667 fruits; 5,079 ± 529 g/ha), and bottomland hardwoods (65,614 ± 8,351 fruits; 4,621 ± 677 g/ha), and lowest in longleaf pine (44,104 ± 8,301 fruits; 4,102 ± 877 g/ha) and loblolly (39,532 ± 5,034 fruits; 3,261 ± 492 g/ha) plantations. Fruit production was initially high in regeneration harvests and declined with stand development and canopy closure (1995-2003). Fruit availability was highest June-September and lowest in April. More species of fruit-producing plants occurred in upland hardwoods, bottomland hardwoods, and regeneration harvests than in loblolly and longleaf pine plantations. Several species produced fruit only in 1 or 2 forest types. In sum, fruit availability varied temporally and spatially because of differences in species composition among forest types and age classes, patchy distributions of fruiting plants both within and among forest types, fruiting phenology, high inter-annual variation in fruit crop size by some dominant fruit-producing species, and the dynamic process of disturbance-adapted species colonization and decline, or recovery in recently harvested stands. Land managers could enhance fruit availability for wildlife by creating and maintaining diverse forest types and age classes.

AB - Fleshy fruit is a key food resource for many vertebrates and may be particularly important energy source to birds during fall migration and winter. Hence, land managers should know how fruit availability varies among forest types, seasons, and years. We quantified fleshy fruit abundance monthly for 9 years (1995-2003) in 56 0.1-ha plots in 5 forest types of South Carolina's upper Coastal Plain, USA. Forest types were mature upland hardwood and bottomland hardwood forest, mature closed-canopy loblolly (Pinus taeda) and longleaf pine (P. palustris) plantation, and recent clearcut regeneration harvests planted with longleaf pine seedlings. Mean annual number of fruits and dry fruit pulp mass were highest in regeneration harvests (264,592 ± 37,444 fruits; 12,009 ± 2,392 g/ha), upland hardwoods (60,769 ± 7,667 fruits; 5,079 ± 529 g/ha), and bottomland hardwoods (65,614 ± 8,351 fruits; 4,621 ± 677 g/ha), and lowest in longleaf pine (44,104 ± 8,301 fruits; 4,102 ± 877 g/ha) and loblolly (39,532 ± 5,034 fruits; 3,261 ± 492 g/ha) plantations. Fruit production was initially high in regeneration harvests and declined with stand development and canopy closure (1995-2003). Fruit availability was highest June-September and lowest in April. More species of fruit-producing plants occurred in upland hardwoods, bottomland hardwoods, and regeneration harvests than in loblolly and longleaf pine plantations. Several species produced fruit only in 1 or 2 forest types. In sum, fruit availability varied temporally and spatially because of differences in species composition among forest types and age classes, patchy distributions of fruiting plants both within and among forest types, fruiting phenology, high inter-annual variation in fruit crop size by some dominant fruit-producing species, and the dynamic process of disturbance-adapted species colonization and decline, or recovery in recently harvested stands. Land managers could enhance fruit availability for wildlife by creating and maintaining diverse forest types and age classes.

KW - Coastal Plain forest

KW - Savannah River Site

KW - bottomland hardwoods

KW - clearcut regeneration

KW - fruit

KW - pine plantation

KW - soft mast

KW - timber harvest

KW - upland hardwoods

KW - wildlife food

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862854912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862854912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jwmg.343

DO - 10.1002/jwmg.343

M3 - Article

VL - 76

SP - 1036

EP - 1046

JO - Journal of Wildlife Management

JF - Journal of Wildlife Management

SN - 0022-541X

IS - 5

ER -