Long-term follow-up after laser vision correction in physicians: Quality of life and patient satisfaction

Theodore A. Pasquali, David Smadja, Michael J. Savetsky, Glauco H. Reggiani Mello, Fadiah Alkhawaldeh, Ronald R. Krueger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the satisfaction and quality of life after laser vision correction (LVC) exclusively in a physician population. Setting Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. Design Cohort study. Methods A 12-question survey targeted toward physicians and the unique qualities of their experience with refractive surgery was sent to physicians who had refractive surgery at the Cole Eye Institute between 2000 and 2012. In conjunction, the visual outcomes and clinical information of physicians who received the survey were reviewed. Results Two hundred twenty-six physicians (439 eyes) met the inclusion criteria for our study. One hundred thirty-two physicians (58%) responded to the survey and reported an overall satisfaction rate of 95.3%. Respondents included surgeons (28.0%), physicians who perform procedures but not surgery (43.2%), and physicians who do not perform procedures or surgery (28.8%). Of the physicians, 84.8% reported an improvement in the quality of vision compared with the corrected preoperative vision, 39.0% reported that their ability to perform procedures accurately had improved and 1.6% said they believed their ability to perform procedures was less. Ninety-six percent reported they would have the procedure again. Visual outcomes showed high levels of surgical predictability, efficacy, and safety. Conclusion Despite high visual demands, physicians having LVC had a high percentage of good visual outcomes, satisfaction, and quality-of-life improvements. Financial Disclosure No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)395-402
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of cataract and refractive surgery
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2014

Fingerprint

Patient Satisfaction
Lasers
Quality of Life
Physicians
Refractive Surgical Procedures
Aptitude
Quality Improvement
compound A 12
Disclosure
Cohort Studies
Safety
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Long-term follow-up after laser vision correction in physicians : Quality of life and patient satisfaction. / Pasquali, Theodore A.; Smadja, David; Savetsky, Michael J.; Reggiani Mello, Glauco H.; Alkhawaldeh, Fadiah; Krueger, Ronald R.

In: Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, Vol. 40, No. 3, 01.03.2014, p. 395-402.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pasquali, Theodore A. ; Smadja, David ; Savetsky, Michael J. ; Reggiani Mello, Glauco H. ; Alkhawaldeh, Fadiah ; Krueger, Ronald R. / Long-term follow-up after laser vision correction in physicians : Quality of life and patient satisfaction. In: Journal of cataract and refractive surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 40, No. 3. pp. 395-402.
@article{35dcf0bc0a9a4aeebf0f6b2440ce5c65,
title = "Long-term follow-up after laser vision correction in physicians: Quality of life and patient satisfaction",
abstract = "Purpose To evaluate the satisfaction and quality of life after laser vision correction (LVC) exclusively in a physician population. Setting Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. Design Cohort study. Methods A 12-question survey targeted toward physicians and the unique qualities of their experience with refractive surgery was sent to physicians who had refractive surgery at the Cole Eye Institute between 2000 and 2012. In conjunction, the visual outcomes and clinical information of physicians who received the survey were reviewed. Results Two hundred twenty-six physicians (439 eyes) met the inclusion criteria for our study. One hundred thirty-two physicians (58{\%}) responded to the survey and reported an overall satisfaction rate of 95.3{\%}. Respondents included surgeons (28.0{\%}), physicians who perform procedures but not surgery (43.2{\%}), and physicians who do not perform procedures or surgery (28.8{\%}). Of the physicians, 84.8{\%} reported an improvement in the quality of vision compared with the corrected preoperative vision, 39.0{\%} reported that their ability to perform procedures accurately had improved and 1.6{\%} said they believed their ability to perform procedures was less. Ninety-six percent reported they would have the procedure again. Visual outcomes showed high levels of surgical predictability, efficacy, and safety. Conclusion Despite high visual demands, physicians having LVC had a high percentage of good visual outcomes, satisfaction, and quality-of-life improvements. Financial Disclosure No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.",
author = "Pasquali, {Theodore A.} and David Smadja and Savetsky, {Michael J.} and {Reggiani Mello}, {Glauco H.} and Fadiah Alkhawaldeh and Krueger, {Ronald R.}",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.08.052",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "395--402",
journal = "Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery",
issn = "0886-3350",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Long-term follow-up after laser vision correction in physicians

T2 - Quality of life and patient satisfaction

AU - Pasquali, Theodore A.

AU - Smadja, David

AU - Savetsky, Michael J.

AU - Reggiani Mello, Glauco H.

AU - Alkhawaldeh, Fadiah

AU - Krueger, Ronald R.

PY - 2014/3/1

Y1 - 2014/3/1

N2 - Purpose To evaluate the satisfaction and quality of life after laser vision correction (LVC) exclusively in a physician population. Setting Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. Design Cohort study. Methods A 12-question survey targeted toward physicians and the unique qualities of their experience with refractive surgery was sent to physicians who had refractive surgery at the Cole Eye Institute between 2000 and 2012. In conjunction, the visual outcomes and clinical information of physicians who received the survey were reviewed. Results Two hundred twenty-six physicians (439 eyes) met the inclusion criteria for our study. One hundred thirty-two physicians (58%) responded to the survey and reported an overall satisfaction rate of 95.3%. Respondents included surgeons (28.0%), physicians who perform procedures but not surgery (43.2%), and physicians who do not perform procedures or surgery (28.8%). Of the physicians, 84.8% reported an improvement in the quality of vision compared with the corrected preoperative vision, 39.0% reported that their ability to perform procedures accurately had improved and 1.6% said they believed their ability to perform procedures was less. Ninety-six percent reported they would have the procedure again. Visual outcomes showed high levels of surgical predictability, efficacy, and safety. Conclusion Despite high visual demands, physicians having LVC had a high percentage of good visual outcomes, satisfaction, and quality-of-life improvements. Financial Disclosure No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

AB - Purpose To evaluate the satisfaction and quality of life after laser vision correction (LVC) exclusively in a physician population. Setting Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. Design Cohort study. Methods A 12-question survey targeted toward physicians and the unique qualities of their experience with refractive surgery was sent to physicians who had refractive surgery at the Cole Eye Institute between 2000 and 2012. In conjunction, the visual outcomes and clinical information of physicians who received the survey were reviewed. Results Two hundred twenty-six physicians (439 eyes) met the inclusion criteria for our study. One hundred thirty-two physicians (58%) responded to the survey and reported an overall satisfaction rate of 95.3%. Respondents included surgeons (28.0%), physicians who perform procedures but not surgery (43.2%), and physicians who do not perform procedures or surgery (28.8%). Of the physicians, 84.8% reported an improvement in the quality of vision compared with the corrected preoperative vision, 39.0% reported that their ability to perform procedures accurately had improved and 1.6% said they believed their ability to perform procedures was less. Ninety-six percent reported they would have the procedure again. Visual outcomes showed high levels of surgical predictability, efficacy, and safety. Conclusion Despite high visual demands, physicians having LVC had a high percentage of good visual outcomes, satisfaction, and quality-of-life improvements. Financial Disclosure No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896804491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896804491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.08.052

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.08.052

M3 - Article

C2 - 24581772

AN - SCOPUS:84896804491

VL - 40

SP - 395

EP - 402

JO - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

SN - 0886-3350

IS - 3

ER -