Literature reviews in IS research: What can be learnt from the past and other fields?

Guido Schryen, Alexander Benlian, Frantz Rowe, Shirley Gregor, Kai Larsen, Stacie Petter, Guy Paré, Gerit Wagner, Steffi Haag, Emrah Yasasin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Literature reviews (LRs) are recognized for their increasing impact in the information systems literature. Methodologists have drawn attention to the question of how we can leverage the value of LRs to preserve and generate knowledge. The panelists who participated in the discussion of “Standalone Literature Reviews in IS Research: What Can Be Learnt from the Past and Other Fields?” at ICIS 2016 in Dublin acknowledged this significant issue and debated 1) what the IS field can learn from other fields and where IS-specific challenges occur, 2) how the IS field should move forward to foster the genre of LRs, and 3) the best practices to train doctoral IS students in publishing LRs. This paper reports the key takeaways of this panel discussion. We provide guidance for IS scholars on how to conduct LRs that contribute to the cumulative knowledge development in and across the IS field to best prepare the next generation of IS scholars.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number30
Pages (from-to)759-774
Number of pages16
JournalCommunications of the Association for Information Systems
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2017

Fingerprint

Information systems
Students

Keywords

  • Doctoral training
  • Literature review
  • Research methodology
  • Review methodology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems

Cite this

Schryen, G., Benlian, A., Rowe, F., Gregor, S., Larsen, K., Petter, S., ... Yasasin, E. (2017). Literature reviews in IS research: What can be learnt from the past and other fields? Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 41(1), 759-774. [30]. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04130

Literature reviews in IS research : What can be learnt from the past and other fields? / Schryen, Guido; Benlian, Alexander; Rowe, Frantz; Gregor, Shirley; Larsen, Kai; Petter, Stacie; Paré, Guy; Wagner, Gerit; Haag, Steffi; Yasasin, Emrah.

In: Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 41, No. 1, 30, 12.2017, p. 759-774.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schryen, G, Benlian, A, Rowe, F, Gregor, S, Larsen, K, Petter, S, Paré, G, Wagner, G, Haag, S & Yasasin, E 2017, 'Literature reviews in IS research: What can be learnt from the past and other fields?', Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 41, no. 1, 30, pp. 759-774. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04130
Schryen, Guido ; Benlian, Alexander ; Rowe, Frantz ; Gregor, Shirley ; Larsen, Kai ; Petter, Stacie ; Paré, Guy ; Wagner, Gerit ; Haag, Steffi ; Yasasin, Emrah. / Literature reviews in IS research : What can be learnt from the past and other fields?. In: Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 2017 ; Vol. 41, No. 1. pp. 759-774.
@article{40a911d29c874a0fa18a19d73481a4bb,
title = "Literature reviews in IS research: What can be learnt from the past and other fields?",
abstract = "Literature reviews (LRs) are recognized for their increasing impact in the information systems literature. Methodologists have drawn attention to the question of how we can leverage the value of LRs to preserve and generate knowledge. The panelists who participated in the discussion of “Standalone Literature Reviews in IS Research: What Can Be Learnt from the Past and Other Fields?” at ICIS 2016 in Dublin acknowledged this significant issue and debated 1) what the IS field can learn from other fields and where IS-specific challenges occur, 2) how the IS field should move forward to foster the genre of LRs, and 3) the best practices to train doctoral IS students in publishing LRs. This paper reports the key takeaways of this panel discussion. We provide guidance for IS scholars on how to conduct LRs that contribute to the cumulative knowledge development in and across the IS field to best prepare the next generation of IS scholars.",
keywords = "Doctoral training, Literature review, Research methodology, Review methodology",
author = "Guido Schryen and Alexander Benlian and Frantz Rowe and Shirley Gregor and Kai Larsen and Stacie Petter and Guy Par{\'e} and Gerit Wagner and Steffi Haag and Emrah Yasasin",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
doi = "10.17705/1CAIS.04130",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "759--774",
journal = "Communications of the Association for Information Systems",
issn = "1529-3181",
publisher = "Association for Information Systems",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Literature reviews in IS research

T2 - What can be learnt from the past and other fields?

AU - Schryen, Guido

AU - Benlian, Alexander

AU - Rowe, Frantz

AU - Gregor, Shirley

AU - Larsen, Kai

AU - Petter, Stacie

AU - Paré, Guy

AU - Wagner, Gerit

AU - Haag, Steffi

AU - Yasasin, Emrah

PY - 2017/12

Y1 - 2017/12

N2 - Literature reviews (LRs) are recognized for their increasing impact in the information systems literature. Methodologists have drawn attention to the question of how we can leverage the value of LRs to preserve and generate knowledge. The panelists who participated in the discussion of “Standalone Literature Reviews in IS Research: What Can Be Learnt from the Past and Other Fields?” at ICIS 2016 in Dublin acknowledged this significant issue and debated 1) what the IS field can learn from other fields and where IS-specific challenges occur, 2) how the IS field should move forward to foster the genre of LRs, and 3) the best practices to train doctoral IS students in publishing LRs. This paper reports the key takeaways of this panel discussion. We provide guidance for IS scholars on how to conduct LRs that contribute to the cumulative knowledge development in and across the IS field to best prepare the next generation of IS scholars.

AB - Literature reviews (LRs) are recognized for their increasing impact in the information systems literature. Methodologists have drawn attention to the question of how we can leverage the value of LRs to preserve and generate knowledge. The panelists who participated in the discussion of “Standalone Literature Reviews in IS Research: What Can Be Learnt from the Past and Other Fields?” at ICIS 2016 in Dublin acknowledged this significant issue and debated 1) what the IS field can learn from other fields and where IS-specific challenges occur, 2) how the IS field should move forward to foster the genre of LRs, and 3) the best practices to train doctoral IS students in publishing LRs. This paper reports the key takeaways of this panel discussion. We provide guidance for IS scholars on how to conduct LRs that contribute to the cumulative knowledge development in and across the IS field to best prepare the next generation of IS scholars.

KW - Doctoral training

KW - Literature review

KW - Research methodology

KW - Review methodology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037734257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85037734257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.17705/1CAIS.04130

DO - 10.17705/1CAIS.04130

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85037734257

VL - 41

SP - 759

EP - 774

JO - Communications of the Association for Information Systems

JF - Communications of the Association for Information Systems

SN - 1529-3181

IS - 1

M1 - 30

ER -