Listening effort and perceived clarity for normal-hearing children with the use of digital noise reduction

Samantha Gustafson, Ryan W McCreery, Brenda Hoover, Judy G. Kopun, Pat Stelmachowicz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:: The goal of this study was to evaluate how digital noise reduction (DNR) impacts listening effort and judgment of sound clarity in children with normal hearing. It was hypothesized that when two DNR algorithms differing in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) output are compared, the algorithm that provides the greatest improvement in overall output SNR will reduce listening effort and receive a better clarity rating from child listeners. A secondary goal was to evaluate the relation between the inversion method measurements and listening effort with DNR processing. DESIGN:: Twenty-four children with normal hearing (ages 7 to 12 years) participated in a speech recognition task in which consonant-vowel-consonant nonwords were presented in broadband background noise. Test stimuli were recorded through two hearing aids with DNR off and DNR on at 0 dB and +5 dB input SNR. Stimuli were presented to listeners and verbal response time (VRT) and phoneme recognition scores were measured. The underlying assumption was that an increase in VRT reflects an increase in listening effort. Children rated the sound clarity for each condition. The two commercially available HAs were chosen based on: (1) an inversion technique, which was used to quantify the magnitude of change in SNR with the activation of DNR, and (2) a measure of magnitude-squared coherence, which was used to ensure that DNR in both devices preserved the spectrum. RESULTS:: One device provided a greater improvement in overall output SNR than the other. Both DNR algorithms resulted in minimal spectral distortion as measured using coherence. For both devices, VRT decreased for the DNR-on condition, suggesting that listening effort decreased with DNR in both devices. Clarity ratings were also better in the DNR-on condition for both devices. The device showing the greatest improvement in output SNR with DNR engaged improved phoneme recognition scores. The magnitude of this improved phoneme recognition was not accurately predicted with measurements of output SNR. Measured output SNR varied in the ability to predict other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS:: Overall, results suggest that DNR effectively reduces listening effort and improves subjective clarity ratings in children with normal hearing but that these improvements are not necessarily related to the output SNR improvements or preserved speech spectra provided by the DNR.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)183-194
Number of pages12
JournalEar and hearing
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2014

Fingerprint

Hearing
Noise
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Equipment and Supplies
Reaction Time
Aptitude
Hearing Aids

Keywords

  • Children
  • Digital noise reduction
  • Hearing aids
  • Listening effort

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Listening effort and perceived clarity for normal-hearing children with the use of digital noise reduction. / Gustafson, Samantha; McCreery, Ryan W; Hoover, Brenda; Kopun, Judy G.; Stelmachowicz, Pat.

In: Ear and hearing, Vol. 35, No. 2, 01.03.2014, p. 183-194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gustafson, Samantha ; McCreery, Ryan W ; Hoover, Brenda ; Kopun, Judy G. ; Stelmachowicz, Pat. / Listening effort and perceived clarity for normal-hearing children with the use of digital noise reduction. In: Ear and hearing. 2014 ; Vol. 35, No. 2. pp. 183-194.
@article{af0274f957d34cb6b3ebe40b3e9e4d0a,
title = "Listening effort and perceived clarity for normal-hearing children with the use of digital noise reduction",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES:: The goal of this study was to evaluate how digital noise reduction (DNR) impacts listening effort and judgment of sound clarity in children with normal hearing. It was hypothesized that when two DNR algorithms differing in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) output are compared, the algorithm that provides the greatest improvement in overall output SNR will reduce listening effort and receive a better clarity rating from child listeners. A secondary goal was to evaluate the relation between the inversion method measurements and listening effort with DNR processing. DESIGN:: Twenty-four children with normal hearing (ages 7 to 12 years) participated in a speech recognition task in which consonant-vowel-consonant nonwords were presented in broadband background noise. Test stimuli were recorded through two hearing aids with DNR off and DNR on at 0 dB and +5 dB input SNR. Stimuli were presented to listeners and verbal response time (VRT) and phoneme recognition scores were measured. The underlying assumption was that an increase in VRT reflects an increase in listening effort. Children rated the sound clarity for each condition. The two commercially available HAs were chosen based on: (1) an inversion technique, which was used to quantify the magnitude of change in SNR with the activation of DNR, and (2) a measure of magnitude-squared coherence, which was used to ensure that DNR in both devices preserved the spectrum. RESULTS:: One device provided a greater improvement in overall output SNR than the other. Both DNR algorithms resulted in minimal spectral distortion as measured using coherence. For both devices, VRT decreased for the DNR-on condition, suggesting that listening effort decreased with DNR in both devices. Clarity ratings were also better in the DNR-on condition for both devices. The device showing the greatest improvement in output SNR with DNR engaged improved phoneme recognition scores. The magnitude of this improved phoneme recognition was not accurately predicted with measurements of output SNR. Measured output SNR varied in the ability to predict other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS:: Overall, results suggest that DNR effectively reduces listening effort and improves subjective clarity ratings in children with normal hearing but that these improvements are not necessarily related to the output SNR improvements or preserved speech spectra provided by the DNR.",
keywords = "Children, Digital noise reduction, Hearing aids, Listening effort",
author = "Samantha Gustafson and McCreery, {Ryan W} and Brenda Hoover and Kopun, {Judy G.} and Pat Stelmachowicz",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.aud.0000440715.85844.b8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "183--194",
journal = "Ear and Hearing",
issn = "0196-0202",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Listening effort and perceived clarity for normal-hearing children with the use of digital noise reduction

AU - Gustafson, Samantha

AU - McCreery, Ryan W

AU - Hoover, Brenda

AU - Kopun, Judy G.

AU - Stelmachowicz, Pat

PY - 2014/3/1

Y1 - 2014/3/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES:: The goal of this study was to evaluate how digital noise reduction (DNR) impacts listening effort and judgment of sound clarity in children with normal hearing. It was hypothesized that when two DNR algorithms differing in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) output are compared, the algorithm that provides the greatest improvement in overall output SNR will reduce listening effort and receive a better clarity rating from child listeners. A secondary goal was to evaluate the relation between the inversion method measurements and listening effort with DNR processing. DESIGN:: Twenty-four children with normal hearing (ages 7 to 12 years) participated in a speech recognition task in which consonant-vowel-consonant nonwords were presented in broadband background noise. Test stimuli were recorded through two hearing aids with DNR off and DNR on at 0 dB and +5 dB input SNR. Stimuli were presented to listeners and verbal response time (VRT) and phoneme recognition scores were measured. The underlying assumption was that an increase in VRT reflects an increase in listening effort. Children rated the sound clarity for each condition. The two commercially available HAs were chosen based on: (1) an inversion technique, which was used to quantify the magnitude of change in SNR with the activation of DNR, and (2) a measure of magnitude-squared coherence, which was used to ensure that DNR in both devices preserved the spectrum. RESULTS:: One device provided a greater improvement in overall output SNR than the other. Both DNR algorithms resulted in minimal spectral distortion as measured using coherence. For both devices, VRT decreased for the DNR-on condition, suggesting that listening effort decreased with DNR in both devices. Clarity ratings were also better in the DNR-on condition for both devices. The device showing the greatest improvement in output SNR with DNR engaged improved phoneme recognition scores. The magnitude of this improved phoneme recognition was not accurately predicted with measurements of output SNR. Measured output SNR varied in the ability to predict other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS:: Overall, results suggest that DNR effectively reduces listening effort and improves subjective clarity ratings in children with normal hearing but that these improvements are not necessarily related to the output SNR improvements or preserved speech spectra provided by the DNR.

AB - OBJECTIVES:: The goal of this study was to evaluate how digital noise reduction (DNR) impacts listening effort and judgment of sound clarity in children with normal hearing. It was hypothesized that when two DNR algorithms differing in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) output are compared, the algorithm that provides the greatest improvement in overall output SNR will reduce listening effort and receive a better clarity rating from child listeners. A secondary goal was to evaluate the relation between the inversion method measurements and listening effort with DNR processing. DESIGN:: Twenty-four children with normal hearing (ages 7 to 12 years) participated in a speech recognition task in which consonant-vowel-consonant nonwords were presented in broadband background noise. Test stimuli were recorded through two hearing aids with DNR off and DNR on at 0 dB and +5 dB input SNR. Stimuli were presented to listeners and verbal response time (VRT) and phoneme recognition scores were measured. The underlying assumption was that an increase in VRT reflects an increase in listening effort. Children rated the sound clarity for each condition. The two commercially available HAs were chosen based on: (1) an inversion technique, which was used to quantify the magnitude of change in SNR with the activation of DNR, and (2) a measure of magnitude-squared coherence, which was used to ensure that DNR in both devices preserved the spectrum. RESULTS:: One device provided a greater improvement in overall output SNR than the other. Both DNR algorithms resulted in minimal spectral distortion as measured using coherence. For both devices, VRT decreased for the DNR-on condition, suggesting that listening effort decreased with DNR in both devices. Clarity ratings were also better in the DNR-on condition for both devices. The device showing the greatest improvement in output SNR with DNR engaged improved phoneme recognition scores. The magnitude of this improved phoneme recognition was not accurately predicted with measurements of output SNR. Measured output SNR varied in the ability to predict other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS:: Overall, results suggest that DNR effectively reduces listening effort and improves subjective clarity ratings in children with normal hearing but that these improvements are not necessarily related to the output SNR improvements or preserved speech spectra provided by the DNR.

KW - Children

KW - Digital noise reduction

KW - Hearing aids

KW - Listening effort

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894548280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894548280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.aud.0000440715.85844.b8

DO - 10.1097/01.aud.0000440715.85844.b8

M3 - Article

C2 - 24473240

AN - SCOPUS:84894548280

VL - 35

SP - 183

EP - 194

JO - Ear and Hearing

JF - Ear and Hearing

SN - 0196-0202

IS - 2

ER -