Linking Genetics and Political Attitudes: Reconceptualizing Political Ideology

Kevin B. Smith, Douglas R. Oxley, Matthew V. Hibbing, John R. Alford, John R Hibbing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, we trace the route by which genetics could ultimately connect to issue attitudes and suggest that central to this connection are chronic dispositional preferences for mass-scale social rules, order, and conduct-what we label political ideology. The need to resolve bedrock social dilemmas concerning such matters as leadership style, protection from outgroups, and the degree to which norms of conduct are malleable, is present in any large-scale social unit at any time. This universality is important in that it leaves open the possibility that genetics could influence stances on issues of the day. Here, we measure orientation to these bedrock principles in two ways-a survey of conscious, self-reported positions and an implicit association test (IAT) of latent orientations toward fixed or flexible rules of social conduct. In an initial test, both measures were predictive of stances on issues of the day as well as of ideological self-labeling, thereby suggesting that the heritability of specific issue attitudes could be the result of the heritability of general orientations toward bedrock principles of mass-scale group life.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)369-397
Number of pages29
JournalPolitical Psychology
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2011

Fingerprint

political ideology
political attitude
social dilemma
outgroup
leadership
Political Ideology
Group
Heritability
Stance
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Bedrock principles
  • Biology
  • Genes
  • IAT
  • Ideology
  • Political attitudes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Philosophy
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Linking Genetics and Political Attitudes : Reconceptualizing Political Ideology. / Smith, Kevin B.; Oxley, Douglas R.; Hibbing, Matthew V.; Alford, John R.; Hibbing, John R.

In: Political Psychology, Vol. 32, No. 3, 01.06.2011, p. 369-397.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, Kevin B. ; Oxley, Douglas R. ; Hibbing, Matthew V. ; Alford, John R. ; Hibbing, John R. / Linking Genetics and Political Attitudes : Reconceptualizing Political Ideology. In: Political Psychology. 2011 ; Vol. 32, No. 3. pp. 369-397.
@article{0cd023f5d09c4636b847e2484d6806a7,
title = "Linking Genetics and Political Attitudes: Reconceptualizing Political Ideology",
abstract = "In this paper, we trace the route by which genetics could ultimately connect to issue attitudes and suggest that central to this connection are chronic dispositional preferences for mass-scale social rules, order, and conduct-what we label political ideology. The need to resolve bedrock social dilemmas concerning such matters as leadership style, protection from outgroups, and the degree to which norms of conduct are malleable, is present in any large-scale social unit at any time. This universality is important in that it leaves open the possibility that genetics could influence stances on issues of the day. Here, we measure orientation to these bedrock principles in two ways-a survey of conscious, self-reported positions and an implicit association test (IAT) of latent orientations toward fixed or flexible rules of social conduct. In an initial test, both measures were predictive of stances on issues of the day as well as of ideological self-labeling, thereby suggesting that the heritability of specific issue attitudes could be the result of the heritability of general orientations toward bedrock principles of mass-scale group life.",
keywords = "Bedrock principles, Biology, Genes, IAT, Ideology, Political attitudes",
author = "Smith, {Kevin B.} and Oxley, {Douglas R.} and Hibbing, {Matthew V.} and Alford, {John R.} and Hibbing, {John R}",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00821.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "369--397",
journal = "Political Psychology",
issn = "0162-895X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Linking Genetics and Political Attitudes

T2 - Reconceptualizing Political Ideology

AU - Smith, Kevin B.

AU - Oxley, Douglas R.

AU - Hibbing, Matthew V.

AU - Alford, John R.

AU - Hibbing, John R

PY - 2011/6/1

Y1 - 2011/6/1

N2 - In this paper, we trace the route by which genetics could ultimately connect to issue attitudes and suggest that central to this connection are chronic dispositional preferences for mass-scale social rules, order, and conduct-what we label political ideology. The need to resolve bedrock social dilemmas concerning such matters as leadership style, protection from outgroups, and the degree to which norms of conduct are malleable, is present in any large-scale social unit at any time. This universality is important in that it leaves open the possibility that genetics could influence stances on issues of the day. Here, we measure orientation to these bedrock principles in two ways-a survey of conscious, self-reported positions and an implicit association test (IAT) of latent orientations toward fixed or flexible rules of social conduct. In an initial test, both measures were predictive of stances on issues of the day as well as of ideological self-labeling, thereby suggesting that the heritability of specific issue attitudes could be the result of the heritability of general orientations toward bedrock principles of mass-scale group life.

AB - In this paper, we trace the route by which genetics could ultimately connect to issue attitudes and suggest that central to this connection are chronic dispositional preferences for mass-scale social rules, order, and conduct-what we label political ideology. The need to resolve bedrock social dilemmas concerning such matters as leadership style, protection from outgroups, and the degree to which norms of conduct are malleable, is present in any large-scale social unit at any time. This universality is important in that it leaves open the possibility that genetics could influence stances on issues of the day. Here, we measure orientation to these bedrock principles in two ways-a survey of conscious, self-reported positions and an implicit association test (IAT) of latent orientations toward fixed or flexible rules of social conduct. In an initial test, both measures were predictive of stances on issues of the day as well as of ideological self-labeling, thereby suggesting that the heritability of specific issue attitudes could be the result of the heritability of general orientations toward bedrock principles of mass-scale group life.

KW - Bedrock principles

KW - Biology

KW - Genes

KW - IAT

KW - Ideology

KW - Political attitudes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955620733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955620733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00821.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00821.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79955620733

VL - 32

SP - 369

EP - 397

JO - Political Psychology

JF - Political Psychology

SN - 0162-895X

IS - 3

ER -