Abstract
Historically, there have been two competing goals of probation: law enforcement and rehabilitation of the offender. Accordingly, the role, functions, and tasks of probation officers are at times in conflict. In this paper we explore the roles of adult and juvenile probation officers and compare their statutorily prescribed duties. In so doing we attempt to uncover what differences exist between adult and juvenile probation officers. We conclude that there are no appreciable differences between the orientation (either law enforcement or rehabilitation) of the tasks adult and juvenile probation officers are mandated to perform. Moreover, the task orientation of probation officers (adult and juvenile) is slanted towards law enforcement.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 47-67 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Journal of Offender Rehabilitation |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2004 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Adult
- Juvenile
- Law enforcement
- Officers
- Probation
- Rehabilitation
- Roles
- Tasks
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Rehabilitation
- Law
Cite this
Legally Prescribed Functions of Adult and Juvenile Probation Officers : Worlds apart? / Steiner, Benjamin M; Purkiss, Marcus; Kifer, Misty; Roberts, Elizabeth; Hemmens, Craig.
In: Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, Vol. 39, No. 4, 01.01.2004, p. 47-67.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Legally Prescribed Functions of Adult and Juvenile Probation Officers
T2 - Worlds apart?
AU - Steiner, Benjamin M
AU - Purkiss, Marcus
AU - Kifer, Misty
AU - Roberts, Elizabeth
AU - Hemmens, Craig
PY - 2004/1/1
Y1 - 2004/1/1
N2 - Historically, there have been two competing goals of probation: law enforcement and rehabilitation of the offender. Accordingly, the role, functions, and tasks of probation officers are at times in conflict. In this paper we explore the roles of adult and juvenile probation officers and compare their statutorily prescribed duties. In so doing we attempt to uncover what differences exist between adult and juvenile probation officers. We conclude that there are no appreciable differences between the orientation (either law enforcement or rehabilitation) of the tasks adult and juvenile probation officers are mandated to perform. Moreover, the task orientation of probation officers (adult and juvenile) is slanted towards law enforcement.
AB - Historically, there have been two competing goals of probation: law enforcement and rehabilitation of the offender. Accordingly, the role, functions, and tasks of probation officers are at times in conflict. In this paper we explore the roles of adult and juvenile probation officers and compare their statutorily prescribed duties. In so doing we attempt to uncover what differences exist between adult and juvenile probation officers. We conclude that there are no appreciable differences between the orientation (either law enforcement or rehabilitation) of the tasks adult and juvenile probation officers are mandated to perform. Moreover, the task orientation of probation officers (adult and juvenile) is slanted towards law enforcement.
KW - Adult
KW - Juvenile
KW - Law enforcement
KW - Officers
KW - Probation
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Roles
KW - Tasks
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18844406164&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18844406164&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1300/J076v39n04_04
DO - 10.1300/J076v39n04_04
M3 - Article
VL - 39
SP - 47
EP - 67
JO - Journal of Offender Rehabilitation
JF - Journal of Offender Rehabilitation
SN - 1050-9674
IS - 4
ER -