Legally Prescribed Functions of Adult and Juvenile Probation Officers

Worlds apart?

Benjamin M Steiner, Marcus Purkiss, Misty Kifer, Elizabeth Roberts, Craig Hemmens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Historically, there have been two competing goals of probation: law enforcement and rehabilitation of the offender. Accordingly, the role, functions, and tasks of probation officers are at times in conflict. In this paper we explore the roles of adult and juvenile probation officers and compare their statutorily prescribed duties. In so doing we attempt to uncover what differences exist between adult and juvenile probation officers. We conclude that there are no appreciable differences between the orientation (either law enforcement or rehabilitation) of the tasks adult and juvenile probation officers are mandated to perform. Moreover, the task orientation of probation officers (adult and juvenile) is slanted towards law enforcement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)47-67
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Offender Rehabilitation
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004

Fingerprint

probation officer
Law Enforcement
law enforcement
Rehabilitation
rehabilitation
probation
offender

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Juvenile
  • Law enforcement
  • Officers
  • Probation
  • Rehabilitation
  • Roles
  • Tasks

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Law

Cite this

Legally Prescribed Functions of Adult and Juvenile Probation Officers : Worlds apart? / Steiner, Benjamin M; Purkiss, Marcus; Kifer, Misty; Roberts, Elizabeth; Hemmens, Craig.

In: Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, Vol. 39, No. 4, 01.01.2004, p. 47-67.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Steiner, Benjamin M ; Purkiss, Marcus ; Kifer, Misty ; Roberts, Elizabeth ; Hemmens, Craig. / Legally Prescribed Functions of Adult and Juvenile Probation Officers : Worlds apart?. In: Journal of Offender Rehabilitation. 2004 ; Vol. 39, No. 4. pp. 47-67.
@article{89b00efbf687441887bce982b3054302,
title = "Legally Prescribed Functions of Adult and Juvenile Probation Officers: Worlds apart?",
abstract = "Historically, there have been two competing goals of probation: law enforcement and rehabilitation of the offender. Accordingly, the role, functions, and tasks of probation officers are at times in conflict. In this paper we explore the roles of adult and juvenile probation officers and compare their statutorily prescribed duties. In so doing we attempt to uncover what differences exist between adult and juvenile probation officers. We conclude that there are no appreciable differences between the orientation (either law enforcement or rehabilitation) of the tasks adult and juvenile probation officers are mandated to perform. Moreover, the task orientation of probation officers (adult and juvenile) is slanted towards law enforcement.",
keywords = "Adult, Juvenile, Law enforcement, Officers, Probation, Rehabilitation, Roles, Tasks",
author = "Steiner, {Benjamin M} and Marcus Purkiss and Misty Kifer and Elizabeth Roberts and Craig Hemmens",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1300/J076v39n04_04",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "47--67",
journal = "Journal of Offender Rehabilitation",
issn = "1050-9674",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Legally Prescribed Functions of Adult and Juvenile Probation Officers

T2 - Worlds apart?

AU - Steiner, Benjamin M

AU - Purkiss, Marcus

AU - Kifer, Misty

AU - Roberts, Elizabeth

AU - Hemmens, Craig

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - Historically, there have been two competing goals of probation: law enforcement and rehabilitation of the offender. Accordingly, the role, functions, and tasks of probation officers are at times in conflict. In this paper we explore the roles of adult and juvenile probation officers and compare their statutorily prescribed duties. In so doing we attempt to uncover what differences exist between adult and juvenile probation officers. We conclude that there are no appreciable differences between the orientation (either law enforcement or rehabilitation) of the tasks adult and juvenile probation officers are mandated to perform. Moreover, the task orientation of probation officers (adult and juvenile) is slanted towards law enforcement.

AB - Historically, there have been two competing goals of probation: law enforcement and rehabilitation of the offender. Accordingly, the role, functions, and tasks of probation officers are at times in conflict. In this paper we explore the roles of adult and juvenile probation officers and compare their statutorily prescribed duties. In so doing we attempt to uncover what differences exist between adult and juvenile probation officers. We conclude that there are no appreciable differences between the orientation (either law enforcement or rehabilitation) of the tasks adult and juvenile probation officers are mandated to perform. Moreover, the task orientation of probation officers (adult and juvenile) is slanted towards law enforcement.

KW - Adult

KW - Juvenile

KW - Law enforcement

KW - Officers

KW - Probation

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Roles

KW - Tasks

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18844406164&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18844406164&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1300/J076v39n04_04

DO - 10.1300/J076v39n04_04

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 47

EP - 67

JO - Journal of Offender Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Offender Rehabilitation

SN - 1050-9674

IS - 4

ER -