Learning preferences, computer attitudes, and test performance with computer-aided instruction

Thomas G. Lynch, David J. Steele, Jodi E. Johnson Palensky, Naomi L. Lacy, Sean W. Duffy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Learning preference refers to how individuals choose to approach learning situations. Computer-aided instruction (CAI) permits the adaptation of educational content to individual student learning strategies. Methods: To determine if learning preference and computer attitude influence the acquisition of knowledge using CAI materials, a prototype CAI program was developed that incorporated differing learning exercises. Students (n = 180) completed Rezler's Learning Preference Inventory (LPI) and a computer attitude survey (CAS). The LPI uses three sets of paired scales to characterize learning preference and choice of learning situation. The CAS assesses student attitudes toward computers in general (CAS-G), as well as the educational use of computers (CAS-E). After finishing the program students completed a program attitude survey (CAS-P). Immediate comprehension was assessed by pretests and posttests incorporated into the program. Retention was assessed by a repeat of the posttest 4 to 6 weeks after initial program review. Results: Scores (mean ± SEM) on the pretest, posttest, and late posttest were 38.1% ± 1.35%, 70.9% ± 1.24%, and 62.5% ± 1.44%, respectively. There was no correlation between students' learning preferences or computer attitude and test performance. Conclusions: The data indicate that CAI provides a means of delivering educational content that results in an increase in knowledge that is not correlated with computer attitudes or learning preferences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)368-371
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican journal of surgery
Volume181
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 11 2001

Fingerprint

Learning
Students
Equipment and Supplies
Artificial Intelligence
Surveys and Questionnaires
Exercise

Keywords

  • Computer attitudes
  • Computer-aided instruction
  • Learning preference
  • Learning style
  • Medical student
  • Surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Lynch, T. G., Steele, D. J., Johnson Palensky, J. E., Lacy, N. L., & Duffy, S. W. (2001). Learning preferences, computer attitudes, and test performance with computer-aided instruction. American journal of surgery, 181(4), 368-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00575-X

Learning preferences, computer attitudes, and test performance with computer-aided instruction. / Lynch, Thomas G.; Steele, David J.; Johnson Palensky, Jodi E.; Lacy, Naomi L.; Duffy, Sean W.

In: American journal of surgery, Vol. 181, No. 4, 11.07.2001, p. 368-371.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lynch, Thomas G. ; Steele, David J. ; Johnson Palensky, Jodi E. ; Lacy, Naomi L. ; Duffy, Sean W. / Learning preferences, computer attitudes, and test performance with computer-aided instruction. In: American journal of surgery. 2001 ; Vol. 181, No. 4. pp. 368-371.
@article{291d1dbda97f4a2e838d5ea5643cc242,
title = "Learning preferences, computer attitudes, and test performance with computer-aided instruction",
abstract = "Background: Learning preference refers to how individuals choose to approach learning situations. Computer-aided instruction (CAI) permits the adaptation of educational content to individual student learning strategies. Methods: To determine if learning preference and computer attitude influence the acquisition of knowledge using CAI materials, a prototype CAI program was developed that incorporated differing learning exercises. Students (n = 180) completed Rezler's Learning Preference Inventory (LPI) and a computer attitude survey (CAS). The LPI uses three sets of paired scales to characterize learning preference and choice of learning situation. The CAS assesses student attitudes toward computers in general (CAS-G), as well as the educational use of computers (CAS-E). After finishing the program students completed a program attitude survey (CAS-P). Immediate comprehension was assessed by pretests and posttests incorporated into the program. Retention was assessed by a repeat of the posttest 4 to 6 weeks after initial program review. Results: Scores (mean ± SEM) on the pretest, posttest, and late posttest were 38.1{\%} ± 1.35{\%}, 70.9{\%} ± 1.24{\%}, and 62.5{\%} ± 1.44{\%}, respectively. There was no correlation between students' learning preferences or computer attitude and test performance. Conclusions: The data indicate that CAI provides a means of delivering educational content that results in an increase in knowledge that is not correlated with computer attitudes or learning preferences.",
keywords = "Computer attitudes, Computer-aided instruction, Learning preference, Learning style, Medical student, Surgery",
author = "Lynch, {Thomas G.} and Steele, {David J.} and {Johnson Palensky}, {Jodi E.} and Lacy, {Naomi L.} and Duffy, {Sean W.}",
year = "2001",
month = "7",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00575-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "181",
pages = "368--371",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning preferences, computer attitudes, and test performance with computer-aided instruction

AU - Lynch, Thomas G.

AU - Steele, David J.

AU - Johnson Palensky, Jodi E.

AU - Lacy, Naomi L.

AU - Duffy, Sean W.

PY - 2001/7/11

Y1 - 2001/7/11

N2 - Background: Learning preference refers to how individuals choose to approach learning situations. Computer-aided instruction (CAI) permits the adaptation of educational content to individual student learning strategies. Methods: To determine if learning preference and computer attitude influence the acquisition of knowledge using CAI materials, a prototype CAI program was developed that incorporated differing learning exercises. Students (n = 180) completed Rezler's Learning Preference Inventory (LPI) and a computer attitude survey (CAS). The LPI uses three sets of paired scales to characterize learning preference and choice of learning situation. The CAS assesses student attitudes toward computers in general (CAS-G), as well as the educational use of computers (CAS-E). After finishing the program students completed a program attitude survey (CAS-P). Immediate comprehension was assessed by pretests and posttests incorporated into the program. Retention was assessed by a repeat of the posttest 4 to 6 weeks after initial program review. Results: Scores (mean ± SEM) on the pretest, posttest, and late posttest were 38.1% ± 1.35%, 70.9% ± 1.24%, and 62.5% ± 1.44%, respectively. There was no correlation between students' learning preferences or computer attitude and test performance. Conclusions: The data indicate that CAI provides a means of delivering educational content that results in an increase in knowledge that is not correlated with computer attitudes or learning preferences.

AB - Background: Learning preference refers to how individuals choose to approach learning situations. Computer-aided instruction (CAI) permits the adaptation of educational content to individual student learning strategies. Methods: To determine if learning preference and computer attitude influence the acquisition of knowledge using CAI materials, a prototype CAI program was developed that incorporated differing learning exercises. Students (n = 180) completed Rezler's Learning Preference Inventory (LPI) and a computer attitude survey (CAS). The LPI uses three sets of paired scales to characterize learning preference and choice of learning situation. The CAS assesses student attitudes toward computers in general (CAS-G), as well as the educational use of computers (CAS-E). After finishing the program students completed a program attitude survey (CAS-P). Immediate comprehension was assessed by pretests and posttests incorporated into the program. Retention was assessed by a repeat of the posttest 4 to 6 weeks after initial program review. Results: Scores (mean ± SEM) on the pretest, posttest, and late posttest were 38.1% ± 1.35%, 70.9% ± 1.24%, and 62.5% ± 1.44%, respectively. There was no correlation between students' learning preferences or computer attitude and test performance. Conclusions: The data indicate that CAI provides a means of delivering educational content that results in an increase in knowledge that is not correlated with computer attitudes or learning preferences.

KW - Computer attitudes

KW - Computer-aided instruction

KW - Learning preference

KW - Learning style

KW - Medical student

KW - Surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034961017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034961017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00575-X

DO - 10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00575-X

M3 - Article

C2 - 11438276

AN - SCOPUS:0034961017

VL - 181

SP - 368

EP - 371

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 4

ER -