Laparoscopic gastrostomy versus open gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients

Daniel D. Lydiatt, Kenric M. Murayama, Ronald Ray Hollins, Jon S Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Alimentation in the surgically treated head and neck cancer patient frequently requires bypassing the upper aerodigestive tract. The laparoscopic gastrostomy fulfills this criterion. The authors compared 25 laparoscopic gastrostomies (group 1) with 18 open gastrostomies (group 2) performed on head and neck cancer patients. The length of operation, morbidity, mortality, and cost were evaluated. Operative time was significantly shorter in group 1 (40 ± 2 minutes) than in group 2 (56 ± 4 minutes), with P=.003. The major complication rate was 9% for group 1 and 11% for group 2. There was no procedure-related mortality in group 1, but 1 patient died in the immediate postoperative period in group 2. The cost was not significantly different. It is concluded that the laparoscopic gastrostomy is a safe and cost-effective alternative to open gastrostomy in this patient group.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)407-410
Number of pages4
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume106
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 1996

Fingerprint

Gastrostomy
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Costs and Cost Analysis
Mortality
Operative Time
Postoperative Period
Morbidity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Laparoscopic gastrostomy versus open gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients. / Lydiatt, Daniel D.; Murayama, Kenric M.; Hollins, Ronald Ray; Thompson, Jon S.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 106, No. 4, 01.04.1996, p. 407-410.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cd37bed310ed46888d7514a458c253fb,
title = "Laparoscopic gastrostomy versus open gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients",
abstract = "Alimentation in the surgically treated head and neck cancer patient frequently requires bypassing the upper aerodigestive tract. The laparoscopic gastrostomy fulfills this criterion. The authors compared 25 laparoscopic gastrostomies (group 1) with 18 open gastrostomies (group 2) performed on head and neck cancer patients. The length of operation, morbidity, mortality, and cost were evaluated. Operative time was significantly shorter in group 1 (40 ± 2 minutes) than in group 2 (56 ± 4 minutes), with P=.003. The major complication rate was 9{\%} for group 1 and 11{\%} for group 2. There was no procedure-related mortality in group 1, but 1 patient died in the immediate postoperative period in group 2. The cost was not significantly different. It is concluded that the laparoscopic gastrostomy is a safe and cost-effective alternative to open gastrostomy in this patient group.",
author = "Lydiatt, {Daniel D.} and Murayama, {Kenric M.} and Hollins, {Ronald Ray} and Thompson, {Jon S}",
year = "1996",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00005537-199604000-00004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "106",
pages = "407--410",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic gastrostomy versus open gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients

AU - Lydiatt, Daniel D.

AU - Murayama, Kenric M.

AU - Hollins, Ronald Ray

AU - Thompson, Jon S

PY - 1996/4/1

Y1 - 1996/4/1

N2 - Alimentation in the surgically treated head and neck cancer patient frequently requires bypassing the upper aerodigestive tract. The laparoscopic gastrostomy fulfills this criterion. The authors compared 25 laparoscopic gastrostomies (group 1) with 18 open gastrostomies (group 2) performed on head and neck cancer patients. The length of operation, morbidity, mortality, and cost were evaluated. Operative time was significantly shorter in group 1 (40 ± 2 minutes) than in group 2 (56 ± 4 minutes), with P=.003. The major complication rate was 9% for group 1 and 11% for group 2. There was no procedure-related mortality in group 1, but 1 patient died in the immediate postoperative period in group 2. The cost was not significantly different. It is concluded that the laparoscopic gastrostomy is a safe and cost-effective alternative to open gastrostomy in this patient group.

AB - Alimentation in the surgically treated head and neck cancer patient frequently requires bypassing the upper aerodigestive tract. The laparoscopic gastrostomy fulfills this criterion. The authors compared 25 laparoscopic gastrostomies (group 1) with 18 open gastrostomies (group 2) performed on head and neck cancer patients. The length of operation, morbidity, mortality, and cost were evaluated. Operative time was significantly shorter in group 1 (40 ± 2 minutes) than in group 2 (56 ± 4 minutes), with P=.003. The major complication rate was 9% for group 1 and 11% for group 2. There was no procedure-related mortality in group 1, but 1 patient died in the immediate postoperative period in group 2. The cost was not significantly different. It is concluded that the laparoscopic gastrostomy is a safe and cost-effective alternative to open gastrostomy in this patient group.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029933426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029933426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00005537-199604000-00004

DO - 10.1097/00005537-199604000-00004

M3 - Article

C2 - 8614213

AN - SCOPUS:0029933426

VL - 106

SP - 407

EP - 410

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 4

ER -