Laparoscopic gastrostomy: A safe method for obtaining enteral access

Kenric M. Murayama, Philip D. Schneider, Jon S Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Laparoscopic gastrostomy is a relatively new procedure which does not require a laparotomy but which allows direct visualization of the gastrostomy tube entering the stomach and the stomach-parietal peritoneum interface. The role of the laparoscopically placed gastrostomy for enteral access has yet to be defined. Our aim was to compare laparoscopic gastrostomy with open surgical gastrostomy to determine the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic gastrostomy as a method for obtaining long term enteral access. We reviewed the records of 32 patients (December 1992 to April 1994) who had laparoscopic gastrostomy (group I) and 37 patients (January 1987 to December 1993) who had open gastrostomy (group II). The indications, length of operation, and morbidity and mortality rates in both groups were compared. The underlying diseases and indications for gastrostomy placement were similar in both groups. Both groups included primarily patients who were not candidates for upper endoscopy. Operative time was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic gastrostomy group (38 ± 7 min) than in the open gastrostomy group (62 ± 19), P < 0.0001. Major complication for laparoscopic gastrostomy was 6% and for open gastrostomy was 11%. There was no procedure-related mortality in group I and three patients in group II died in the immediate postoperative period. Major morbidity and mortality rates were not significantly different between the two groups. Laparoscopic gastrostomy is a safe and effective alternative to open gastrostomy, particularly in patients unable to undergo upper endoscopy or in patients undergoing a concomitant laparoscopic procedure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-5
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume58
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1995

Fingerprint

Gastrostomy
Small Intestine
Endoscopy
Mortality
Stomach
Morbidity
Peritoneum
Operative Time
Postoperative Period
Laparotomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Laparoscopic gastrostomy : A safe method for obtaining enteral access. / Murayama, Kenric M.; Schneider, Philip D.; Thompson, Jon S.

In: Journal of Surgical Research, Vol. 58, No. 1, 01.1995, p. 1-5.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Murayama, Kenric M. ; Schneider, Philip D. ; Thompson, Jon S. / Laparoscopic gastrostomy : A safe method for obtaining enteral access. In: Journal of Surgical Research. 1995 ; Vol. 58, No. 1. pp. 1-5.
@article{5918f2e11a8d4816b5b9300c2cc20879,
title = "Laparoscopic gastrostomy: A safe method for obtaining enteral access",
abstract = "Laparoscopic gastrostomy is a relatively new procedure which does not require a laparotomy but which allows direct visualization of the gastrostomy tube entering the stomach and the stomach-parietal peritoneum interface. The role of the laparoscopically placed gastrostomy for enteral access has yet to be defined. Our aim was to compare laparoscopic gastrostomy with open surgical gastrostomy to determine the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic gastrostomy as a method for obtaining long term enteral access. We reviewed the records of 32 patients (December 1992 to April 1994) who had laparoscopic gastrostomy (group I) and 37 patients (January 1987 to December 1993) who had open gastrostomy (group II). The indications, length of operation, and morbidity and mortality rates in both groups were compared. The underlying diseases and indications for gastrostomy placement were similar in both groups. Both groups included primarily patients who were not candidates for upper endoscopy. Operative time was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic gastrostomy group (38 ± 7 min) than in the open gastrostomy group (62 ± 19), P < 0.0001. Major complication for laparoscopic gastrostomy was 6{\%} and for open gastrostomy was 11{\%}. There was no procedure-related mortality in group I and three patients in group II died in the immediate postoperative period. Major morbidity and mortality rates were not significantly different between the two groups. Laparoscopic gastrostomy is a safe and effective alternative to open gastrostomy, particularly in patients unable to undergo upper endoscopy or in patients undergoing a concomitant laparoscopic procedure.",
author = "Murayama, {Kenric M.} and Schneider, {Philip D.} and Thompson, {Jon S}",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1006/jsre.1995.1001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "1--5",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Research",
issn = "0022-4804",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic gastrostomy

T2 - A safe method for obtaining enteral access

AU - Murayama, Kenric M.

AU - Schneider, Philip D.

AU - Thompson, Jon S

PY - 1995/1

Y1 - 1995/1

N2 - Laparoscopic gastrostomy is a relatively new procedure which does not require a laparotomy but which allows direct visualization of the gastrostomy tube entering the stomach and the stomach-parietal peritoneum interface. The role of the laparoscopically placed gastrostomy for enteral access has yet to be defined. Our aim was to compare laparoscopic gastrostomy with open surgical gastrostomy to determine the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic gastrostomy as a method for obtaining long term enteral access. We reviewed the records of 32 patients (December 1992 to April 1994) who had laparoscopic gastrostomy (group I) and 37 patients (January 1987 to December 1993) who had open gastrostomy (group II). The indications, length of operation, and morbidity and mortality rates in both groups were compared. The underlying diseases and indications for gastrostomy placement were similar in both groups. Both groups included primarily patients who were not candidates for upper endoscopy. Operative time was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic gastrostomy group (38 ± 7 min) than in the open gastrostomy group (62 ± 19), P < 0.0001. Major complication for laparoscopic gastrostomy was 6% and for open gastrostomy was 11%. There was no procedure-related mortality in group I and three patients in group II died in the immediate postoperative period. Major morbidity and mortality rates were not significantly different between the two groups. Laparoscopic gastrostomy is a safe and effective alternative to open gastrostomy, particularly in patients unable to undergo upper endoscopy or in patients undergoing a concomitant laparoscopic procedure.

AB - Laparoscopic gastrostomy is a relatively new procedure which does not require a laparotomy but which allows direct visualization of the gastrostomy tube entering the stomach and the stomach-parietal peritoneum interface. The role of the laparoscopically placed gastrostomy for enteral access has yet to be defined. Our aim was to compare laparoscopic gastrostomy with open surgical gastrostomy to determine the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic gastrostomy as a method for obtaining long term enteral access. We reviewed the records of 32 patients (December 1992 to April 1994) who had laparoscopic gastrostomy (group I) and 37 patients (January 1987 to December 1993) who had open gastrostomy (group II). The indications, length of operation, and morbidity and mortality rates in both groups were compared. The underlying diseases and indications for gastrostomy placement were similar in both groups. Both groups included primarily patients who were not candidates for upper endoscopy. Operative time was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic gastrostomy group (38 ± 7 min) than in the open gastrostomy group (62 ± 19), P < 0.0001. Major complication for laparoscopic gastrostomy was 6% and for open gastrostomy was 11%. There was no procedure-related mortality in group I and three patients in group II died in the immediate postoperative period. Major morbidity and mortality rates were not significantly different between the two groups. Laparoscopic gastrostomy is a safe and effective alternative to open gastrostomy, particularly in patients unable to undergo upper endoscopy or in patients undergoing a concomitant laparoscopic procedure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028815045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028815045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/jsre.1995.1001

DO - 10.1006/jsre.1995.1001

M3 - Article

C2 - 7830397

AN - SCOPUS:0028815045

VL - 58

SP - 1

EP - 5

JO - Journal of Surgical Research

JF - Journal of Surgical Research

SN - 0022-4804

IS - 1

ER -