Landlord Attitudes and Behaviors Regarding Smoke-Free Policies

Implications for Voluntary Policy Change

Mary E Cramer, Sara Roberts, Elizabeth Stevens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Objective: The study purpose was to describe multiunit landlord attitudes and behaviors toward smoke-free policies.Design and Sample: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional survey of multiunit landlords in Douglas County (N=392). Measures: A 25-item survey was developed and pilot tested. It was administered by telephone (n=143) and mail (n=249) to multiunit landlords.Results: Combined response rate was 30.1% (81/143 telephone, 37/249 mail) representing 24,080 units on 974 properties with 34,399 tenants. Most respondents (73.7%) allowed smoking. Reasons for not implementing smoke-free policies were potential enforcement problems (57.0%), tenant objections (43.0%), loss of market share (39.5%). Respondents without smoke-free policies expected vacancy (53.6%) and turnover (50.0%) rates to increase, which was significantly different (p<.0001) than respondents with smoke-free policies where only 10.7% reported increased vacancy and only 3.7% reported increased turnover.Conclusions: Expected adverse impacts of smoke-free policies do not reflect real experiences of smoke-free policy implementation. Public health advocates can use these study findings to develop community-based education and social marketing messages directed at voluntary smoke-free policy changes. Respondents without smoke-free policies expressed interest at the end of the survey in learning how to implement smoke-free policies indicating a readiness for change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-12
Number of pages10
JournalPublic Health Nursing
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

Fingerprint

Smoke-Free Policy
Postal Service
Telephone
Social Marketing
Surveys and Questionnaires
Public Health
Cross-Sectional Studies
Smoking
Learning

Keywords

  • Hazardous exposures
  • Health policy
  • Health promotion
  • Legislation
  • Tobacco

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Landlord Attitudes and Behaviors Regarding Smoke-Free Policies : Implications for Voluntary Policy Change. / Cramer, Mary E; Roberts, Sara; Stevens, Elizabeth.

In: Public Health Nursing, Vol. 28, No. 1, 01.01.2011, p. 3-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cb45f65619ad4991a7b0d9deedda11f6,
title = "Landlord Attitudes and Behaviors Regarding Smoke-Free Policies: Implications for Voluntary Policy Change",
abstract = "Objective: Objective: The study purpose was to describe multiunit landlord attitudes and behaviors toward smoke-free policies.Design and Sample: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional survey of multiunit landlords in Douglas County (N=392). Measures: A 25-item survey was developed and pilot tested. It was administered by telephone (n=143) and mail (n=249) to multiunit landlords.Results: Combined response rate was 30.1{\%} (81/143 telephone, 37/249 mail) representing 24,080 units on 974 properties with 34,399 tenants. Most respondents (73.7{\%}) allowed smoking. Reasons for not implementing smoke-free policies were potential enforcement problems (57.0{\%}), tenant objections (43.0{\%}), loss of market share (39.5{\%}). Respondents without smoke-free policies expected vacancy (53.6{\%}) and turnover (50.0{\%}) rates to increase, which was significantly different (p<.0001) than respondents with smoke-free policies where only 10.7{\%} reported increased vacancy and only 3.7{\%} reported increased turnover.Conclusions: Expected adverse impacts of smoke-free policies do not reflect real experiences of smoke-free policy implementation. Public health advocates can use these study findings to develop community-based education and social marketing messages directed at voluntary smoke-free policy changes. Respondents without smoke-free policies expressed interest at the end of the survey in learning how to implement smoke-free policies indicating a readiness for change.",
keywords = "Hazardous exposures, Health policy, Health promotion, Legislation, Tobacco",
author = "Cramer, {Mary E} and Sara Roberts and Elizabeth Stevens",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1525-1446.2010.00904.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "3--12",
journal = "Public Health Nursing",
issn = "0737-1209",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Landlord Attitudes and Behaviors Regarding Smoke-Free Policies

T2 - Implications for Voluntary Policy Change

AU - Cramer, Mary E

AU - Roberts, Sara

AU - Stevens, Elizabeth

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Objective: Objective: The study purpose was to describe multiunit landlord attitudes and behaviors toward smoke-free policies.Design and Sample: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional survey of multiunit landlords in Douglas County (N=392). Measures: A 25-item survey was developed and pilot tested. It was administered by telephone (n=143) and mail (n=249) to multiunit landlords.Results: Combined response rate was 30.1% (81/143 telephone, 37/249 mail) representing 24,080 units on 974 properties with 34,399 tenants. Most respondents (73.7%) allowed smoking. Reasons for not implementing smoke-free policies were potential enforcement problems (57.0%), tenant objections (43.0%), loss of market share (39.5%). Respondents without smoke-free policies expected vacancy (53.6%) and turnover (50.0%) rates to increase, which was significantly different (p<.0001) than respondents with smoke-free policies where only 10.7% reported increased vacancy and only 3.7% reported increased turnover.Conclusions: Expected adverse impacts of smoke-free policies do not reflect real experiences of smoke-free policy implementation. Public health advocates can use these study findings to develop community-based education and social marketing messages directed at voluntary smoke-free policy changes. Respondents without smoke-free policies expressed interest at the end of the survey in learning how to implement smoke-free policies indicating a readiness for change.

AB - Objective: Objective: The study purpose was to describe multiunit landlord attitudes and behaviors toward smoke-free policies.Design and Sample: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional survey of multiunit landlords in Douglas County (N=392). Measures: A 25-item survey was developed and pilot tested. It was administered by telephone (n=143) and mail (n=249) to multiunit landlords.Results: Combined response rate was 30.1% (81/143 telephone, 37/249 mail) representing 24,080 units on 974 properties with 34,399 tenants. Most respondents (73.7%) allowed smoking. Reasons for not implementing smoke-free policies were potential enforcement problems (57.0%), tenant objections (43.0%), loss of market share (39.5%). Respondents without smoke-free policies expected vacancy (53.6%) and turnover (50.0%) rates to increase, which was significantly different (p<.0001) than respondents with smoke-free policies where only 10.7% reported increased vacancy and only 3.7% reported increased turnover.Conclusions: Expected adverse impacts of smoke-free policies do not reflect real experiences of smoke-free policy implementation. Public health advocates can use these study findings to develop community-based education and social marketing messages directed at voluntary smoke-free policy changes. Respondents without smoke-free policies expressed interest at the end of the survey in learning how to implement smoke-free policies indicating a readiness for change.

KW - Hazardous exposures

KW - Health policy

KW - Health promotion

KW - Legislation

KW - Tobacco

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650697905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650697905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2010.00904.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2010.00904.x

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 3

EP - 12

JO - Public Health Nursing

JF - Public Health Nursing

SN - 0737-1209

IS - 1

ER -