Lakoff's Theory of Moral Reasoning in Presidential Campaign Advertisements, 1952-2012

Jessy J. Ohl, Damien S. Pfister, Martin Nader, Dana Griffin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examines the presence and distribution of George Lakoff's Strict Father and Nurturant Parent paradigms of moral reasoning in presidential campaign advertisements between 1952 and 2012. Results show that Republicans outpace Democrats in the general use of moral reasoning and that Republicans are far more likely to use Strict Father language than Democrats. The study found no difference in the use of Strict Father/Nurturant Parent morality throughout history, during times of war and recession, or if the candidate was an incumbent. The Strict Father and Nurturant Parent models of moral reasoning were also evaluated based on their relationship to political issues. Findings reveal that Democrats actively avoid Nurturant Parent reasoning when discussing specific social programs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)488-507
Number of pages20
JournalCommunication Studies
Volume64
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2013

Fingerprint

father
parents
campaign
recession
morality
candidacy
paradigm
history
language

Keywords

  • Lakoff
  • Moral Reasoning
  • Political Advertising
  • Presidential Campaign

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Cite this

Lakoff's Theory of Moral Reasoning in Presidential Campaign Advertisements, 1952-2012. / Ohl, Jessy J.; Pfister, Damien S.; Nader, Martin; Griffin, Dana.

In: Communication Studies, Vol. 64, No. 5, 01.11.2013, p. 488-507.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ohl, Jessy J. ; Pfister, Damien S. ; Nader, Martin ; Griffin, Dana. / Lakoff's Theory of Moral Reasoning in Presidential Campaign Advertisements, 1952-2012. In: Communication Studies. 2013 ; Vol. 64, No. 5. pp. 488-507.
@article{7b8909a7ab0941ce85e770506a256d8b,
title = "Lakoff's Theory of Moral Reasoning in Presidential Campaign Advertisements, 1952-2012",
abstract = "This study examines the presence and distribution of George Lakoff's Strict Father and Nurturant Parent paradigms of moral reasoning in presidential campaign advertisements between 1952 and 2012. Results show that Republicans outpace Democrats in the general use of moral reasoning and that Republicans are far more likely to use Strict Father language than Democrats. The study found no difference in the use of Strict Father/Nurturant Parent morality throughout history, during times of war and recession, or if the candidate was an incumbent. The Strict Father and Nurturant Parent models of moral reasoning were also evaluated based on their relationship to political issues. Findings reveal that Democrats actively avoid Nurturant Parent reasoning when discussing specific social programs.",
keywords = "Lakoff, Moral Reasoning, Political Advertising, Presidential Campaign",
author = "Ohl, {Jessy J.} and Pfister, {Damien S.} and Martin Nader and Dana Griffin",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10510974.2013.832340",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "488--507",
journal = "Communication Studies",
issn = "1051-0974",
publisher = "Central States Communication Association",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lakoff's Theory of Moral Reasoning in Presidential Campaign Advertisements, 1952-2012

AU - Ohl, Jessy J.

AU - Pfister, Damien S.

AU - Nader, Martin

AU - Griffin, Dana

PY - 2013/11/1

Y1 - 2013/11/1

N2 - This study examines the presence and distribution of George Lakoff's Strict Father and Nurturant Parent paradigms of moral reasoning in presidential campaign advertisements between 1952 and 2012. Results show that Republicans outpace Democrats in the general use of moral reasoning and that Republicans are far more likely to use Strict Father language than Democrats. The study found no difference in the use of Strict Father/Nurturant Parent morality throughout history, during times of war and recession, or if the candidate was an incumbent. The Strict Father and Nurturant Parent models of moral reasoning were also evaluated based on their relationship to political issues. Findings reveal that Democrats actively avoid Nurturant Parent reasoning when discussing specific social programs.

AB - This study examines the presence and distribution of George Lakoff's Strict Father and Nurturant Parent paradigms of moral reasoning in presidential campaign advertisements between 1952 and 2012. Results show that Republicans outpace Democrats in the general use of moral reasoning and that Republicans are far more likely to use Strict Father language than Democrats. The study found no difference in the use of Strict Father/Nurturant Parent morality throughout history, during times of war and recession, or if the candidate was an incumbent. The Strict Father and Nurturant Parent models of moral reasoning were also evaluated based on their relationship to political issues. Findings reveal that Democrats actively avoid Nurturant Parent reasoning when discussing specific social programs.

KW - Lakoff

KW - Moral Reasoning

KW - Political Advertising

KW - Presidential Campaign

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886381223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886381223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10510974.2013.832340

DO - 10.1080/10510974.2013.832340

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84886381223

VL - 64

SP - 488

EP - 507

JO - Communication Studies

JF - Communication Studies

SN - 1051-0974

IS - 5

ER -