Knowledge in sheep's clothing: How science informs American diplomacy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Advances in modern science are now shaping both the character and content of international relations. Scientific issues in international diplomacy such as environmental issues, space policy, biotechnology and stem cell uses, and weapons technology will all require the participation of an epistemic community of scientists alongside traditional diplomats. This article will examine three historical cases of American diplomacy in which science made a significant contribution to the outcome: the German-American Pork War of 1880-1891, the International Geophysical Year of 1956-1957, and the Montreal Protocol of 1987. In each instance, by utilizing scientists and their knowledge, the United States was able to gain benefits from cooperation that it could not have gained alone. Now, however, the US government has de-emphasized the contributions of science and scientists to its detriment when negotiating the largest international scientific problem to date: global climate change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal of Phytoremediation
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

Biotechnology
clothing
Stem cells
Climate change
sheep
Montreal Protocol
community service
international relations
weapon
biotechnology
environmental issue
pork
stem cells
global climate
climate change
science

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Pollution
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Knowledge in sheep's clothing : How science informs American diplomacy. / Chalecki, Elizabeth L.

In: International Journal of Phytoremediation, Vol. 19, No. 1, 01.01.2008, p. 1-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b233dbcd935a47f0b0479c19cf213b64,
title = "Knowledge in sheep's clothing: How science informs American diplomacy",
abstract = "Advances in modern science are now shaping both the character and content of international relations. Scientific issues in international diplomacy such as environmental issues, space policy, biotechnology and stem cell uses, and weapons technology will all require the participation of an epistemic community of scientists alongside traditional diplomats. This article will examine three historical cases of American diplomacy in which science made a significant contribution to the outcome: the German-American Pork War of 1880-1891, the International Geophysical Year of 1956-1957, and the Montreal Protocol of 1987. In each instance, by utilizing scientists and their knowledge, the United States was able to gain benefits from cooperation that it could not have gained alone. Now, however, the US government has de-emphasized the contributions of science and scientists to its detriment when negotiating the largest international scientific problem to date: global climate change.",
author = "Chalecki, {Elizabeth L.}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09592290801913676",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "1--19",
journal = "International Journal of Phytoremediation",
issn = "1522-6514",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Knowledge in sheep's clothing

T2 - How science informs American diplomacy

AU - Chalecki, Elizabeth L.

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Advances in modern science are now shaping both the character and content of international relations. Scientific issues in international diplomacy such as environmental issues, space policy, biotechnology and stem cell uses, and weapons technology will all require the participation of an epistemic community of scientists alongside traditional diplomats. This article will examine three historical cases of American diplomacy in which science made a significant contribution to the outcome: the German-American Pork War of 1880-1891, the International Geophysical Year of 1956-1957, and the Montreal Protocol of 1987. In each instance, by utilizing scientists and their knowledge, the United States was able to gain benefits from cooperation that it could not have gained alone. Now, however, the US government has de-emphasized the contributions of science and scientists to its detriment when negotiating the largest international scientific problem to date: global climate change.

AB - Advances in modern science are now shaping both the character and content of international relations. Scientific issues in international diplomacy such as environmental issues, space policy, biotechnology and stem cell uses, and weapons technology will all require the participation of an epistemic community of scientists alongside traditional diplomats. This article will examine three historical cases of American diplomacy in which science made a significant contribution to the outcome: the German-American Pork War of 1880-1891, the International Geophysical Year of 1956-1957, and the Montreal Protocol of 1987. In each instance, by utilizing scientists and their knowledge, the United States was able to gain benefits from cooperation that it could not have gained alone. Now, however, the US government has de-emphasized the contributions of science and scientists to its detriment when negotiating the largest international scientific problem to date: global climate change.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064801911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064801911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09592290801913676

DO - 10.1080/09592290801913676

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85064801911

VL - 19

SP - 1

EP - 19

JO - International Journal of Phytoremediation

JF - International Journal of Phytoremediation

SN - 1522-6514

IS - 1

ER -