Just deserts: An experimental study of distributive justice norms

John T. Scott, Richard E. Matland, Philip A. Michelbach, Brian H Bornstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

66 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We present a theoretically informed experimental study of distributive justice norms concerning income distribution. Our study consists of three related experiments that examine how individuals use four distinct allocation principles derived from both normative and empirical research - equality, merit, need, and efficiency - under a condition of impartiality. Our experiments are designed to investigate these principles and to determine how independent factors influence how individuals use them. We find that individuals tend to use all or most of these principles simultaneously in making distributive justice judgments, but that they weigh them differently according to various factors. In particular, we find an expectedly strong difference between how women and men use and weigh these principles. This gender difference parallels - and may even underlie - the gender gap observed in political and policy preferences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)749-767
Number of pages19
JournalAmerican Journal of Political Science
Volume45
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

distributive justice
desert
experiment
income distribution
empirical research
equality
gender-specific factors
efficiency
gender

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Just deserts : An experimental study of distributive justice norms. / Scott, John T.; Matland, Richard E.; Michelbach, Philip A.; Bornstein, Brian H.

In: American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 45, No. 4, 01.01.2001, p. 749-767.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Scott, John T. ; Matland, Richard E. ; Michelbach, Philip A. ; Bornstein, Brian H. / Just deserts : An experimental study of distributive justice norms. In: American Journal of Political Science. 2001 ; Vol. 45, No. 4. pp. 749-767.
@article{62eb6c273714452cbf46fa48a44382de,
title = "Just deserts: An experimental study of distributive justice norms",
abstract = "We present a theoretically informed experimental study of distributive justice norms concerning income distribution. Our study consists of three related experiments that examine how individuals use four distinct allocation principles derived from both normative and empirical research - equality, merit, need, and efficiency - under a condition of impartiality. Our experiments are designed to investigate these principles and to determine how independent factors influence how individuals use them. We find that individuals tend to use all or most of these principles simultaneously in making distributive justice judgments, but that they weigh them differently according to various factors. In particular, we find an expectedly strong difference between how women and men use and weigh these principles. This gender difference parallels - and may even underlie - the gender gap observed in political and policy preferences.",
author = "Scott, {John T.} and Matland, {Richard E.} and Michelbach, {Philip A.} and Bornstein, {Brian H}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2307/2669322",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "749--767",
journal = "American Journal of Political Science",
issn = "0092-5853",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Just deserts

T2 - An experimental study of distributive justice norms

AU - Scott, John T.

AU - Matland, Richard E.

AU - Michelbach, Philip A.

AU - Bornstein, Brian H

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - We present a theoretically informed experimental study of distributive justice norms concerning income distribution. Our study consists of three related experiments that examine how individuals use four distinct allocation principles derived from both normative and empirical research - equality, merit, need, and efficiency - under a condition of impartiality. Our experiments are designed to investigate these principles and to determine how independent factors influence how individuals use them. We find that individuals tend to use all or most of these principles simultaneously in making distributive justice judgments, but that they weigh them differently according to various factors. In particular, we find an expectedly strong difference between how women and men use and weigh these principles. This gender difference parallels - and may even underlie - the gender gap observed in political and policy preferences.

AB - We present a theoretically informed experimental study of distributive justice norms concerning income distribution. Our study consists of three related experiments that examine how individuals use four distinct allocation principles derived from both normative and empirical research - equality, merit, need, and efficiency - under a condition of impartiality. Our experiments are designed to investigate these principles and to determine how independent factors influence how individuals use them. We find that individuals tend to use all or most of these principles simultaneously in making distributive justice judgments, but that they weigh them differently according to various factors. In particular, we find an expectedly strong difference between how women and men use and weigh these principles. This gender difference parallels - and may even underlie - the gender gap observed in political and policy preferences.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035538487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035538487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/2669322

DO - 10.2307/2669322

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0035538487

VL - 45

SP - 749

EP - 767

JO - American Journal of Political Science

JF - American Journal of Political Science

SN - 0092-5853

IS - 4

ER -