Judicial stress: the roles of gender and social support

Monica K. Miller, Jenny Reichert, Brian H Bornstein, Grant Shulman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Because judges experience a myriad of occupational stressors, they are at risk of experiencing secondary trauma, burnout, negative mental/physical health, poor job performance and low job satisfaction. These experiences might not be uniform, however, as gender and social support might mitigate such stress-related outcomes. Judges from two states in the United States completed a variety of stress and subjective performance measures. Social support was related to less perceived stress, less burnout, and more job satisfaction, but only for males. This suggests that males and females might receive qualitatively different types of social support. Different types of social support could differ in their ability to buffer judges from these stress-related outcomes. Further, among judges with high social support, females scored higher than males on subjective job performance; the opposite pattern occurred for judges with low social support. Thus, a lack of social support appears to have a negative effect on performance self-appraisals but only for females. Results have implications for the psychological study of stress and for programs designed to reduce judges’ stress.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)602-618
Number of pages17
JournalPsychiatry, Psychology and Law
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 4 2018

Fingerprint

Judicial Role
Social Support
social support
gender
job performance
Job Satisfaction
burnout
job satisfaction
Diagnostic Self Evaluation
Aptitude
Psychological Stress
performance
trauma
Mental Health
Buffers
experience

Keywords

  • burnout
  • gender
  • judge
  • occupational stress
  • social support
  • trauma
  • well-being

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Law

Cite this

Judicial stress : the roles of gender and social support. / Miller, Monica K.; Reichert, Jenny; Bornstein, Brian H; Shulman, Grant.

In: Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, Vol. 25, No. 4, 04.07.2018, p. 602-618.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Miller, Monica K. ; Reichert, Jenny ; Bornstein, Brian H ; Shulman, Grant. / Judicial stress : the roles of gender and social support. In: Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. 2018 ; Vol. 25, No. 4. pp. 602-618.
@article{a005175887944cfcba7692e212fec686,
title = "Judicial stress: the roles of gender and social support",
abstract = "Because judges experience a myriad of occupational stressors, they are at risk of experiencing secondary trauma, burnout, negative mental/physical health, poor job performance and low job satisfaction. These experiences might not be uniform, however, as gender and social support might mitigate such stress-related outcomes. Judges from two states in the United States completed a variety of stress and subjective performance measures. Social support was related to less perceived stress, less burnout, and more job satisfaction, but only for males. This suggests that males and females might receive qualitatively different types of social support. Different types of social support could differ in their ability to buffer judges from these stress-related outcomes. Further, among judges with high social support, females scored higher than males on subjective job performance; the opposite pattern occurred for judges with low social support. Thus, a lack of social support appears to have a negative effect on performance self-appraisals but only for females. Results have implications for the psychological study of stress and for programs designed to reduce judges’ stress.",
keywords = "burnout, gender, judge, occupational stress, social support, trauma, well-being",
author = "Miller, {Monica K.} and Jenny Reichert and Bornstein, {Brian H} and Grant Shulman",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/13218719.2018.1469436",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "602--618",
journal = "Psychiatry, Psychology and Law",
issn = "1321-8719",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Judicial stress

T2 - the roles of gender and social support

AU - Miller, Monica K.

AU - Reichert, Jenny

AU - Bornstein, Brian H

AU - Shulman, Grant

PY - 2018/7/4

Y1 - 2018/7/4

N2 - Because judges experience a myriad of occupational stressors, they are at risk of experiencing secondary trauma, burnout, negative mental/physical health, poor job performance and low job satisfaction. These experiences might not be uniform, however, as gender and social support might mitigate such stress-related outcomes. Judges from two states in the United States completed a variety of stress and subjective performance measures. Social support was related to less perceived stress, less burnout, and more job satisfaction, but only for males. This suggests that males and females might receive qualitatively different types of social support. Different types of social support could differ in their ability to buffer judges from these stress-related outcomes. Further, among judges with high social support, females scored higher than males on subjective job performance; the opposite pattern occurred for judges with low social support. Thus, a lack of social support appears to have a negative effect on performance self-appraisals but only for females. Results have implications for the psychological study of stress and for programs designed to reduce judges’ stress.

AB - Because judges experience a myriad of occupational stressors, they are at risk of experiencing secondary trauma, burnout, negative mental/physical health, poor job performance and low job satisfaction. These experiences might not be uniform, however, as gender and social support might mitigate such stress-related outcomes. Judges from two states in the United States completed a variety of stress and subjective performance measures. Social support was related to less perceived stress, less burnout, and more job satisfaction, but only for males. This suggests that males and females might receive qualitatively different types of social support. Different types of social support could differ in their ability to buffer judges from these stress-related outcomes. Further, among judges with high social support, females scored higher than males on subjective job performance; the opposite pattern occurred for judges with low social support. Thus, a lack of social support appears to have a negative effect on performance self-appraisals but only for females. Results have implications for the psychological study of stress and for programs designed to reduce judges’ stress.

KW - burnout

KW - gender

KW - judge

KW - occupational stress

KW - social support

KW - trauma

KW - well-being

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048104135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048104135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13218719.2018.1469436

DO - 10.1080/13218719.2018.1469436

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85048104135

VL - 25

SP - 602

EP - 618

JO - Psychiatry, Psychology and Law

JF - Psychiatry, Psychology and Law

SN - 1321-8719

IS - 4

ER -