Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA publications and communications board task force report

Heidi M. Levitt, Michael Bamberg, John W. Creswell, David M. Frost, Ruthellen Josselson, Carola Suárez-Orozco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

134 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The American Psychological Association Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Research (JARS-Qual Working Group) was charged with examining the state of journal article reporting standards as they applied to qualitative research and with generating recommendations for standards that would be appropriate for a wide range of methods within the discipline of psychology. These standards describe what should be included in a research report to enable and facilitate the review process. This publication marks a historical moment-the first inclusion of qualitative research in APA Style, which is the basis of both the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA, 2010) and APA Style CENTRAL, an online program to support APA Style. In addition to the general JARS-Qual guidelines, the Working Group has developed standards for both qualitative meta-analysis and mixed methods research. The reporting standards were developed for psychological qualitative research but may hold utility for a broad range of social sciences. They honor a range of qualitative traditions, methods, and reporting styles. The Working Group was composed of a group of researchers with backgrounds in varying methods, research topics, and approaches to inquiry. In this article, they present these standards and their rationale, and they detail the ways that the standards differ from the quantitative research reporting standards. They describe how the standards can be used by authors in the process of writing qualitative research for submission as well as by reviewers and editors in the process of reviewing research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)26-46
Number of pages21
JournalAmerican Psychologist
Volume73
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Communication Aids for Disabled
Advisory Committees
Publications
Psychology
Qualitative Research
Research
Social Sciences
Meta-Analysis

Keywords

  • APA Style
  • Mixed methods
  • Qualitative meta-analysis
  • Qualitative research methods
  • Reporting standards

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology : The APA publications and communications board task force report. / Levitt, Heidi M.; Bamberg, Michael; Creswell, John W.; Frost, David M.; Josselson, Ruthellen; Suárez-Orozco, Carola.

In: American Psychologist, Vol. 73, No. 1, 01.2018, p. 26-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{be4f0442e91d4f028d4aea55c25d3c6f,
title = "Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA publications and communications board task force report",
abstract = "The American Psychological Association Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Research (JARS-Qual Working Group) was charged with examining the state of journal article reporting standards as they applied to qualitative research and with generating recommendations for standards that would be appropriate for a wide range of methods within the discipline of psychology. These standards describe what should be included in a research report to enable and facilitate the review process. This publication marks a historical moment-the first inclusion of qualitative research in APA Style, which is the basis of both the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA, 2010) and APA Style CENTRAL, an online program to support APA Style. In addition to the general JARS-Qual guidelines, the Working Group has developed standards for both qualitative meta-analysis and mixed methods research. The reporting standards were developed for psychological qualitative research but may hold utility for a broad range of social sciences. They honor a range of qualitative traditions, methods, and reporting styles. The Working Group was composed of a group of researchers with backgrounds in varying methods, research topics, and approaches to inquiry. In this article, they present these standards and their rationale, and they detail the ways that the standards differ from the quantitative research reporting standards. They describe how the standards can be used by authors in the process of writing qualitative research for submission as well as by reviewers and editors in the process of reviewing research.",
keywords = "APA Style, Mixed methods, Qualitative meta-analysis, Qualitative research methods, Reporting standards",
author = "Levitt, {Heidi M.} and Michael Bamberg and Creswell, {John W.} and Frost, {David M.} and Ruthellen Josselson and Carola Su{\'a}rez-Orozco",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1037/amp0000151",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "26--46",
journal = "American Psychologist",
issn = "0003-066X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology

T2 - The APA publications and communications board task force report

AU - Levitt, Heidi M.

AU - Bamberg, Michael

AU - Creswell, John W.

AU - Frost, David M.

AU - Josselson, Ruthellen

AU - Suárez-Orozco, Carola

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - The American Psychological Association Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Research (JARS-Qual Working Group) was charged with examining the state of journal article reporting standards as they applied to qualitative research and with generating recommendations for standards that would be appropriate for a wide range of methods within the discipline of psychology. These standards describe what should be included in a research report to enable and facilitate the review process. This publication marks a historical moment-the first inclusion of qualitative research in APA Style, which is the basis of both the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA, 2010) and APA Style CENTRAL, an online program to support APA Style. In addition to the general JARS-Qual guidelines, the Working Group has developed standards for both qualitative meta-analysis and mixed methods research. The reporting standards were developed for psychological qualitative research but may hold utility for a broad range of social sciences. They honor a range of qualitative traditions, methods, and reporting styles. The Working Group was composed of a group of researchers with backgrounds in varying methods, research topics, and approaches to inquiry. In this article, they present these standards and their rationale, and they detail the ways that the standards differ from the quantitative research reporting standards. They describe how the standards can be used by authors in the process of writing qualitative research for submission as well as by reviewers and editors in the process of reviewing research.

AB - The American Psychological Association Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Research (JARS-Qual Working Group) was charged with examining the state of journal article reporting standards as they applied to qualitative research and with generating recommendations for standards that would be appropriate for a wide range of methods within the discipline of psychology. These standards describe what should be included in a research report to enable and facilitate the review process. This publication marks a historical moment-the first inclusion of qualitative research in APA Style, which is the basis of both the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA, 2010) and APA Style CENTRAL, an online program to support APA Style. In addition to the general JARS-Qual guidelines, the Working Group has developed standards for both qualitative meta-analysis and mixed methods research. The reporting standards were developed for psychological qualitative research but may hold utility for a broad range of social sciences. They honor a range of qualitative traditions, methods, and reporting styles. The Working Group was composed of a group of researchers with backgrounds in varying methods, research topics, and approaches to inquiry. In this article, they present these standards and their rationale, and they detail the ways that the standards differ from the quantitative research reporting standards. They describe how the standards can be used by authors in the process of writing qualitative research for submission as well as by reviewers and editors in the process of reviewing research.

KW - APA Style

KW - Mixed methods

KW - Qualitative meta-analysis

KW - Qualitative research methods

KW - Reporting standards

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040670953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040670953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/amp0000151

DO - 10.1037/amp0000151

M3 - Article

C2 - 29345485

AN - SCOPUS:85040670953

VL - 73

SP - 26

EP - 46

JO - American Psychologist

JF - American Psychologist

SN - 0003-066X

IS - 1

ER -