Job Satisfaction and Job Performance. A Meta-Analysis

Michelle I Graef, Paul M. Muchinsky

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

651 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The assumption that job satisfaction and job performance are related has much intuitive appeal, despite the fact that reviewers of this literature have concluded there is no strong pervasive relation between these two variables. The present meta-analytic study demonstrates that (a) the best estimate of the true population correlation between satisfaction and performance is relatively low (.17); (b) much of the variability in results obtained in previous research has been due to the use of small sample sizes, whereas unreliable measurement of the satisfaction and performance constructs has contributed relatively little to this observed variability in correlations; and (c) nine research design characteristics of a study are only modestly related to the magnitude of the satisfaction-performance correlation that will be obtained. In view of these findings, some of the major substantive and research implications of the job satisfaction-job performance relation are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)251-273
Number of pages23
JournalPsychological Bulletin
Volume97
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 1985

Fingerprint

Job Satisfaction
Meta-Analysis
Research
Sample Size
Research Design
Population
Work Performance
Meta-analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Job Satisfaction and Job Performance. A Meta-Analysis. / Graef, Michelle I; Muchinsky, Paul M.

In: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 97, No. 2, 01.03.1985, p. 251-273.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Graef, Michelle I ; Muchinsky, Paul M. / Job Satisfaction and Job Performance. A Meta-Analysis. In: Psychological Bulletin. 1985 ; Vol. 97, No. 2. pp. 251-273.
@article{16695febcf1a44ee98a02c2835842088,
title = "Job Satisfaction and Job Performance. A Meta-Analysis",
abstract = "The assumption that job satisfaction and job performance are related has much intuitive appeal, despite the fact that reviewers of this literature have concluded there is no strong pervasive relation between these two variables. The present meta-analytic study demonstrates that (a) the best estimate of the true population correlation between satisfaction and performance is relatively low (.17); (b) much of the variability in results obtained in previous research has been due to the use of small sample sizes, whereas unreliable measurement of the satisfaction and performance constructs has contributed relatively little to this observed variability in correlations; and (c) nine research design characteristics of a study are only modestly related to the magnitude of the satisfaction-performance correlation that will be obtained. In view of these findings, some of the major substantive and research implications of the job satisfaction-job performance relation are discussed.",
author = "Graef, {Michelle I} and Muchinsky, {Paul M.}",
year = "1985",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0033-2909.97.2.251",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "97",
pages = "251--273",
journal = "Psychological Bulletin",
issn = "0033-2909",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Job Satisfaction and Job Performance. A Meta-Analysis

AU - Graef, Michelle I

AU - Muchinsky, Paul M.

PY - 1985/3/1

Y1 - 1985/3/1

N2 - The assumption that job satisfaction and job performance are related has much intuitive appeal, despite the fact that reviewers of this literature have concluded there is no strong pervasive relation between these two variables. The present meta-analytic study demonstrates that (a) the best estimate of the true population correlation between satisfaction and performance is relatively low (.17); (b) much of the variability in results obtained in previous research has been due to the use of small sample sizes, whereas unreliable measurement of the satisfaction and performance constructs has contributed relatively little to this observed variability in correlations; and (c) nine research design characteristics of a study are only modestly related to the magnitude of the satisfaction-performance correlation that will be obtained. In view of these findings, some of the major substantive and research implications of the job satisfaction-job performance relation are discussed.

AB - The assumption that job satisfaction and job performance are related has much intuitive appeal, despite the fact that reviewers of this literature have concluded there is no strong pervasive relation between these two variables. The present meta-analytic study demonstrates that (a) the best estimate of the true population correlation between satisfaction and performance is relatively low (.17); (b) much of the variability in results obtained in previous research has been due to the use of small sample sizes, whereas unreliable measurement of the satisfaction and performance constructs has contributed relatively little to this observed variability in correlations; and (c) nine research design characteristics of a study are only modestly related to the magnitude of the satisfaction-performance correlation that will be obtained. In view of these findings, some of the major substantive and research implications of the job satisfaction-job performance relation are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001538711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001538711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0033-2909.97.2.251

DO - 10.1037/0033-2909.97.2.251

M3 - Review article

VL - 97

SP - 251

EP - 273

JO - Psychological Bulletin

JF - Psychological Bulletin

SN - 0033-2909

IS - 2

ER -