Is systemizing a feature of the extreme male brain from an evolutionary perspective?

Jennifer Byrd-Craven, Amber R. Massey, Jessica L Calvi, David C. Geary

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sex differences in empathizing with others and systemizing the abstract rules that govern the operation of things and the natural world have been proposed as the core, essential differences between men and women. We evaluate this assertion in the context of Darwin's (1871) sexual selection and specifically test the hypothesis that the systemizing measure captures interest in evolutionarily novel occupational niches associated with interests in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Young adults (n=233, 149 male) completed the Empathizing Quotient (EQ), the Systemizing Quotient (SQ) and the RIASEC Personality Type Inventory to assess six career interest groups. Sex differences were found on the EQ, SQ, Investigative interests and interest in things, a subset of items from the Realistic scale. Mediation analyses revealed that occupational interests partially mediated the relation between sex and SQ scores, whereas controlling for Investigative interests increased the sex difference in EQ scores. These results provide partial support for the hypothesis and suggest SQ captures, in part, occupational interests in evolutionarily recent STEM fields.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)237-241
Number of pages5
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume82
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015

Fingerprint

Sex Characteristics
Mathematics
Brain
Technology
Personality Inventory
Public Opinion
Young Adult

Keywords

  • Empathizing
  • Extreme male brain
  • Sex differences
  • Systemizing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Is systemizing a feature of the extreme male brain from an evolutionary perspective? / Byrd-Craven, Jennifer; Massey, Amber R.; Calvi, Jessica L; Geary, David C.

In: Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 82, 01.08.2015, p. 237-241.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Byrd-Craven, Jennifer ; Massey, Amber R. ; Calvi, Jessica L ; Geary, David C. / Is systemizing a feature of the extreme male brain from an evolutionary perspective?. In: Personality and Individual Differences. 2015 ; Vol. 82. pp. 237-241.
@article{9b1fc51bb88b45c78c86f31ede169a91,
title = "Is systemizing a feature of the extreme male brain from an evolutionary perspective?",
abstract = "Sex differences in empathizing with others and systemizing the abstract rules that govern the operation of things and the natural world have been proposed as the core, essential differences between men and women. We evaluate this assertion in the context of Darwin's (1871) sexual selection and specifically test the hypothesis that the systemizing measure captures interest in evolutionarily novel occupational niches associated with interests in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Young adults (n=233, 149 male) completed the Empathizing Quotient (EQ), the Systemizing Quotient (SQ) and the RIASEC Personality Type Inventory to assess six career interest groups. Sex differences were found on the EQ, SQ, Investigative interests and interest in things, a subset of items from the Realistic scale. Mediation analyses revealed that occupational interests partially mediated the relation between sex and SQ scores, whereas controlling for Investigative interests increased the sex difference in EQ scores. These results provide partial support for the hypothesis and suggest SQ captures, in part, occupational interests in evolutionarily recent STEM fields.",
keywords = "Empathizing, Extreme male brain, Sex differences, Systemizing",
author = "Jennifer Byrd-Craven and Massey, {Amber R.} and Calvi, {Jessica L} and Geary, {David C.}",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.026",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "237--241",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
issn = "0191-8869",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is systemizing a feature of the extreme male brain from an evolutionary perspective?

AU - Byrd-Craven, Jennifer

AU - Massey, Amber R.

AU - Calvi, Jessica L

AU - Geary, David C.

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - Sex differences in empathizing with others and systemizing the abstract rules that govern the operation of things and the natural world have been proposed as the core, essential differences between men and women. We evaluate this assertion in the context of Darwin's (1871) sexual selection and specifically test the hypothesis that the systemizing measure captures interest in evolutionarily novel occupational niches associated with interests in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Young adults (n=233, 149 male) completed the Empathizing Quotient (EQ), the Systemizing Quotient (SQ) and the RIASEC Personality Type Inventory to assess six career interest groups. Sex differences were found on the EQ, SQ, Investigative interests and interest in things, a subset of items from the Realistic scale. Mediation analyses revealed that occupational interests partially mediated the relation between sex and SQ scores, whereas controlling for Investigative interests increased the sex difference in EQ scores. These results provide partial support for the hypothesis and suggest SQ captures, in part, occupational interests in evolutionarily recent STEM fields.

AB - Sex differences in empathizing with others and systemizing the abstract rules that govern the operation of things and the natural world have been proposed as the core, essential differences between men and women. We evaluate this assertion in the context of Darwin's (1871) sexual selection and specifically test the hypothesis that the systemizing measure captures interest in evolutionarily novel occupational niches associated with interests in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Young adults (n=233, 149 male) completed the Empathizing Quotient (EQ), the Systemizing Quotient (SQ) and the RIASEC Personality Type Inventory to assess six career interest groups. Sex differences were found on the EQ, SQ, Investigative interests and interest in things, a subset of items from the Realistic scale. Mediation analyses revealed that occupational interests partially mediated the relation between sex and SQ scores, whereas controlling for Investigative interests increased the sex difference in EQ scores. These results provide partial support for the hypothesis and suggest SQ captures, in part, occupational interests in evolutionarily recent STEM fields.

KW - Empathizing

KW - Extreme male brain

KW - Sex differences

KW - Systemizing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925685476&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925685476&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.026

DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.026

M3 - Article

VL - 82

SP - 237

EP - 241

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

SN - 0191-8869

ER -