Is reading-aloud performance in megastudies systematically influenced by the list context?

Michael J. Cortese, Sarah Hacker, Jocelyn Schock, Jonathan B. Santo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To examine megastudy context effects, 585 critical words, each with a different orthographic rime, were placed at the beginning or end of a 2614-word megastudy of reading aloud. Sixty participants (30 participants in each condition) responded to these words. Specific predictors examined for change between beginning and end conditions were frequency, length, feedforward rime consistency, feedforward onset consistency, orthographic neighbourhood size, age of acquisition (AoA), and imageability. While it took longer to respond to items at the end of the experiment than items at the beginning of the experiment, there was very little change in the effects of the specific variables assessed. Thus, there is little evidence of list context effects influencing the estimates of the predictor variables in large-scale megastudies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1711-1722
Number of pages12
JournalQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Volume68
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 3 2015

Fingerprint

Reading

Keywords

  • Megastudy
  • Reading aloud

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Is reading-aloud performance in megastudies systematically influenced by the list context? / Cortese, Michael J.; Hacker, Sarah; Schock, Jocelyn; Santo, Jonathan B.

In: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 68, No. 8, 03.08.2015, p. 1711-1722.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bff8efe6e5704c6a800077213d0cb8bf,
title = "Is reading-aloud performance in megastudies systematically influenced by the list context?",
abstract = "To examine megastudy context effects, 585 critical words, each with a different orthographic rime, were placed at the beginning or end of a 2614-word megastudy of reading aloud. Sixty participants (30 participants in each condition) responded to these words. Specific predictors examined for change between beginning and end conditions were frequency, length, feedforward rime consistency, feedforward onset consistency, orthographic neighbourhood size, age of acquisition (AoA), and imageability. While it took longer to respond to items at the end of the experiment than items at the beginning of the experiment, there was very little change in the effects of the specific variables assessed. Thus, there is little evidence of list context effects influencing the estimates of the predictor variables in large-scale megastudies.",
keywords = "Megastudy, Reading aloud",
author = "Cortese, {Michael J.} and Sarah Hacker and Jocelyn Schock and Santo, {Jonathan B.}",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/17470218.2014.974624",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "1711--1722",
journal = "Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology",
issn = "1747-0218",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is reading-aloud performance in megastudies systematically influenced by the list context?

AU - Cortese, Michael J.

AU - Hacker, Sarah

AU - Schock, Jocelyn

AU - Santo, Jonathan B.

PY - 2015/8/3

Y1 - 2015/8/3

N2 - To examine megastudy context effects, 585 critical words, each with a different orthographic rime, were placed at the beginning or end of a 2614-word megastudy of reading aloud. Sixty participants (30 participants in each condition) responded to these words. Specific predictors examined for change between beginning and end conditions were frequency, length, feedforward rime consistency, feedforward onset consistency, orthographic neighbourhood size, age of acquisition (AoA), and imageability. While it took longer to respond to items at the end of the experiment than items at the beginning of the experiment, there was very little change in the effects of the specific variables assessed. Thus, there is little evidence of list context effects influencing the estimates of the predictor variables in large-scale megastudies.

AB - To examine megastudy context effects, 585 critical words, each with a different orthographic rime, were placed at the beginning or end of a 2614-word megastudy of reading aloud. Sixty participants (30 participants in each condition) responded to these words. Specific predictors examined for change between beginning and end conditions were frequency, length, feedforward rime consistency, feedforward onset consistency, orthographic neighbourhood size, age of acquisition (AoA), and imageability. While it took longer to respond to items at the end of the experiment than items at the beginning of the experiment, there was very little change in the effects of the specific variables assessed. Thus, there is little evidence of list context effects influencing the estimates of the predictor variables in large-scale megastudies.

KW - Megastudy

KW - Reading aloud

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84936846134&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84936846134&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17470218.2014.974624

DO - 10.1080/17470218.2014.974624

M3 - Article

C2 - 25312702

AN - SCOPUS:84936846134

VL - 68

SP - 1711

EP - 1722

JO - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

JF - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

SN - 1747-0218

IS - 8

ER -