Is it the middle that is frustrated? Americans' ideological positions and governmental trust

John R Hibbing, James T. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One much-discussed explanation for the largely negative feelings Americans have harbored toward the federal government during the past 30 years or so is that whereas the people prefer centrist policies, elites persist in presenting and debating noncentrist policy solutions. As a result, the argument continues, many people are frustrated by policy debates that seem to be irrelevant to their own concerns and preferences. If this explanation is correct, parties and elites could boost public trust simply by moving closer to the policy center. But as yet, the "frustrated-moderate" thesis has been largely untested. Thus, in this article, using survey research, we determine the extent to which frustration with American government is indeed traceable to the fact that people possess policy positions more moderate than those of politicos. We find the evidence for this proposition to be lacking.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)652-678
Number of pages27
JournalAmerican Politics Research
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2004

Fingerprint

elite
survey research
frustration
Federal Government
evidence

Keywords

  • Government
  • Ideology
  • Moderate
  • Trust

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Is it the middle that is frustrated? Americans' ideological positions and governmental trust. / Hibbing, John R; Smith, James T.

In: American Politics Research, Vol. 32, No. 6, 01.11.2004, p. 652-678.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{250f52a061b54d3e86b2191b51d80f25,
title = "Is it the middle that is frustrated? Americans' ideological positions and governmental trust",
abstract = "One much-discussed explanation for the largely negative feelings Americans have harbored toward the federal government during the past 30 years or so is that whereas the people prefer centrist policies, elites persist in presenting and debating noncentrist policy solutions. As a result, the argument continues, many people are frustrated by policy debates that seem to be irrelevant to their own concerns and preferences. If this explanation is correct, parties and elites could boost public trust simply by moving closer to the policy center. But as yet, the {"}frustrated-moderate{"} thesis has been largely untested. Thus, in this article, using survey research, we determine the extent to which frustration with American government is indeed traceable to the fact that people possess policy positions more moderate than those of politicos. We find the evidence for this proposition to be lacking.",
keywords = "Government, Ideology, Moderate, Trust",
author = "Hibbing, {John R} and Smith, {James T.}",
year = "2004",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1532673X04264539",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "652--678",
journal = "American Politics Research",
issn = "1532-673X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is it the middle that is frustrated? Americans' ideological positions and governmental trust

AU - Hibbing, John R

AU - Smith, James T.

PY - 2004/11/1

Y1 - 2004/11/1

N2 - One much-discussed explanation for the largely negative feelings Americans have harbored toward the federal government during the past 30 years or so is that whereas the people prefer centrist policies, elites persist in presenting and debating noncentrist policy solutions. As a result, the argument continues, many people are frustrated by policy debates that seem to be irrelevant to their own concerns and preferences. If this explanation is correct, parties and elites could boost public trust simply by moving closer to the policy center. But as yet, the "frustrated-moderate" thesis has been largely untested. Thus, in this article, using survey research, we determine the extent to which frustration with American government is indeed traceable to the fact that people possess policy positions more moderate than those of politicos. We find the evidence for this proposition to be lacking.

AB - One much-discussed explanation for the largely negative feelings Americans have harbored toward the federal government during the past 30 years or so is that whereas the people prefer centrist policies, elites persist in presenting and debating noncentrist policy solutions. As a result, the argument continues, many people are frustrated by policy debates that seem to be irrelevant to their own concerns and preferences. If this explanation is correct, parties and elites could boost public trust simply by moving closer to the policy center. But as yet, the "frustrated-moderate" thesis has been largely untested. Thus, in this article, using survey research, we determine the extent to which frustration with American government is indeed traceable to the fact that people possess policy positions more moderate than those of politicos. We find the evidence for this proposition to be lacking.

KW - Government

KW - Ideology

KW - Moderate

KW - Trust

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=7444250279&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=7444250279&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1532673X04264539

DO - 10.1177/1532673X04264539

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 652

EP - 678

JO - American Politics Research

JF - American Politics Research

SN - 1532-673X

IS - 6

ER -