Is It Safe to Prep the External Fixator in Situ during Second-Stage Pilon Surgical Treatment?

Paul J. Nielsen, Leonid S. Grossman, Justin C Siebler, Elizabeth R. Lyden, Lori K. Reed, Matthew A Mormino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the infection rate of our protocol of prepping the external fixator in situ during definitive second-stage pilon fracture open reduction internal fixation. Design: Retrospective clinical investigation. Setting: Academic Level 1 Trauma Center. Patients/Participants: Out of 229 patients with distal tibia fractures presenting to our institution from 1999 to 2014, 100 were treated in a 2-stage fashion utilizing this protocol. Intervention: Prepping the external fixator into the surgical field during the second-stage/definitive open reduction internal fixation procedure. Main Outcome Measurement: The rates of deep and superficial infections after definitive fixation. Results: The deep infection rate was 13%, and the superficial infection rate was 11%. Conclusions: Infection rates using this protocol are comparable to previously reported infection rates for two-stage surgical treatment of pilon fractures. This protocol provides the treating surgeon information about an alternative method to streamline definitive fixation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e102-e105
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

External Fixators
Infection
Therapeutics
Trauma Centers
Tibia

Keywords

  • infection
  • pilon fracture
  • prepping external fixator
  • two-stage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Is It Safe to Prep the External Fixator in Situ during Second-Stage Pilon Surgical Treatment? / Nielsen, Paul J.; Grossman, Leonid S.; Siebler, Justin C; Lyden, Elizabeth R.; Reed, Lori K.; Mormino, Matthew A.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, Vol. 32, No. 3, 01.03.2018, p. e102-e105.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nielsen, Paul J. ; Grossman, Leonid S. ; Siebler, Justin C ; Lyden, Elizabeth R. ; Reed, Lori K. ; Mormino, Matthew A. / Is It Safe to Prep the External Fixator in Situ during Second-Stage Pilon Surgical Treatment?. In: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2018 ; Vol. 32, No. 3. pp. e102-e105.
@article{6dd4e1db2941459280d5682f8462fea7,
title = "Is It Safe to Prep the External Fixator in Situ during Second-Stage Pilon Surgical Treatment?",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate the infection rate of our protocol of prepping the external fixator in situ during definitive second-stage pilon fracture open reduction internal fixation. Design: Retrospective clinical investigation. Setting: Academic Level 1 Trauma Center. Patients/Participants: Out of 229 patients with distal tibia fractures presenting to our institution from 1999 to 2014, 100 were treated in a 2-stage fashion utilizing this protocol. Intervention: Prepping the external fixator into the surgical field during the second-stage/definitive open reduction internal fixation procedure. Main Outcome Measurement: The rates of deep and superficial infections after definitive fixation. Results: The deep infection rate was 13{\%}, and the superficial infection rate was 11{\%}. Conclusions: Infection rates using this protocol are comparable to previously reported infection rates for two-stage surgical treatment of pilon fractures. This protocol provides the treating surgeon information about an alternative method to streamline definitive fixation.",
keywords = "infection, pilon fracture, prepping external fixator, two-stage",
author = "Nielsen, {Paul J.} and Grossman, {Leonid S.} and Siebler, {Justin C} and Lyden, {Elizabeth R.} and Reed, {Lori K.} and Mormino, {Matthew A}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BOT.0000000000001050",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "e102--e105",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma",
issn = "0890-5339",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is It Safe to Prep the External Fixator in Situ during Second-Stage Pilon Surgical Treatment?

AU - Nielsen, Paul J.

AU - Grossman, Leonid S.

AU - Siebler, Justin C

AU - Lyden, Elizabeth R.

AU - Reed, Lori K.

AU - Mormino, Matthew A

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Objective: To evaluate the infection rate of our protocol of prepping the external fixator in situ during definitive second-stage pilon fracture open reduction internal fixation. Design: Retrospective clinical investigation. Setting: Academic Level 1 Trauma Center. Patients/Participants: Out of 229 patients with distal tibia fractures presenting to our institution from 1999 to 2014, 100 were treated in a 2-stage fashion utilizing this protocol. Intervention: Prepping the external fixator into the surgical field during the second-stage/definitive open reduction internal fixation procedure. Main Outcome Measurement: The rates of deep and superficial infections after definitive fixation. Results: The deep infection rate was 13%, and the superficial infection rate was 11%. Conclusions: Infection rates using this protocol are comparable to previously reported infection rates for two-stage surgical treatment of pilon fractures. This protocol provides the treating surgeon information about an alternative method to streamline definitive fixation.

AB - Objective: To evaluate the infection rate of our protocol of prepping the external fixator in situ during definitive second-stage pilon fracture open reduction internal fixation. Design: Retrospective clinical investigation. Setting: Academic Level 1 Trauma Center. Patients/Participants: Out of 229 patients with distal tibia fractures presenting to our institution from 1999 to 2014, 100 were treated in a 2-stage fashion utilizing this protocol. Intervention: Prepping the external fixator into the surgical field during the second-stage/definitive open reduction internal fixation procedure. Main Outcome Measurement: The rates of deep and superficial infections after definitive fixation. Results: The deep infection rate was 13%, and the superficial infection rate was 11%. Conclusions: Infection rates using this protocol are comparable to previously reported infection rates for two-stage surgical treatment of pilon fractures. This protocol provides the treating surgeon information about an alternative method to streamline definitive fixation.

KW - infection

KW - pilon fracture

KW - prepping external fixator

KW - two-stage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044064917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044064917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001050

DO - 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001050

M3 - Article

C2 - 29065036

AN - SCOPUS:85044064917

VL - 32

SP - e102-e105

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

SN - 0890-5339

IS - 3

ER -