Is fatigue all in your head? A critical review of the central governor model

J. P. Weir, T. W. Beck, J. T. Cramer, T. J. Housh

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

87 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The central governor model has recently been proposed as a general model to explain the phenomenon of fatigue. It proposes that the subconscious brain regulates power output (pacing strategy) by modulating motor unit recruitment to preserve whole body homoeostasis and prevent catastrophic physiological failure such as rigor. In this model, the word fatigue is redefined from a term that describes an exercise decline in the ability to produce force and power to one of sensation or emotion. The underpinnings of the central governor model are the refutation of what is described variously as peripheral fatigue, limitations models, and the cardiovascular/anaerobic/catastrophe model. This argument centres on the inability of lactic acid models of fatigue to adequately explain fatigue. In this review, it is argued that a variety of peripheral factors other than lactic acid are known to compromise muscle force and power and that these effects may protect against "catastrophe". Further, it is shown that a variety of studies indicate that fatigue induced decreases in performance cannot be adequately explained by the central governor model. Instead, it is suggested that the concept of task dependency, in which the mechanisms of fatigue vary depending on the specific exercise stressor, is a more comprehensive and defensible model of fatigue. This model includes aspects of both central and peripheral contributions to fatigue, and the relative importance of each probably varies with the type of exercise.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)573-586
Number of pages14
JournalBritish Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume40
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2006

Fingerprint

Fatigue
Head
Lactic Acid
Cardiovascular Models
Neurophysiological Recruitment
Aptitude
Emotions
Homeostasis
Muscles
Brain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Is fatigue all in your head? A critical review of the central governor model. / Weir, J. P.; Beck, T. W.; Cramer, J. T.; Housh, T. J.

In: British Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 40, No. 7, 01.07.2006, p. 573-586.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Weir, J. P. ; Beck, T. W. ; Cramer, J. T. ; Housh, T. J. / Is fatigue all in your head? A critical review of the central governor model. In: British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2006 ; Vol. 40, No. 7. pp. 573-586.
@article{61715a6c5687411b84bf8fce77c8322b,
title = "Is fatigue all in your head? A critical review of the central governor model",
abstract = "The central governor model has recently been proposed as a general model to explain the phenomenon of fatigue. It proposes that the subconscious brain regulates power output (pacing strategy) by modulating motor unit recruitment to preserve whole body homoeostasis and prevent catastrophic physiological failure such as rigor. In this model, the word fatigue is redefined from a term that describes an exercise decline in the ability to produce force and power to one of sensation or emotion. The underpinnings of the central governor model are the refutation of what is described variously as peripheral fatigue, limitations models, and the cardiovascular/anaerobic/catastrophe model. This argument centres on the inability of lactic acid models of fatigue to adequately explain fatigue. In this review, it is argued that a variety of peripheral factors other than lactic acid are known to compromise muscle force and power and that these effects may protect against {"}catastrophe{"}. Further, it is shown that a variety of studies indicate that fatigue induced decreases in performance cannot be adequately explained by the central governor model. Instead, it is suggested that the concept of task dependency, in which the mechanisms of fatigue vary depending on the specific exercise stressor, is a more comprehensive and defensible model of fatigue. This model includes aspects of both central and peripheral contributions to fatigue, and the relative importance of each probably varies with the type of exercise.",
author = "Weir, {J. P.} and Beck, {T. W.} and Cramer, {J. T.} and Housh, {T. J.}",
year = "2006",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bjsm.2005.023028",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "573--586",
journal = "British Journal of Sports Medicine",
issn = "0306-3674",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is fatigue all in your head? A critical review of the central governor model

AU - Weir, J. P.

AU - Beck, T. W.

AU - Cramer, J. T.

AU - Housh, T. J.

PY - 2006/7/1

Y1 - 2006/7/1

N2 - The central governor model has recently been proposed as a general model to explain the phenomenon of fatigue. It proposes that the subconscious brain regulates power output (pacing strategy) by modulating motor unit recruitment to preserve whole body homoeostasis and prevent catastrophic physiological failure such as rigor. In this model, the word fatigue is redefined from a term that describes an exercise decline in the ability to produce force and power to one of sensation or emotion. The underpinnings of the central governor model are the refutation of what is described variously as peripheral fatigue, limitations models, and the cardiovascular/anaerobic/catastrophe model. This argument centres on the inability of lactic acid models of fatigue to adequately explain fatigue. In this review, it is argued that a variety of peripheral factors other than lactic acid are known to compromise muscle force and power and that these effects may protect against "catastrophe". Further, it is shown that a variety of studies indicate that fatigue induced decreases in performance cannot be adequately explained by the central governor model. Instead, it is suggested that the concept of task dependency, in which the mechanisms of fatigue vary depending on the specific exercise stressor, is a more comprehensive and defensible model of fatigue. This model includes aspects of both central and peripheral contributions to fatigue, and the relative importance of each probably varies with the type of exercise.

AB - The central governor model has recently been proposed as a general model to explain the phenomenon of fatigue. It proposes that the subconscious brain regulates power output (pacing strategy) by modulating motor unit recruitment to preserve whole body homoeostasis and prevent catastrophic physiological failure such as rigor. In this model, the word fatigue is redefined from a term that describes an exercise decline in the ability to produce force and power to one of sensation or emotion. The underpinnings of the central governor model are the refutation of what is described variously as peripheral fatigue, limitations models, and the cardiovascular/anaerobic/catastrophe model. This argument centres on the inability of lactic acid models of fatigue to adequately explain fatigue. In this review, it is argued that a variety of peripheral factors other than lactic acid are known to compromise muscle force and power and that these effects may protect against "catastrophe". Further, it is shown that a variety of studies indicate that fatigue induced decreases in performance cannot be adequately explained by the central governor model. Instead, it is suggested that the concept of task dependency, in which the mechanisms of fatigue vary depending on the specific exercise stressor, is a more comprehensive and defensible model of fatigue. This model includes aspects of both central and peripheral contributions to fatigue, and the relative importance of each probably varies with the type of exercise.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745865191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745865191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bjsm.2005.023028

DO - 10.1136/bjsm.2005.023028

M3 - Review article

C2 - 16799110

AN - SCOPUS:33745865191

VL - 40

SP - 573

EP - 586

JO - British Journal of Sports Medicine

JF - British Journal of Sports Medicine

SN - 0306-3674

IS - 7

ER -